Well, I don't know about the book, but I didn't get that idea at all from the film. Did they even mention God in the film. It seemed to me that the overall message was not "playing God is bad," but "Man should not underestimate the adaptability and resourcefulness of life." Really, things in Jurassic Park could have worked out just fine, if not for that moron Nedry, and the fact that the "genius" scientists didn't do their homework about frog sex changes.Jurassic Park had the same "playing God is bad ... mmmmkay?" message that Godsend probably will. Both movies show humans manipulating genetics and then everything going to Hell afterward presumably because humans are arrogant and scientist are crazy people who want to usurp The One True God. Both movies make their respective scenarios out to be inevitable because of divine retribution or some such implied nonsense.
Godsend, on the other hand, I definitely get that feeling from it's trailer. I'm assuming the movie has something to do about the kid not having a "soul" because he's a clone, or something stupid like that.
And everytime it comes up, I think the exact same thing as Innerbrat: "Oh great, more propaganda to set back genetic research." It's the same kind of hollywood shit that keeps nuclear power from being more frequently used (because everyone knows the plants will explode violently, and then the giant ants will eat us !!111!!).Anyway, I don't get out to the movies much, but other trailers that I've scoffed at are Son of Mask (God, why? The first movie was made 10 years ago!), Garfield, Day After Tomorrow, and that "Meangirls" movie, mainly because it seems like every time I turn on the TV I'm bombarded with messages about how it's the "number one movie in America", which does nothing to help my overall lack of faith in the intelligence of the average American.
Uhh, looked pretty awsome to me. 
