Gil Hamilton wrote:I find it interesting that the reporter is describing the concentration camp in Heaven as the worst ever, even compared to Auschwitz. That seems like she would say that at any concentration camp as propaganda. From the descriptions of the camp, it still sounds second class compared the the absurd amounts of cruelty that humans afflict on each other, even for political reasons. Belial could take lessons from the SS or the Khmer Rouge. Not even a Grand Duke of the underworld is as good at creating Hell as human beings are.
Please remember this is a TV journalist speaking. Since when did one of them know what they were talking about or get anything substantially right? Yes, I agree with everything both of you say and if I was speaking as a hired talking head on TV, I'd be saying exactly what you are. But I'm not. The speaking character is a TV bimbo who was probably doing the weather forecast six months ago and will be doing the sports results in six months time. It would be horrendously out of character for her to produce anything other than rather hackneyed imagery. Concentration camp - - - Auschwitz. Massacre - - - - Rwanda. Please remember, in any story, characters speak for themselves, not for the author. They get things wrong, they make mistakes, they say things that would cause the author to strangle himself if he tried to do the same. The criteria is always would the character say this, not would the author say this or this is right or even I agree with this.Hofner1962 wrote:These angels are political prisoners. Most of the initial inmates of the Nazi concentration camps were political prisoners. There were over 20,000 when the war officially broke out. The mass incarceration of Jews came later.
Oh, I can do the soul-crushing horror bit but I think its much more effective if one doesn't. It's better left to the reader's imagination; concentrate on a superficial description, record people's reaction to it and let the reader's imagination do the rest. They'll put their own personal horrors into there and the result is so much better.morilore wrote:I think it's just - and no offense Stuart - that the author isn't really good at describing scenes of soul-crushing horror and cruelty, so it becomes an informed attribute. All the characters are reacting to this camp in a way that suggests Elie Wiesel's Night, but it isn't actually described much to the reader, nor is the plight of the angels within