Page 1 of 1
An exersize in alternate history VI.
Posted: 2003-01-02 02:57pm
by Tosho
This is the last one I swear.
What if Napoleon instead of invading Russia took le grande armee to the Iberian penninsula?
Posted: 2003-01-02 03:18pm
by jaeger115
For one, la grande armee wouldn't be bogged down by the russian winter. They would march swiftly through nice, warm weather, except there's always the small mountain range separating Spain and France to cross.
Once they get over the mountain, it would be difficult for them to be resupplied, cause the English controls the Channel and the wagons would have to cross the mountains. So Napoleon would be smart to take control of the Channel first.
Posted: 2003-01-02 03:30pm
by Raptor 597
The French were in Iberia, and it was a costly war which they were pushed back towards the Prynees. Napeleon would of needed some forces too hold off the Russian Horde or they would some Slavs marching across Prussia.
Posted: 2003-01-02 03:33pm
by Raptor 597
jaeger115 wrote:For one, la grande armee wouldn't be bogged down by the russian winter. They would march swiftly through nice, warm weather, except there's always the small mountain range separating Spain and France to cross.
Once they get over the mountain, it would be difficult for them to be resupplied, cause the English controls the Channel and the wagons would have to cross the mountains. So Napoleon would be smart to take control of the Channel first.
Napeleon lost control of the Channel thanks too a certain British Admiral called Horatio Nelson Trafalger. He didn't even need the Channel. If nessecary he could always run supllies from Bordeaux too Northern Spain.
Posted: 2003-01-02 03:37pm
by Tosho
Captain Lennox wrote:The French were in Iberia, and it was a costly war which they were pushed back towards the Prynees. Napeleon would of needed some forces too hold off the Russian Horde or they would some Slavs marching across Prussia.
I was aware they were in Iberia.
Posted: 2003-01-02 03:59pm
by Raptor 597
Tosho wrote:Captain Lennox wrote:The French were in Iberia, and it was a costly war which they were pushed back towards the Prynees. Napeleon would of needed some forces too hold off the Russian Horde or they would some Slavs marching across Prussia.
I was aware they were in Iberia.
Then it would be all pointless. the French the power in Iberia bu not the Supplies. If the La Grand Armee would of stopped and made camp in Paland the French could win Spain.
Posted: 2003-01-02 04:52pm
by Tosho
Captain Lennox wrote:Tosho wrote:Captain Lennox wrote:The French were in Iberia, and it was a costly war which they were pushed back towards the Prynees. Napeleon would of needed some forces too hold off the Russian Horde or they would some Slavs marching across Prussia.
I was aware they were in Iberia.
Then it would be all pointless. the French the power in Iberia bu not the Supplies. If the La Grand Armee would of stopped and made camp in Paland the French could win Spain.
Le Grande Armee could get supplies by foraging. The french were being beaten back, historically the situation deteriorated with Le Grande Armee we have a large source of reinforcments and the tactical genius of Napoleon and his best marshals. Wellington would most likley lose to Napoleon in Iberia because in addition to not having Blucher being able help him for obvious reasons the size of the french forces meant that in addition being able to command a huge force personly, Napoleon would be able to give his best marshals more troops than they usely would have. Napoleon could form a strategy involving defeating Wellington, forcing him to retreat headlong in to an ambush commanded by Oudinot then all Napoleon would need to do is pin Wellington's force down and pound it in to oblivion.