Wow, the little chicken shit uses selective quoting again (ignoring the part of my reply which states its the most important part) and runs away. Ah, did I hurt your liddle widdle feellings?
Lets sum up dumbshit boys gross stupidity for posterity.
1. Hates my story because I have the Doctor kill ALL humans on the RDA base.
He
bolded the
all part for emphasis too.
Except I didn't.
“Jake, something has happened.” Max was nearly panicking on the communicator.
“Some stranger came, called himself the Doctor and then started slaughtering the people on the base. I don’t know how he does it. What ever weapon he uses, it destroys all organic matter. Only the skeleton remains. Quaritch and Selfridge are already dead. Me and all other scientists are gathered here.. Oh god they are here.”
Jake could see it, but he couldn’t believe his eyes. The thing before him was wearing the clothes of a marine, however all that stood there was the skeleton. Shadows were starting to stretch out from it.
“No. You cannot have them.” A man stood there armed with a strange metallic wand, for want of a better word.
The being that was once a marine paused as if daring the Doctor to challenge him.
“You know what I am, and what I can do.”
Without a word the skeleton turned and walked away.
So any one reading it can see the Doctor saving the civillians and targeting the RDA mercenaries. A big difference from grossly attacking any human indescriminately, which his stupid KKK scenario postulates with killing all white people.
Naturally he avoids this point every fucking time I bring it up because it would show how poor his reading comprehension skills are.
2. The Doctor made things worse.
This boils down to him making it worse by a) lives taken vs lives saved b) leaving the Na'vi without advance technology c) hur hur revenge fantasy
Lets see, where to start. Point a is in favour of the Doctor making things better, because more Na'vi lives were saved than RDA lives taken. And thats even assuming that the life of a mercenary who attacks civilian targets is equal to someone defending their land. Case closed.
Point b is very strange and convulated and based on his assertion that the Doctor should someone contribute to uplifting them, albeit indirectly. Problem is, hey, you don't suppose the Na'vi don't want the advance technology. That repeated lines by Selfridge and Jake, and their own actions in evicting RDA would suggest that. No thats clearly not what happened. You see, lazerus here understands Avatar better than James Cameron. After all Darkstar understands paramount canon policy better than the guys in charge of it, so why not lazerus with Avatar?
You see what really really happen was just the Omaticaya deciding for ALL Na'vi that they didn't want it. An unfair proposition, because all Na'vi should have a say. Naturally when all the other Na'vi tribes side with the Omaticaya, its becomes, no the Na'vi cannot decide, because they don't have all the information. The fact that his second sentence is contradictory to his first; (after all, if the Na'vi cannot decide to want the technology, how can lazerus accuse the Omaticaya of deciding for all Na'vi); doesn't stop him there. After all, lazerus is a master of semantic whoring, which unfortunately we will see more of. His first statement is false because all the Na'vi sided with the Omaticaya, the second statement butchers the definition of decide, and in any event cannot stand because it contradicts his earlier position. Case closed.
Oh, and its hur hur revenge fantasy, blah blah wanton butchery. Funny that because I don't recall the Doctor taking revenge for something done to him. Lets be generous and assume dumbshit boy called it that as an insult. He still can't explain why that is bad (except for the fact it has a shitty name), because he just says the same "its bad bad bad" statement in a different way. This "bad" action actually saved more lives, because he stopped RDA launching an attack on the Na'vi. He can't come up with anything else other than he doesn't like it. But we can see putting forward a logical argument is a bit difficult for his hypoplastic brain.
Again my story did not show the Doctor making things worse no matter how hard he tries to spin it.
3. Accuse me of potraying the Doctor as a bigger mary sue than his own series, in other words inaccurate.
Now if I had Superman appear and butcher the RDA mercenaries and is potrayed as par the course and heroic, you might have a point there.
Now people might wonder why I am digging into him on this point when he has already conceded.. after I cited 7 examples of the Doctor's similar behaviour AFTER I had mentioned 2 other examples in previous posts. What is this, everyone else needs to obtain mountains of evidence, while he can just say hur hur <insert insulting description here> and claim victory?
