As in 'what do you mean you didn't get the signal'?Exactly, old, time-honored and trusted military strategem.
That sort of thing formed much of the humor in The Navy Lark.
Moderator: LadyTevar
Yeah I thought that was a little strange the way that happened. It's like the para commander giving up command to a Northern Alliance leader in the early days of operations in Afghanistan.Chris OFarrell wrote: The way he walked up and said that this Colonel only commands 700 people where as he commands several thousand, thus he is top dog is just pure idiocy to bow to, commands are not surrendered to non formally allied units, especially led by someone who is frankly, not competent to lead them simply because they say so...
Ah. The Wesley Clark approach . ISTR a Para officer named Jackson had a different idea when Wes tried to apply that to Pristina Airport.Chris OFarrell wrote:Yeah...I would have told Ceaser to go to hell (well a different part of it anyway).
Nor does Jackson have the authority to command Caesar and his local indigenous forces or to command Lt. Kim's superiors who presumably back him. For that matter, Kim on her own authority could tell Jackson to fuck off unless he's got orders from her chain of command. The Brits were hoping she's simply see Jackson's higher rank, salute, and fall in line. Caesar has made it unecessary for her to say that herself, but it's now been said. Jackson can accept that the Brits lost their chance, or he can make things worse. Do note that while a single battlegroup would have trouble pacifying a couple of million annoyed people unless they want to go Roman on them.Chris OFarrell wrote: The PM of Canada can't give orders to a US division at the North Pole for example. By that same Token, Ceaser has not the slightest authority to tell anyone from Earth to DO anything.
He hasn't made a claim to Hell yet. He's just pointed out that he commands the largest military force in the area of Free Hell, and used that to cockblock Jackson's attempt to browbeat Kim's force into submission via sheer rank. Then he flipped around and apparently took over Free Hell, and Kim apparently passively surrendered her command to him.He has no grounds to claim he owns hell, he is at best a minor local resistance leader, not the Emperor of millions. And he is most surely NOT in the Chain of Command of Kim or the Limey. And unless I'm mistaken, neither the US nor UK recognize Ceasers claim to hell at this point, so his response SHOULD have been 'I'll talk with my Government after this battle and let the Foreign Ministry handle this, please excuse me for now Sir'. After all, the allied Earth powers have declared War on hell and are going to take the place for themselves, thats policy from the top until the top changes it.
I'd like to see where in the chapter that Colonel Jackson actually surrenders command of his Para to Ceaser, because all that happens is that Ceaser suggests that they work together.The way he walked up and said that this Colonel only commands 700 people where as he commands several thousand, thus he is top dog is just pure idiocy to bow to, commands are not surrendered to non formally allied units, especially led by someone who is frankly, not competent to lead them simply because they say so...
Again, all Caeser does is cockblock the attempted British takeover, and then suggests that they work together. He doesn't issue any orders to the Brits, though he does appear to assume command of Kim's forces, and she lets him take command without protest. And if she's the acting commander of Free Hell, and she surrenders command to Ceaser, then that does make him the commander of Free Hell and giving him the rank equivilant of a general by virtue of the numbers of people he commands.“I have some idea, Second Consul Kim is a good teacher. But, you are right so I must ask that you remain in your position, commanding your Para. Perhaps we can get together and work out how best we can deploy your men.”
Caesar is the 'legitimate' ruler of 2 million people in hell, civilian or otherwise, and given that the defeat of hellish forces is more or less forgone, its now a political issue not a military one. Caesar has established legitimacy as a ruler, the US et al are going to have to deal with that, if for no other reason that people in hell, including the native Orc, will inevitably question the right of earth to rule in hell if for no other reason that its not their 'country'.JBG wrote:
As for Ceasar taking control, Brovane is right. He may keep his networks but when the US and the Russians et al decide that he is in the way, he is outa there. 2 million armed with sticks and rocks do not compete with those who have trashed Satan's palace etc etc ... You get my drift.
Quite. Caesar is no fool. He's a very skilled politician before he's a soldier and he knows a) He hasn't the technical background to take tactical command of 2 PARA and b) He won't want to burn his bridges with people who obviously have power and influence in Hell and on Earth - not at least until he's sure it's in his interest to do so. He's made both a practical military decision and by allowing Jackson to save face, a good political one as well. Next time HMG wants to do something relating to that in which Caesar takes interest, they'll know he's someone with whom they can deal.Peptuck wrote:
I'd like to see where in the chapter that Colonel Jackson actually surrenders command of his Para to Ceaser, because all that happens is that Ceaser suggests that they work together.r.
It will be interesting to see how GJC runs things, given the make-up of the Hellish population, Roman systems wont cut it. Certainly Earth government's will have to treat with him as a government, if only for the fact that he represents some kind of civil organisation that exists in hell to undertake governance of (liberated)Hell, and when you look at the fuck up that was/is Iraq, earth governments, esp the US, may well welcome it, so they don't have to do it themselves.R011 wrote: Effectively, 2 PARA is now under his command, but as allies, not Roman auxilliaries.
There is no current twin five inch auto-cannon. Ammo handling is easier for single mounts. Use an OtoMelara 127 mm Compact gun if you want a higher RoF than the Mark 45. Better yet, use the 76 mm Mark 75. I'm assuming the twin 40 mm L60 are really 40 mm L70? I'd also replace the mixed single 25 mm and quad .50 cal mounts with 20 mm Gatling guns., say two on the centre-line and two on each broadside. By all means, add extra single .50 cals as they can be fitted.Michael Garrity wrote:Greetings, all:
Here's my take on a vessel specifically designed to engage the Harpy aerial threat over the seas of Hell.
