Page 1 of 1
The world according to Manji, Vigilantism is GOOD!
Posted: 2002-12-19 08:01pm
by Alyeska
This particular member of SB (also posts at SD, so I pitty this place as well) had the brilliant idea that EVERYTHING is the fault of the criminal. That means if you chase a criminal in your car while firing blindly at the same time, any damage you cause is the fault of the criminal.
http://kier.3dfrontier.com/forums/showt ... adid=41606
Now thats the biggest damned leap of logic I have ever seen.
Posted: 2002-12-19 08:07pm
by HemlockGrey
"So, you, ah, killed him?"
"Yes, officer."
"You killed him all over the place!"
"Yes, I did."
"With plastic explosives!"
"Yep."
"And a rocket launcher!"
"Uh-huh."
"You wasted the entire neighborhood! Look! There's a thick red paste where the Goodwill used to be!"
"The guy was trying to steal my cat."
"...your cat?"
"My cat."
"Ah. Ok, then."
-walks away-
Posted: 2002-12-19 08:09pm
by Grand Admiral Thrawn
Deimos's long lost brother?
Posted: 2002-12-19 08:13pm
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Deimos's long lost brother?
Or Deimos himself?
Posted: 2002-12-19 10:13pm
by Stormbringer
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:Deimos's long lost brother?
One of Demio's butt puppets.
Posted: 2002-12-19 10:16pm
by Ted
The Demioii.
Posted: 2002-12-19 10:20pm
by Enlightenment
Sounds suspiciously like the Pentagon's justification for bombing wedding parties (and Canadian infantry, and tribal elders, and, and....) while hunting for al Qiada.
I'd say this retard might be Shrubby except that Shrubby doesn't have the intelligence to use a message board.
Posted: 2002-12-19 10:33pm
by Ted
Enlightenment wrote:Sounds suspiciously like the Pentagon's justification for bombing wedding parties (and Canadian infantry, and tribal elders, and, and....) while hunting for al Qiada.
I'd say this retard might be Shrubby except that Shrubby doesn't have the intelligence to use a message board.
Very true that.
Posted: 2002-12-19 10:37pm
by aerius
I have nothing against shooting to kill a perp who's trying to make off with my car, or for that matter any piece of property that I own. However I can't condone reckless public endangerment while trying to stop a perp from doing so. If you have a clean shot, fine, shoot him if needed, but to engage in a movie style car chase on city streets shows a complete lack of judgement and it just boggles my mind.
Posted: 2002-12-19 11:59pm
by phongn
Enlightenment wrote:Sounds suspiciously like the Pentagon's justification for bombing wedding parties (and Canadian infantry, and tribal elders, and, and....) while hunting for al Qiada.
Ahh, you mean where at the wedding party the people were firing rifles into the air, making the pilots think they were under fire?
Posted: 2002-12-20 12:02am
by Sea Skimmer
phongn wrote:Enlightenment wrote:Sounds suspiciously like the Pentagon's justification for bombing wedding parties (and Canadian infantry, and tribal elders, and, and....) while hunting for al Qiada.
Ahh, you mean where at the wedding party the people were firing rifles into the air, making the pilots think they were under fire?
They also had a heavy machine gun.
Posted: 2002-12-20 12:03am
by Enlightenment
phongn wrote:Ahh, you mean where at the wedding party the people were firing rifles into the air, making the pilots think they were under fire?
Yep. The same site that had a magic disappearing AAA piece that no one except the USAF ever seemed to be able to find.
Posted: 2002-12-20 12:06am
by Sea Skimmer
Enlightenment wrote:phongn wrote:Ahh, you mean where at the wedding party the people were firing rifles into the air, making the pilots think they were under fire?
Yep. The same site that had a magic disappearing AAA piece that no one except the USAF ever seemed to be able to find.
Two people can pick up and carry off a weapon of the caliber the USAF reported and found a pile of shell casings from.
Posted: 2002-12-20 12:23am
by Darth Wong
Back to the subject at hand, Manji is obviously an idiot, as evidenced by his moronic giant 16"-gun tank ideas. This merely makes him a lunatic as well as an idiot. But it's not unprecedented; the "logic" that reckless use of indiscriminate force against a criminal and anyone he happens to be near (or hide behind) is acceptable and its results can be blamed on the criminal is interesting. Replace the word "criminal" with "terrorist" and this "reasoning" suddenly sounds a lot more familiar.
Posted: 2002-12-20 01:38am
by Arthur_Tuxedo
Enlightenment wrote:I'd say this retard might be Shrubby except that Shrubby doesn't have the intelligence to use a message board.
Wouldn't that be hilarious if Shrub came onto this board and got owned?
Posted: 2002-12-20 01:40am
by Einhander Sn0m4n
Arthur_Tuxedo wrote:Enlightenment wrote:I'd say this retard might be Shrubby except that Shrubby doesn't have the intelligence to use a message board.
Wouldn't that be hilarious if Shrub came onto this board and got owned?
I'd rather see him come to this board and get
0\/\/|\|3|)!