4. The fic is full of it (Doctor's "dickery").
Since a lot of his criticisms didn't occur in the story, lets focus in on the only thing that did. The Doctor killing the RDA mercenaries with wanton butchery in a hur hur revenge fantasy. Presumably this is what he means by dickery. Lets have a look at the actual scene shall we.
Those were Quaritch’s last words as the Vashta Nerada made short work of him. Where before stood Miles Quaritch, head of security on Pandora, now stood an skeleton. Soon the whole human base on Pandora would feel their hunger.
Oooh lah lah. I count 39 words out of a fic of 2300 + words. A mere 39 words and the fic is full of the Doctor's dickery. Nevermind the scenes where he saves Grace and saves the Na'vi from orbital bombardment. The description of him saving the Na'vi from orbital bombardment has twice as many words dedicated to it. Most of the words in the story were taken up by either introduction and the Doctor's argument with Quaritch.
The fic is clearly "full of it." Man, what does lazerus define as "full of it"? Maybe greater than zero?
5. I can criticise things even if its not in the fic
Now people its ok for lazerus to sprout bullshit. He has reserved the option of criticising things even NOT in the story. How do we know? Why he said it himself
right here
lazerus wrote:
Sheesh, if you are going to criticise it, at least apply fair standard to things like what constitutes being "More Mary Sueish" than usual, or how about criticise ideas I made (as opposed to suggested by another poster). Yeah thats a thought.
Why the fuck should I? Your fanfic blew like a cheap whore. It's "morality" would be hilariously hypocritical if it weren't so pathetic, the writing is shitty, the characterization is worse, and it manages to make the main character so unlikeable that the RDA seems okay -- because hey, which is worse, psuedo-conquistadors or a vengeful, petty, mass-murdering god?
Yep. Why the fuck should he only criticise the things written in the story? Hmm. Have to think on that one. How about criticism of a fake thing doesn't achieve anything? How about its unfair. How about the author cannot improve if the criticisms aren't actually relevant to their story.
How ever does he get off sprouting such crap with a straight face. Must be that dope you were smoking while watching the movie or watching an episode of Doctor Who.
6. Its not genocide unless I say it is
As promised earlier we get to see more of lazerus semantic whoring par excellence. You see, I pointed out the Doctor had done worse things (by lazerus's standards naturally), ergo my characterisation is not inaccurate. Dumbshit boy's response is to argue that those things weren't really as bad as the hur hur revenge fantasy I wrote.
You see, the Doctor had to commit genocide on the Racnoss to save humanity just as he killed the RDA mercenaries to save lots of Na'vi lives. Not only did the Doctor kill lots of bad guys in "The Christmas Invasion", he also effective genocided them, while clearly there are much more humans on Earth in the Avatar universe.
The fact that the Racnoss queen and her children were the last of their kind seemingly eluded lazerus boy despite it being a plot point of the story. But thats ok, cover up your ignorance with more semantic whoring.
As far as I am concerned, killing the last Racnoss in the galaxy would consisted of 1 count of murder. That's it.
As far as he is concern, its not genocide because he said so (and he actually killed more than one in that episode).
Who gives a fuck what you think dumbass? You didn't invent the english language nor write the law books on which people can be charged with genocide. If Serbian figures can be charged with genocide even though relatives of their victims are still alive in numbers, then hell yeah, the Doctor commited genocide by leaving only the Racnoss Queen alive. Lazerus is too stupid to realise words have meaning, and genocide doesn't just have bad connotations, it actually has its own meaning.
Give that moron an A in English. A for awesomely stupid.
I was going to talk more about retard boy's RDA apologism, but fuck it. His reading comprehension skills never advanced more than primary school level anyway, so its not like he is going to understand it anyway.
Never apologise for being a geek, because they won't apologise to you for being an arsehole. John Barrowman - 22 June 2014 Perth Supernova.
Countries I have been to - 14.
Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Germany, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, USA.
Always on the lookout for more nice places to visit.