Saddam May Have Been Planning The Insurgency From The Start

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Saddam May Have Been Planning The Insurgency From The Start

Post by Aaron »

From Globalsecurity.org
Globalsecurity.org wrote:Saddam's agents planned bomb attacks before invasion: Pentagon

In-Depth Coverage
By Peter Mackler

WASHINGTON (AFP) - A branch of Saddam Hussein's secret service is behind a wave of bombings and other attacks in Iraq in a guerrilla campaign planned even before the US-led invasion, according to a newly disclosed Pentagon report.

The insurgency waged by a directorate of the old Iraqi intelligence service called M-14 was disclosed last week in congressional testimony by Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, with details elaborated Thursday by The New York Times.

Wolfowitz submitted a report from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) on the M-14, ironically dubbed by Saddam the anti-terrorism directorate, that specialised in hijackings, assassinations and bombings.

The report said former M-14 agents were "currently involved in planning and conducting (attacks throughout Iraq with) numerous improvised explosive devices, vehicle-borne improvised explosive devices and radio-controlled improvised explosive devices."

Wolfowitz said they were also the source of the "fairly sophisticated explosives" taking a toll on US forces as they battle insurgents in the Sunni Muslim stronghold of Fallujah and elsewhere.

The explosives section of M-14 began preparing the campaign before the March 19, 2003 invasion, constructing hundreds of suicide vests and belts for use by the elite Saddam Fedayeen militia, Wolfowitz told Congress.

He said the Iraqi intelligence service established cells in an organisation that was "purposely decentralized so attacks could be carried out in the event that cell leaders were captured and killed."

As US troops drove on Baghdad last April, officers expressed concern that significant portions of the Republican Guard, Saddam Fedayeen and other Iraqi forces were melting away with their weapons.

But the new Pentagon report was the first indication that Saddam, who was captured in December, might have been planning for guerrilla warfare at the outset. US officials still refer to insurgents as isolated thugs and terrorists.

The New York Times quoted US officials as saying M-14 officers were responsible for "the majority of attacks" today in Iraq.

One senior US official who read the seven-page DIA report told the Times "we know the M-14 is operating in Fallujah and Ramadi," two bastions of resistance to the occupation west of Baghdad.

The paper said the guerrilla plan was dubbed "The Challenge Project" and was drafted as US-led forces prepared to strike Iraq. It called for M-14 officers to scatter and lead an insurgency using bombings and other attacks.

"They carefully laid plans to occupy the occupiers," another US official told the Times. "They were prepared to try and hijack the country. The goal was to complicate the stabilization mission and democratization" of Iraq.

John Pike, director of the GlobalSecurity.org defense think tank, said early plans for guerrilla warfare could be one explanation for the collapse of the Iraqi army as US-led forces rolled through the desert last year.

Pike also said the sudden burst in kidnappings of foreigners this month was likely the work of one group, perhaps M-14. "The good news is that that has stopped. The bad news is that I assume it can get turned back on."

Retired army general William Nash, a military analyst with the Council on Foreign Relations, said the guerrilla insurgency could have been an early contingency plan that only blossomed later.

Otherwise, Nash asked, why was there not a better plan to hide and protect Saddam, who was found dirty and unkempt in a spider hole underneath a farm near his hometown of Tikrit?

Saddam was not military genius, said Nash, also a consultant for television. But since his arrest "other people have taken over and more and more it (the insurgency) seems to be a directed effort."

"It's clear that they have not only been able to sustain some organisation but to rebuild and recruit," he said.
Personally I wouldn't have thought that Saddam would have this kind of foresight, but it's apperent that someone has been planning this for a while.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Saddam isn't nearly stupid enough to have not planned for this sort of thing. He might have been very delusional at times but logic always soaks though and has a prepared guerrilla campaign awaiting the invasion would be useful regardless as to wither or not he thought he could acutally win that fight. Such forces would also be useful for fighting another popular uprising which Saddam greatly feared.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Durandal
Bile-Driven Hate Machine
Posts: 17927
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Post by Durandal »

Otherwise, Nash asked, why was there not a better plan to hide and protect Saddam, who was found dirty and unkempt in a spider hole underneath a farm near his hometown of Tikrit?
Good question. Maybe Saddam's boys decided to fuck him and grab power for themselves.
Damien Sorresso

"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
Post Reply