The Anti-Porn Guy

[XPViking]

Wicked Pilot,

Aren't you missing some of those Elite Fitness people?

XPViking

[Jonsan]

If you are going to ridicule someone, at least give support. Don't just say, "this guy is an idiot"

[weemadando]

If you are going to ridicule someone, at least give support. Don't just say, "this guy is an idiot"

If you saw the turnover rate for morons in this place you'd understand why we are somewhat abrupt.

And welcome to this den of iniquity.

[Jonsan]

Well done Cyril. Let's hope that Newspeak doesn't go into effect anytime soon...

[Jonsan]

The word homophobic does not mean that someone disagrees with the act of homosexuality. That was a reply to a post a while ago...

[Darth Wong]

Damn zealots. Gives the US a bad name. I just hope he never comes to San Francisco. The gays, drug users, liberals, and people who aren't white will drive him nuts. Hey, there's an idea. Abduct him, bring him to good old SF. Tie him up, and drive around the city.

Better yet, drop his pimply ass in the middle of an Al-Quaeda training camp.

[weemadando]

The word homophobic does not mean that someone disagrees with the act of homosexuality. That was a reply to a post a while ago...

But why do you fear them? Are you feeling threatened? Repulsed? Whats the problem?

[Jonsan]

And isn't a "fag" a cigarette anyway?

It's also short for fagotte, for all music majors out there (especially the bassoon players)

[Jonsan]

But why do you fear them? Are you feeling threatened? Repulsed? Whats the problem?

I never said that I feared them. I was simply stating that someone misused the word. I suppose I should have quoted them but I just figured out how to do that. Homosexuals do not repulse or threaten me unless they try to make a move on me.

[Darth Wong]

If you are going to ridicule someone, at least give support. Don't just say, "this guy is an idiot"

Others have already done so. And quite frankly, this lunatic's arguments are so mindlessly idiotic that their stupidity is self-evident and does not require formal rebuttal anyway.

If some guy says that 2+2=5, would you be shocked if somebody else simply told him he was an idiot, rather than dragging out math textbooks to explain the problem to him?

[Jonsan]

Damn zealots. Gives the US a bad name. I just hope he never comes to San Francisco. The gays, drug users, liberals, and people who aren't white will drive him nuts. Hey, there's an idea. Abduct him, bring him to good old SF. Tie him up, and drive around the city.

Better yet, drop his pimply ass in the middle of an Al-Quaeda training camp.

That sounds quite painful. However I doubt they could aim well enough with AK-47s to actually hit him with a bullet. Although I suppose that enough of them shooting at once would do the trick.

[weemadando]

But why do you fear them? Are you feeling threatened? Repulsed? Whats the problem?

I never said that I feared them. I was simply stating that someone misused the word. I suppose I should have quoted them but I just figured out how to do that. Homosexuals do not repulse or threaten me unless they try to make a move on me.

OK, fair point.

But its still flattering when a gay guy does make a move, if slightly worrying (I didn't think I was dressing *that* fruity).

[Jonsan]

If some guy says that 2+2=5, would you be shocked if somebody else simply told him he was an idiot, rather than dragging out math textbooks to explain the problem to him?

Some people don't find the subject of homosexuality to be as easily discussed as whether or not 2+2=5.

[Jonsan]

But why do you fear them? Are you feeling threatened? Repulsed? Whats the problem?

I never said that I feared them. I was simply stating that someone misused the word. I suppose I should have quoted them but I just figured out how to do that. Homosexuals do not repulse or threaten me unless they try to make a move on me.

OK, fair point.

But its still flattering when a gay guy does make a move, if slightly worrying (I didn't think I was dressing *that* fruity).

I'd be happier if I could get some chicks to make a move--for the record no guy ever has a made a move on me. Well, there was that one time in chess.

[Jonsan]

But why do you fear them? Are you feeling threatened? Repulsed? Whats the problem?

I never said that I feared them. I was simply stating that someone misused the word. I suppose I should have quoted them but I just figured out how to do that. Homosexuals do not repulse or threaten me unless they try to make a move on me.

[Darth Wong]

If some guy says that 2+2=5, would you be shocked if somebody else simply told him he was an idiot, rather than dragging out math textbooks to explain the problem to him?

Some people don't find the subject of homosexuality to be as easily discussed as whether or not 2+2=5.

"Some people" are bigots. They read significance into homosexuality beyond that which exists. They place moral value on sexual orientation without a shred of explanation why, other than the same idiotic hasty generalizations and "nature's intent" fallacies employed by racists.

[Jonsan]

"Some people" are bigots. They read significance into homosexuality beyond that which exists. They place moral value on sexual orientation without a shred of explanation why, other than the same idiotic hasty generalizations and "nature's intent" fallacies employed by racists.