Why is Ceasar the "legitimate" ruler of free hell? Up to now he has been the co-ordinator etc of forces in hell that have achieved diddly-squat for millenia. Is it because historically he is a nuanced and charismatic leader? That goes just so far as he himself has had no solution to demon dominance. Imagine what his people would say given the chance of hitting back at the demons with modern technology or going back to hiding in caves and swamps awaiting the "day".Stuart Mackey wrote:Caesar is the 'legitimate' ruler of 2 million people in hell, civilian or otherwise, and given that the defeat of hellish forces is more or less forgone, its now a political issue not a military one. Caesar has established legitimacy as a ruler, the US et al are going to have to deal with that, if for no other reason that people in hell, including the native Orc, will inevitably question the right of earth to rule in hell if for no other reason that its not their 'country'.JBG wrote:
As for Ceasar taking control, Brovane is right. He may keep his networks but when the US and the Russians et al decide that he is in the way, he is outa there. 2 million armed with sticks and rocks do not compete with those who have trashed Satan's palace etc etc ... You get my drift.
Michael Garrity wrote:Duchess:
There is no specific hull design new or recent that I used as a template for this vessel. Instead, I used Springsharp to design an armed merchant vessel. When I read your posts about various vessels with lots of autocannons and HMGs, I modified the design by trading most of the cargo capacity for increased armament and a different hullform.
I will reduce the armor as you suggest. I will reduce the main belt to 2" and the upper belt to 1.5"; this will represent thickened hull plating. I'll keep the main deck at 1" and the conning tower at 2" (the CT plating will represent armor on and around the CIC) for splinter protection and also reduce the armor on the three main turrets.
As for the other types of guns you mention, what is the caliber of the 127-mm OtoMelara weapon? The 40-mm guns on the sides of the vessel were surplus Bofors; I will change the 40-mm caliber to L70 and reduce the main guns to single mounts. Unfortunately, Springsharp doesn't allow for the specification of gatling-type weaponry.
I will also experiment with mounting depth charge racks on the stern; how many racks & DC's do you recommend I add?
Mike Garrity
Because the US and UK governments have just given him de facto recognition as the local indigenous political leader. Now, higher authorities from those governments can withdraw that recognition, but by the time they do, Caesar's claim will be solidified enough that it will be much more trouble than its worth. Not to mention that the US probably doesn't much want to deploy a brigade to Free Hell in order to take control from the BritishJBG wrote:
Why is Ceasar the "legitimate" ruler of free hell?
Jonathan
I did not say he was.JBG wrote:Why is Ceasar the "legitimate" ruler of free hell?Stuart Mackey wrote:Caesar is the 'legitimate' ruler of 2 million people in hell, civilian or otherwise, and given that the defeat of hellish forces is more or less forgone, its now a political issue not a military one. Caesar has established legitimacy as a ruler, the US et al are going to have to deal with that, if for no other reason that people in hell, including the native Orc, will inevitably question the right of earth to rule in hell if for no other reason that its not their 'country'.JBG wrote:
As for Ceasar taking control, Brovane is right. He may keep his networks but when the US and the Russians et al decide that he is in the way, he is outa there. 2 million armed with sticks and rocks do not compete with those who have trashed Satan's palace etc etc ... You get my drift.
No, its because he is responsible for over 2 million people.Up to now he has been the co-ordinator etc of forces in hell that have achieved diddly-squat for millenia. Is it because historically he is a nuanced and charismatic leader?
That does not follow, indeed its irrelevant. GJC commands/coordinates over two million persons, that is legitimacy by virtue of millennia of incumbency. But more to the point who the fuck gave the US or any other sonofabitch the right to run hell over the wishes of the people who live there and cannot leave?That goes just so far as he himself has had no solution to demon dominance. Imagine what his people would say given the chance of hitting back at the demons with modern technology or going back to hiding in caves and swamps awaiting the "day".
Jonathan
Show me where I said GJC was running the patch of dirt known as "Free Hell" or admit you just lied . Cause I just looked back and I said no such thing.JBG wrote:"I did not say he was. "
I am going on what you have posted. If you don't mean "X" you shouldn't state "X". I quoted your statement that he was the "legitimate" ruler. Look at your own post before you criticise others or try to recreate history.
Oh, I am sorry, you must have missed the chapter where he told Kim that he commanded over two million people.You further have yet to explain how he is responsible. What does "responsible" in your universe entail?? You keep on coming out with these bland statements yet when challenged you accept no ownership - see "legitimate" above.
Fuck off, wanker.Its a case of "sorry squire, I have scratched the record".
And no offence intended, as my Kiwi mate would put it.
Jonathan
Methinks someone has a reading comprehension problem. The statement and your response to it did not match.JBG wrote:Why is Ceasar the "legitimate" ruler of free hell?Stuart Mackey wrote:Caesar is the 'legitimate' ruler of 2 million people in hell ...
He did say that the belt armour, at any rate, was to simulate strengthened hull plating rather than armour per se.The Duchess of Zeon wrote:
I recommended nothing about armour, because no armour would be fitted-
Actually, so far as the program he using is concerned, it's 1950. If you know of a program that simulates modern ships, please let us know.you have to stop thinking like this is 1940, it's not.
Also, for mobilization you go with the hulls you already have.
Because it's fun? It's no more unrealistic or invalid than taking existing ships and sticking on WWII guns as if it were just a plastic model kit. In real life (do recall that this is just a story), such mods would take real naval architects working with real ships a lot more work.Why are you trying to go through the complex process of designing an entirely new ship