Confederate victory?
Moderator: Edi
Confederate victory?
One of my favorite hobbies is conterfactuals. So my question is what do you think would be the effects of a Confederate victory would be?
Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:45 pm 666th post.
- Pablo Sanchez
- Commissar
- Posts: 6998
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:41pm
- Location: The Wasteland
Exactly. Turtledove was being way too optimistic when he assumed that a backward, agrarian nation with relatively small population and a significant and badly oppressed minority could ever stand up to a heavily populated industrialized nation. That is essentially how the two sides would square off by the 1880s.Mr Bean wrote:Long Term stagnation combined with a second Civil War is what I predicat back when they ask that in collage
Eventually, I think the CSA would do something to piss the USA off, and then they would be crushed under the Union boot. Huzzah.
"I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unleash my dogs of war."
--The Lord Humungus
doubt it. A confederete victory at gettysberg would have sent the north reeling. If the confeds had one, adn ther was peace, the first thing they would have done, would be to align themselves with france, and begin an industrial build up. A good numbers of slaves were freed by the south during the course of the wat, promising freedom for service,
-
- What Kind of Username is That?
- Posts: 9254
- Joined: 2002-07-10 08:53pm
- Location: Back in PA
Heh...
Not really. The south had few factories because their economy was agriculturaly geared.
Anyway, I doubt the Union or the Confederacy would've stood for very long given a confederate victory.
It creates a precedent that any state can leave whenever they like. Both nations would've quickl(within two or three decades) fallen apart into a splinter of nations.
Probably 40-50 individual nations would be the result.
Anyway, I doubt the Union or the Confederacy would've stood for very long given a confederate victory.
It creates a precedent that any state can leave whenever they like. Both nations would've quickl(within two or three decades) fallen apart into a splinter of nations.
Probably 40-50 individual nations would be the result.
I had a Bill Maher quote here. But fuck him for his white privelegy "joke".
All the rest? Too long.
All the rest? Too long.
The CSA would have lasted 10 years tops. The tensions along the border would cause another war where the CSA would be toppled by superior weapons and numbers.
There is a book called What IF? it examines this out come in detail.
There is a book called What IF? it examines this out come in detail.
"I got so high last night I figured out how clouds work." - the miracle of marijuana
Legalize It!
Proud Member of the local 404 Professional Cynics Union.
"Every Revolution carries within it the seeds of its own destruction."-Dune
Legalize It!
Proud Member of the local 404 Professional Cynics Union.
"Every Revolution carries within it the seeds of its own destruction."-Dune
- Pablo Sanchez
- Commissar
- Posts: 6998
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:41pm
- Location: The Wasteland
No they wouldn't, because that was precisely what happened in the North to make them go to war. At best the Southern Gentry had no interest in industry, and at worst they were opposed to its development in the South. And the South can hardly change their population disadvantage, because who's going to migrate to the CSA? Nobody.Azeron wrote:doubt it. A confederete victory at gettysberg would have sent the north reeling. If the confeds had one, adn ther was peace, the first thing they would have done, would be to align themselves with france, and begin an industrial build up.
Besides which, the South would have been utterly dependent on France and the UK for industrial goods. Do you think that either nation would want that to change?
But the enormous, vast majority was not, and would have even had their lot made worse.A good numbers of slaves were freed by the south during the course of the wat, promising freedom for service,
"I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unleash my dogs of war."
--The Lord Humungus
Re: Heh...
I completly agree. It gets more interesting when you consider world events, the splintering of the U.S. and C.S. would probably lead to a state where they would be too involved in their own affairs (war,political intrigue, rebellions ect.) that Germany would not see us as a threat and wouldn't provoke us into WWI. Even if some Nations/States joined the war they would have little effect on the war in europe and probably all that they would acomplish is causing the war to spread like wildfire throughout North America. Not to mention in the midst of this chaos there is always the chance we'll see a wave of marxist rebellions.FireNexus wrote:It creates a precedent that any state can leave whenever they like. Both nations would've quickl(within two or three decades) fallen apart into a splinter of nations.
Probably 40-50 individual nations would be the result.
In the long run the only real hope would be the creation of a 2nd rebublic who goals will be to promote unity,peace,and progress among its ethnicities*, and whose Constitution will build upon the first correcting its problems and being more specific on issues such as states rights. I almost forgot to mention that the 2nd republic would almost certainly stress the common language,culture,and history of its members.
* When I say ethnicities I am using it to define National background or to be more specific the Nations which join the 2nd republic e.g. Texan and Virginian will be considered a ethnicty.
Sun Sep 07, 2003 3:45 pm 666th post.
- ArmorPierce
- Rabid Monkey
- Posts: 5904
- Joined: 2002-07-04 09:54pm
- Location: Born and raised in Brooklyn, unfornately presently in Jersey
I agree about the states splintering but I think that it would be at a lowr level With The USA and CSA still existing because their are benefits in the union of states that a state won't leave unless they get really pissed off.
Brotherhood of the Monkey @( !.! )@
To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. ~Steve Prefontaine
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. ~Steve Prefontaine
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.