StarDestroyer.Net BBS

We know that someone who's anti-women or hates women is a misogynist, but is there a name for someone who's anti-men or hates men?

And no feminist jokes, please. It's a serious question, as I might be a mild one.

Misandronist.

Bitch.

I should have thought that was obvious.

I believe the word is Feminist. Tho bitch is a good synonym.

I said no feminist jokes, you fucking bastards!!

What the fuck is wrong with you idiots? Don't you even read the actual content of a thread before responding?

Jesus Christ, I was serious...

One response was serious. The rest didn't have to be.

There's misanthrope, but that's humankind in general, not men in particular.

It's "misandrist."

Thank you. Now I know what I am.

hmmm.... that's not nice and for that, I'm going to have my wife abort any daughters that we might have

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Thank you. Now I know what I am.

Self-loathing is no way to go through life, kid.

Just other males in general, I'm not included. I clarify it in the "Genetic Engineering" thread, which should be split.

Part of your problem with sex is that you have allowed femi-Nazis to define it for you. You see it as an intrinsically anti-female act, hence sex-crazed males disturb you and you see them as intrinsically anti-female too.

Not at all.

I don't have a problem with the actual act of sexual intercourse or any of it's related activities, just the view that a lot of men have of it: it's soley for them. I don't like that.

I also don't like their cruelty towards everything. It's somewhat related to my hatred of sports, too.

This isn't really a "death to men" kind of dislike, but just that I dislike them and their attitudes in general.

An old UCL Union Women's Handbook wrote: Beware the male feminist, he isn't all he seems.
It could be ethno social or it may be in his genes.
Wherever the difference lies, and I don't want to make a fuss,
BUT he always wears the trousers and he isn't one of us

Once I met one such as he, a story sad but true.
I said 'No, I'm a feminist,' he siad' I am one too.'
He wanted me to fall for him, but blew it when he said,
'Of course, love; I respect you. Now, can we go to bed?'

So beware the male feminist, his motives are unsound.
Don't let him steal your heart away nor turn your head around.
Steal yourself against his charms and, even if it hurts,
Say you'll never love him until he wears the skirts.

Spanky, you're not a misandrist, just because you think that a lot of men have a freakish attitude to sex, or cruelty, or sports. You'd be a misandrist if you thought All men did.

Spanky, it sounds like you don't have a dislike for men so much as you (like me) detest the attitude of the typical teen-twentysomething male. I've got to agree with you, the casual misogny and generall assholeishness of my fellow guys really bothers me.

Yeah, Stormy, I guess that's pretty much most of what I feel. But it does bother me to the point where I would rather have girls as children.

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Yeah, Stormy, I guess that's pretty much most of what I feel. But it does bother me to the point where I would rather have girls as children.

I don't think you need to be that drastic. You just need to raise the kids right.

True, but I also want to have girls, anyway.

I was severly harassed in HS from freshman to junior year by three different unrelated parties (highly concentrated in the first and third year), so that might have a little to do with the other part of the formation of my distaste.

Oh well...

Stormbringer wrote:Spanky, it sounds like you don't have a dislike for men so much as you (like me) detest the attitude of the typical teen-twentysomething male. I've got to agree with you, the casual misogny and generall assholeishness of my fellow guys really bothers me.

I try hard to keep myself out of that catagory of men, I know I don't always succeed at that, but it doesn't stop me from trying.

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I don't have a problem with the actual act of sexual intercourse or any of it's related activities, just the view that a lot of men have of it: it's soley for them. I don't like that.

I must agree with you, this attitude disgusts me.IMO sex is for women our roles as men should be limited to pleasuring her any pleasure we get should be seen as nature's way of rewarding us for fufilling our duty.

While we're on the subject, IMO men who take advantage of women sexuaully while they're drunk should be viewed&treated as rapists. As for their punishment, first offense: 10 years in prison&counseling.
second offense: 15 years in prison&mandatory castration designed to be as painful as possible.

