THERE IS A GOD! Charisma Carpenter in Playboy!

Darth Yoshi · Post by **Darth Yoshi** » 2004-04-28 10:41pm

Nice...

Post by **RogueIce** » 2004-04-28 10:44pm

Tsyroc wrote:IIRC Andrea Thompson was in Playboy too.

Andrea Thompson

Picture

A non-nude pic for RogueIce

*salutes*

If only all Naval officers looked like that...

Patrick Degan · Post by **Patrick Degan** » 2004-04-29 12:12am

Tsyroc wrote:I don't know where this one is from and even though a flag shouldn't really be used that way I find myself having trouble getting upset about it.

picture

That's Old Glory. Perfect —makes her look like a classic Varga girl from World War II.

General Zod · Post by **General Zod** » 2004-04-29 08:33am

Phantasee wrote:
Metrion Cascade wrote:
Tsyroc wrote:You know what, go here. They are just varying degrees of tasteful Playboy style nudes. If that's off limits for you or wherever you are located don't click on the link.

I will warn people that some of the advertisements that are at the top of the site are for porn sites.
Perfect nipples and areolae...
Easy there...And yes, I would like to get a more detailed examination of these pictures...where are the full nudes? PM me. Please.

that's pretty much as close to fulll nude as you're going to find that isn't fake. If they exist i would have found them by now.

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2004-04-29 08:35am

Metrion Cascade wrote:I hope you keep that VI for a long time, asshole.

I've pulled that stunt before, works everytime.

Bob the Gunslinger · Post by **Bob the Gunslinger** » 2004-04-29 08:51pm

Darth_Zod wrote:
Oni Koneko Damien wrote:Wow, this is almost as good as when whatsername who played Ivanova from B5 posed for Playboy.

-Damien
Claudia Christian. and it's better, as charisma carpenter is hotter.

Yeah, but she's not as kinky and freaky (either her character or the actress).

Besides, Ivanova is God.

Dooey Jo · Post by **Dooey Jo** » 2004-04-30 10:21am

Are you all BSing about the existance of this URL I keep reading about?

Tsyroc · Post by **Tsyroc** » 2004-04-30 11:01am

Dooey Jo wrote:Are you all BSing about the existance of this URL I keep reading about?

No, I posted a link in an earlier post that went to the Playboy pictures.

I haven't checked to see if it's still active though.

No pr0n allowed in public forums. Please post your pr0n links to the appropriate linkage thread in HOS or I will whip you with scented bootlaces.

Jason von Evil · Post by **Jason von Evil** » 2004-04-30 01:32pm

I've seen the pictures.

Her breasts are different from what I imagined them to be.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-04-30 01:43pm

Aya wrote:I've seen the pictures.

Her breasts are different from what I imagined them to be.

Indeed. They are far too perfect to simply be imagined. They must be experienced.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-04-30 01:52pm

Durandal wrote:
Aya wrote:I've seen the pictures.

Her breasts are different from what I imagined them to be.
Indeed. They are far too perfect to simply be imagined. They must be experienced.

Of course, if your statement is taken literally it means that you probably have touched Ms. Carpenter's breasts.

Batman · Post by **Batman** » 2004-04-30 07:04pm

Peregrin Toker wrote:
Durandal wrote:
Aya wrote:I've seen the pictures.
Her breasts are different from what I imagined them to be.
Indeed. They are far too perfect to simply be imagined. They must be experienced.
Of course, if your statement is taken literally it means that you probably have touched Ms. Carpenter's breasts.

I can only assume that was wishful thinking rather than speaking from experience. Because otherwise I would have to kill Durandal, which I'm not allowed to do.
Stupid oath.

Post by **Dalton** » 2004-04-30 08:06pm

Tsyroc, sorry about editing just that one post; I didn't realize that everyone decided to start posting links to porn in public forums

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-04-30 08:07pm

Who said anything about porn? Topless pictures are only "porn" according to John Asscroft. In the civilized world, they're just pictures.

Batman · Post by **Batman** » 2004-04-30 09:05pm

Darth Wong wrote:Who said anything about porn? Topless pictures are only "porn" according to John Asscroft. In the civilized world, they're just pictures.

Indeed. Every once in a blue moon I do actually love being german...

Post by **Dalton** » 2004-04-30 09:08pm

Darth Wong wrote:Who said anything about porn? Topless pictures are only "porn" according to John Asscroft. In the civilized world, they're just pictures.

Well, Mike, I don't know what the limit is...so...*shrug*

He can repost that link I guess.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-04-30 09:14pm

Dalton wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Who said anything about porn? Topless pictures are only "porn" according to John Asscroft. In the civilized world, they're just pictures.
Well, Mike, I don't know what the limit is...so...*shrug*

He can repost that link I guess.

The rule here is that it's not porn as long as you can't see genitalia.

Montcalm · Post by **Montcalm** » 2004-04-30 09:14pm

Dalton wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Who said anything about porn? Topless pictures are only "porn" according to John Asscroft. In the civilized world, they're just pictures.
Well, Mike, I don't know what the limit is...so...*shrug*

He can repost that link I guess.

This is in the acceptable limits its far from being full frontal with a biology course attached to it.......meaning when there's a zoom in on the girls genitals.

Post by **Dalton** » 2004-04-30 09:27pm

Darth Wong wrote:
Dalton wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Who said anything about porn? Topless pictures are only "porn" according to John Asscroft. In the civilized world, they're just pictures.
Well, Mike, I don't know what the limit is...so...*shrug*

He can repost that link I guess.
The rule here is that it's not porn as long as you can't see genitalia.

Oh, OK. IIRC, in that link I edited out there were definitely gonads.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-04-30 09:32pm

Dalton wrote:Oh, OK. IIRC, in that link I edited out there were definitely gonads.

We definitely need a "no visible gonads" rule.

Batman · Post by **Batman** » 2004-04-30 09:32pm

The link is still active in the FIRST post Tsyroc provided it in (sloppy, Dalton, Sloppy

), but just to ensure everybody gets to enjoy the gorgeousness of Charisma Carpenter...
here

Now, how about we ask CrimsonRaine who that mysterious 'something' is so we can kick its teeth in and force it to ask Ms Hannigan to reconsider?

Batman · Post by **Batman** » 2004-04-30 09:35pm

Dalton wrote:
Darth Wong wrote: The rule here is that it's not porn as long as you can't see genitalia.
Oh, OK. IIRC, in that link I edited out there were definitely gonads.

OK. Since there WEREN'T any in the link Tsyroc posted, I now officially request the one you think you edited out.
Yes, I know you can't post it here. So PM me.

Post by **Dalton** » 2004-04-30 09:39pm

Mike: Yes.

Batman: I remember seeing vag...and don't get uppity with me

Post by **haas mark** » 2004-04-30 09:41pm

Darth Wong wrote:
Dalton wrote:Oh, OK. IIRC, in that link I edited out there were definitely gonads.
We definitely need a "no visible gonads" rule.

Yar.. this be why I keep a strict "no bush" rule in the BotM.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2004-04-30 10:59pm

Darth Wong wrote:Who said anything about porn? Topless pictures are only "porn" according to John Asscroft. In the civilized world, they're just pictures.

Actually, LOTS of fundies apart from John Ashcroft also think that topless chicks counts as porn. Of course, that does nothing to rebut the point, which is that they're not porno, but still....