Army Divisions meet re-up targets..

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Army Divisions meet re-up targets..

Post by MKSheppard »

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national ... -9161r.htm

Army divisions hit re-up targets

By Rowan Scarborough
THE WASHINGTON TIMES

Army divisions that fought the past 12 months in Iraq have met virtually every re- enlistment goal, a sign that the all-volunteer force remains strong under the stress of frequent deployments and hazardous duty.

The Pentagon has been closely monitoring the re-up rate for five Army divisions that fought in Iraq for about a year. Some officials feared the time away from home and the gritty duty would prompt a large soldier exodus. After all, the war on terrorism is unchartered territory. The 30- year-old volunteer Army has never been this busy in combat.

But numbers compiled this week for the first half of fiscal 2004 show that those five combat units met, or nearly met, all retention targets for enlisted soldiers — the privates, corporals and sergeants who total 416,000 of the Army's 490,000 active force.

"This tends to rebut armchair critics who said the sky is falling and the vultures are circling and the Army is gong to lose all its troops," said Lt. Col. Franklin Childress, an Army spokesman at the Pentagon. "This is not true. The soldiers get it."

The Army also met its recruiting goal of 73,800 inductees last fiscal year, and 34,000 for the first six months of this fiscal year, which began Oct. 1.

"Soldiers are extremely resilient," said Col. Elton Manske, chief of the enlisted division at Army headquarters in the Pentagon. "There is absolutely no sign of a 'hollow Army.' Soldiers are continuing to re- enlist at least at historic rates."

The term "hollow Army" came into vogue in the post-Vietnam War 1970s to describe a force that lacked sufficient soldiers to adequately fill combat units.

Officials attribute the soldiers' recent votes of confidence to love of job, patriotism and cash. The Army in December created a new, $68 million pot that paid soldiers up to $10,000 to re-enlist and stay in their current unit for 12 months.

Col. Manske said word of the coming bonus caused some soldiers to delay hitching up until January, causing first- quarter targets to be missed. The Army overall now stands at 99 percent of re- enlistment goals and expects to exceed 100 percent by year's end on Sept. 30, he said.

"Bonuses had a significant effect," he said.

A nervous Army headquarters is expressing sighs of relief. In-country surveys showed morale was low among many soldiers, as they spent months in post-Saddam Hussein Iraq fighting a murderous insurgency of Ba'athists and foreign fighters. Nearly 600 service members have been killed since the war began March 19, 2003. Some lawmakers said the country needed to reinstate mandatory conscription — the draft — to find enough soldiers.

But as of Wednesday, when the first half of fiscal 2004 ended, all but one of the five divisions met goals to retain three critical category soldiers — first term, midterm and careerist. Army-wide last year, a goal of 51,000 re-enlistments was exceeded.

The 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Bragg, N.C., a unit of 15,000 that saw 36 members killed in Iraq, missed first quarter targets, but made up ground the past three months and is now on its way to meet year-end goals, Army officials said.

The storied 82nd has been as busy as any military unit, sending brigades to both Afghanistan and Iraq to fight the Taliban, al Qaeda terrorists and pro-Saddam insurgents in the extremely volatile town of Fallujah.

"The division has been very stressed," its commander, Maj. Gen. Charles H. Swannack Jr., told reporters in Baghdad last month. "The one thing, I think, that helps cope ... is that we get predictability in our troops' schedule. That's what they need to know is when the time is they'll be deployed."

The goal the last three months was to re-sign 422 first-termers, and the division signed up 463, while the target of 140 midcareer paratroopers was exceeded by 26.

"We have soldiers in the 82nd who are kind of unique," said Master Sgt. Pam Smith, a division spokeswoman. "They are two-time volunteers. They volunteer to come into the military, and they volunteer to go airborne. These are special soldiers because they enjoy what they do. You have to be special to want to jump out of airplanes."

Sgt. Smith said the division missed first-quarter targets during October to December largely because some soldiers waited to deploy before signing up to capitalize on tax-free bonuses overseas.

The division achieved 2003 goals by retaining 120 percent of the retention targets. Its six-month rate now stands at 92 percent.

Four other Army divisions played large roles in subduing Iraq:

•The 101st Airborne, which sent helicopter-borne soldiers to Baghdad's eastern flank and then patrolled northern Iraq, has achieved 107 percent of its retention mark.

•The 4th Infantry Division arrived in Iraq after Baghdad fell April 9. It was assigned the toughest-to-tame corridor, from Baghdad to Tikrit, as soldiers took down scores of cells of pro-Saddam insurgents and led the operation to capture Saddam himself Dec. 13. New numbers showed it achieved 117 percent of its retention goals.