Personly my own annoyance with my gender stems from the fact that most of the guys I know in person are MORONS, I don't mean they're mentally handicapped, most of them could be very intelligant if they tried but they in essense they're stupid by choice!

Tosho wrote:While we're on the subject, IMO men who take advantage of women sexuaully while they're drunk should be viewed&treated as rapists. As for their punishment, first offense: 10 years in prison&counseling.
second offense: 15 years in prison&mandatory castration designed to be as painful as possible.

JESUS CHRIST! That's the most fucked-up thing I've heard all day, and I heard some fucking fucked-up things today.
Are you goddamned serious? You just said that you think that sex should be for women...yet you think that drunk women don't like having sex? Newsflash: women who go to bars/parties and get drunk to have sex do that for the same reason the men who fuck them do it...TO HAVE SEX. There's not a damn thing wrong with banging a drunk chick, as long as she's consenting. I mean, the guy in the equation is invariably drunk too, so why shouldn't the woman be accused of rape?
I think you must be thinking of those times when a woman is passed out drunk and a guy goes to town on her. But that's rape regardless of whether or not the woman is drunk, because she's not consenting. The majority of cases wherein drunken sex occurs, both parties are at least awake when the deed begins.
Would you seriously clog up prisons with guys whose only "crime" was banging a woman (maybe even their wife or girlfriend) while they were drunk?

You guys who hate guys seem to only really hate stupid guys. That's not unique. I hate stupid guys too. But I also hate stupid women. I think you guys just have some weird issues that lead you to think you're misandronists. I mean, Spanky, not to be mean or anything, but you were picked on in high school by guys, so you hate males? That's a little weird. I'm no psychologist, but I'd be willing to bet there was a sexual thing going on there; you placed rage that would normally be directed at an individual onto an entire gender. In my experience, a bully's taunting never hurts unless you want the bully's respect.
But hey, you're right, I don't know you, I can't judge you, I don't know your situation. But the thread is here, so here's my response.

Oh, and Tosho, you're just crazy.

Read through this and the Genetic Engineering thread again, this time more carefully.

Robert Treder wrote:

Tosho wrote:While we're on the subject, IMO men who take advantage of women sexuaully while they're drunk should be viewed&treated as rapists. As for their punishment, first offense: 10 years in prison&counseling.
second offense: 15 years in prison&mandatory castration designed to be as painful as possible.

JESUS CHRIST! That's the most fucked-up thing I've heard all day, and I heard some fucking fucked-up things today.
Are you goddamned serious? You just said that you think that sex should be for women...yet you think that drunk women don't like having sex? Newsflash: women who go to bars/parties and get drunk to have sex do that for the same reason the men who fuck them do it...TO HAVE SEX. There's not a damn thing wrong with banging a drunk chick, as long as she's consenting. I mean, the guy in the equation is invariably drunk too, so why shouldn't the woman be accused of rape?
I think you must be thinking of those times when a woman is passed out drunk and a guy goes to town on her. But that's rape regardless of whether or not the woman is drunk, because she's not consenting. The majority of cases wherein drunken sex occurs, both parties are at least awake when the deed begins.

The point is, that when a woman is heavily drunk, even if she's consicous, she's not thinking clearly and is not in control of her actions, and so is as unable to give consent as a fifteen year old child.
And not everybody gets drunk in order to have sex. There are other reasons for going out. I have been in a situation where I was unabel to fight off a guy, but luckily nothing happened, but because I was conscious, if he'd fucked me I wouldn't have a leg to stand on, right?
This happens all the time - a drunk woman is coerced into sex, but the guy gets off because 'she consented' - even if she has no recollectuion of what happened or didn't know or like the guy. Alcohol can be as effective as Ruhipnol, and isn't illegal.
If there was the risk of being tried for rape for a woman too inebriated to give consent, then men would think twice before doign it, and there would be fewqer rapes in these circumstances.

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Thank you. Now I know what I am.

Is that also the reason why you always use *female* Avatars?