Cult of the Wong
Posted: 2002-12-01 03:35pm
We all agree that Wong is a pseudo-religious figure on this board. I say pseudo-religious, because he actually exists. Anyway, would it be a good idea to form a cult of Wong worship?
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=7133
Captain Lennox wrote:Wait , nevermind AnarchistBunny has an intelligent idea. What a surprise indeed.
Sounds like the Disciples of Wong.data_link wrote:We all agree that Wong is a pseudo-religious figure on this board. I say pseudo-religious, because he actually exists. Anyway, would it be a good idea to form a cult of Wong worship?
You piss on Jango Fett! Infidel! I'll send the Clone Army, Boba Fett, and Jango Part 1 the Head, and Part 2 the Body toioo kick those squirrels' asses!anarchistbunny wrote:Captain Lennox wrote:Wait , nevermind AnarchistBunny has an intelligent idea. What a surprise indeed.
I personally prefer to show my appreciation for Darkstar's comments with a bunch of flowers.data_link wrote:Think of it this way: the more we deny that we worship Wong, the more DarkStar and his ilk claim that we do, and we lose credibility from it. On the other hand if we freely admit that we worship Wong, that takes the "deluded warsie" claims right out of his mouth, because we will be freely admitting it, and then it will no longer be an issue in debate, thus allowing us to focus on whowing everyone how utterly stupid he is.
Leave rituals out of it. We're forming a cult, not a religion.Evil Sadistic Bastard wrote:Sounds like the Disciples of Wong.data_link wrote:We all agree that Wong is a pseudo-religious figure on this board. I say pseudo-religious, because he actually exists. Anyway, would it be a good idea to form a cult of Wong worship?
But what rituals will there be? the ritual sacrifice and slaying of a troll to appease him? THe convocation to summon his aid against Darkstar clones?
Whoa now. I said we'd be worshipping him - nowhere did I say that we're going to blindly follow them without evaluating their statements. You can worship someone without believing them to be infallible.Master of Ossus wrote:What the fuck are you guys smoking? You're going to blindly follow someone without evaluating what they say, first? Obviously, no human--including Mike Wong--is infallible. Besides, he probably doesn't even want people to be blindly worshipping him without examining his results, because to do so is to disregard the scientific principles that he believes in.
But they moderatly look squirrels. Anyways, squirrels would be more funny then monkeys.*Changes the tainted Avatar*anarchistbunny wrote:They are monkeys dumbass.
Be seated my children for we are gathered here to remember the tenets of our order.data_link wrote:
Leave rituals out of it. We're forming a cult, not a religion.
Oh by the way - the ten commandments of the Cult of the Wong:
For it is praise to Lord Wong, whose reason is impugnable.1. Thou shalt debate in a rational fashon
Let us not commit the sin of hanging on like stubborn pieces of shit.2. When thou art wrong, thou shalt concede defeat
For without support thine arguments are so much bullshit.3. Thou shalt support your arguments
For as Lord Wong speaks only Reason, so shall we, his disciples, speak only Reason.4. Thou shalt not use fallacies
For verily, the Lord Wong is the voice of Reason, and to blaspheme the Lord Wong is to blaspheme Reason.5. Thou shalt not blaspheme the LORD Wong
For the belief in Creationism is the first step to Stupidity.6. Thou shalt not defend nor hold the doctirine of creationism
For as the Lord does, his Disciples shall follow.7. Thou shalt have a love of Star Wars and anal sex
For the worst trolls are those that take thineselves too seriously.8. Thou shalt have a sense of humor
For it is sinful in the eyes of the Lord.9. Thou shalt not spam
For they have forgotten the face of their Father.10. Thou shalt ruthlessy flame all those who do not keep these commandments.
In the name of Reason, Logic and Intelligence, we commend our message board into the hands of the Lord.What do you think?
yes, but Trekkies could say it appeals too Deity worship.data_link wrote:Whoa now. I said we'd be worshipping him - nowhere did I say that we're going to blindly follow them without evaluating their statements. You can worship someone without believing them to be infallible.Master of Ossus wrote:What the fuck are you guys smoking? You're going to blindly follow someone without evaluating what they say, first? Obviously, no human--including Mike Wong--is infallible. Besides, he probably doesn't even want people to be blindly worshipping him without examining his results, because to do so is to disregard the scientific principles that he believes in.
[Inquisitor]HERETICS! YOU SHALL BURN FOR YOUR BLASPHEMY!!!!![/Inquisitor]Ghost Rider wrote:No...I mean I respect the man and all the work he's put into it, but worship?!
Why, again?
...given that rabid trekkies already consider this, I see no reason to feed their paranoia.
Muwhaha. Don't forget about the mutated sea bass. I can lone you some. *Programs seek and destroy of this pissing monkeys into the sea bass*anarchistbunny wrote:DAMN IT! You win Lennox, I can have the monkeys peeing on Number Two, you devilishly cleaver bastard.