•The 3rd Infantry division led the three-week charge from Kuwait to Baghdad, then battled insurgents in the Iraqi capital before turning the job over to the 1st Armored Division from Germany.

The 1st Armored Division is now vacating Baghdad after mounting months of counterinsurgency operations to break up more than 20 pro-Saddam cells. The division reports it met 120 percent of its re- enlistment goals the past six months.

"All of our indications right now make us guardedly optimistic we will in fact achieve all of our retention objectives," said Col. Manske. "We are in somewhat unchartered territory here as these deployments continue. We're looking at new and different ways to try to predict soldier behavior."
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
consequences
Homicidal Maniac
Posts: 6964
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:06pm

Post by consequences »

Which just goes to show, if you give American soldiers lots of money, tax-free, and the opportunity to shoot people, they can be patriotic.
God bless those greedy trigger-happy bastards. *salutes*
Image
Nathan F
Resident Redneck
Posts: 4979
Joined: 2002-09-10 08:01am
Location: Around the corner
Contact:

Post by Nathan F »

Ah, tax free stuff, one of the many benefits of having a Commissary card and access the BX/PX. ;)
consequences
Homicidal Maniac
Posts: 6964
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:06pm

Post by consequences »

Nathan F wrote:Ah, tax free stuff, one of the many benefits of having a Commissary card and access the BX/PX. ;)
Not just tax-free stuff, as soon as you set foot in a combat zone, the government can't tax your income as a soldier(its actually a little more complicated than that, basically you get last month's deduction added to your account every month after the first). With bonuses, this really matters, as the government basically chops 40% of the amount straight off the top(that's if you are in basically the lowest tax bracket, I don't know how it works out higher up).
Image
User avatar
Tsyroc
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13748
Joined: 2002-07-29 08:35am
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Post by Tsyroc »

consequences wrote:Which just goes to show, if you give American soldiers lots of money, tax-free, and the opportunity to shoot people, they can be patriotic.
God bless those greedy trigger-happy bastards. *salutes*
I had forgotten about that. :D

Oh, an when consequences says tax free he means they aren't paying any income taxes on any of their pay while they are in Iraq. I think the only thing they would be paying is social security taxes.

You'd be surprised how much more money you make when you have no taxes and you are also getting hazard pay and/or hostile fire pay.

I'm still surprised that the Army has been able to meet it's recruiting and reenlistment goals. I guess that in the future it might mean that more of the people in the Army are there to be in the Army and not necessarilly to just put in their time and get money for college.
By the pricking of my thumb,
Something wicked this way comes.
Open, locks,
Whoever knocks.
User avatar
Tsyroc
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13748
Joined: 2002-07-29 08:35am
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Post by Tsyroc »

consequences wrote: Not just tax-free stuff, as soon as you set foot in a combat zone, the government can't tax your income as a soldier(its actually a little more complicated than that, basically you get last month's deduction added to your account every month after the first). With bonuses, this really matters, as the government basically chops 40% of the amount straight off the top(that's if you are in basically the lowest tax bracket, I don't know how it works out higher up).
I think I was only ever tax-free for 3-4 months max. Besides being really obvious when it's in effect it also comes back to help you at tax time because since so much of your pay is tax free you end up in a much lower tax bracket so you also end up getting money back from the government.
By the pricking of my thumb,
Something wicked this way comes.
Open, locks,
Whoever knocks.
User avatar
Tsyroc
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13748
Joined: 2002-07-29 08:35am
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Post by Tsyroc »

I am curious to see how the military reserve figures go.

It's been my impression that the government has been ass fucking (not in the good way) the reserves the last ten years. Most people do not join the reserves to have their civilian lives disrupted every time the government decides it wants the active duty military to do a job that's too big for it.

Most people in the reserves are there for the cash and for national emergencies. I doubt most of them consider the invasion of another country as a national emergency and this is the second time in ~ 10 years when the reserves have been called up for an iffy threat. (I'm showing my own Jacksonian leanings here. :wink: See Shep's thread on The American Psyche).
HemlockGrey
Fucking Awesome
Posts: 13834
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:21pm

Post by HemlockGrey »

How large is the active army compared to the reserves, and what percent of those troops are combat troops?
The End of Suburbia
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses

"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
consequences
Homicidal Maniac
Posts: 6964
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:06pm

Post by consequences »

HemlockGrey wrote:How large is the active army compared to the reserves, and what percent of those troops are combat troops?
These days, the Reserves/National Guard are probably a lot bigger than the Active component. The division is supposed to be NG-combat arms, Reserves-support IIRC. Even in a combat division, I think the ration of shooters to other is 1:2, but I'm not sure about overall figures.
Image
Post Reply