Okay, that is fair about "some people." Others believe that homosexuality is wrong for another reason which is hardly that it is "nature's intent." I don't believe that the Bible is full of "idiotic hasty generalizations...employed by racists." RACISTS????!!!! I was under the impression that racists were people who discriminated against people of other races.

[weemadando]

Okay, that is fair about "some people." Others believe that homosexuality is wrong for another reason which is hardly that it is "nature's intent."

So what do you believe? Is homosexuality wrong because the bible says so?

I don't believe that the Bible is full of "idiotic hasty generalizations...employed by racists."

Go to WCOTC, watch those monkeys for a day or so then come back and tell me that you the bible isn't full of idiotic hasty generalisations employed by racists.

And what do you personally believe? That the bible is correct in its accounts of events and should be used as a guide for living?

RACISTS????!!!! I was under the impression that racists were people who discriminated against people of other races.

The term has been used out of context there. I think "narrow minded, fundamentalist, right-wing, moronic, hat-fucking, crack-smoking, donkey-raping, bigoted sons of their sisters" may be a better term.

Sorry if you find that offensive, but like I said, we are a bit jaded from fighting some absolute fucking morons all the time.

[Zaia]

Okay, that is fair about "some people." Others believe that homosexuality is wrong for another reason which is hardly that it is "nature's intent."

So what do you believe? Is homosexuality wrong because the bible says so?

be careful what you say, jonsan--there is a HUGE abyss just waiting to envelope you. *drops a penny down there and hears--nothing, and then--s'more nothing*

take a look at www.wcotc.com before you reply. i know (read: hope) you can't possibly want to be associated with these--what was their official title? ahhh, yes: narrow minded, fundamentalist, right-wing, moronic, hat-fucking, crack-smoking, donkey-raping, bigoted sons of their sisters. that was it.

[Jonsan]

So what do you believe? Is homosexuality wrong because the bible says so?

Homosexuality is wrong because it goes directly against anything God intended. I realize that you don't believe this, but that is my answer to that. Oh and I have proof--wait, nevermind, it's from the Bible. Which brings me to my next point.

Go to WCOTC, watch those monkeys for a day or so then come back and tell me that you the bible isn't full of idiotic hasty generalisations employed by racists.

I don't even know what WCOTC is however I'd like you to inform me on this. Whatever it is, I'm sure that it doesn't make up the entire Christian population of the world.

And what do you personally believe? That the bible is correct in its accounts of events and should be used as a guide for living?

Yes, I usually mean what I say.

The term has been used out of context there. I think "narrow minded, fundamentalist, right-wing, moronic, hat-fucking, crack-smoking, donkey-raping, bigoted sons of their sisters" may be a better term.

If you indeed knew what the Bible talked about you would find that:
1. I am most certainly not narrow-minded. Since I have chosen to state my thoughts on this site, it is obvious that I am not some narrow-minded fool or else I would have given up after the first response to my first posting.
2. Yes, I am right-wing.
3. Moronic. I doubt that.
4. Hat-fucking. How do you fuck a hat anyway?
5. Crack-smoking. No, that would be the people who live near me.
6. Donkey-raping. I have never raped, let alone had sex with any animal, which includes donkeys.
7. Bigoted son of my sister. Help me, I'm confused. I don't think that anywhere in the Bible it says that incest is right, so why would I do that?

[Kelly Antilles]

*points up* WHo found the new bible thumper?

[Kelly Antilles]

And isn't a "fag" a cigarette anyway?

It's also short for fagotte, for all music majors out there (especially the bassoon players)

Yes, it's "short" for fagotte, the predecessor to the bassoon, but that is not what the instrument is called. I don't "shorten" musical instrument names.

*grumblesidiotwhothinksheknowseverythinggrumble*

[Lagmonster]

Homosexuality is wrong because it goes directly against anything God intended. I realize that you don't believe this, but that is my answer to that. Oh and I have proof--wait, nevermind, it's from the Bible.

Lad, your half-life around here just plummetted. I'm sure there are some helpful folks here who can point you to the remains of the last guy who claimed anything was right based on what the Bible says.

[Antediluvian]

Homosexuality is wrong because it goes directly against anything God intended. I realize that you don't believe this, but that is my answer to that. Oh and I have proof--wait, nevermind, it's from the Bible. Which brings me to my next point.

Look, nobody here really seems to care (with rare exceptions) what the Bible or Yaweh says about anything, okay, so your proof will be seen as laughable.

We take anything the Bible says as suspect, and for your information, homosexuality is not wrong, it's actually perfectly normal and found in the animal kingdom. Perfectly natural.

You have no case.

And for the record, we should all be glad that they are some people out there who are having sex and not reproducing, as the world is too crowded already.

[Antediluvian]

[quote]Homosexuality is wrong because it goes directly against anything God intended. I realize that you don't believe this, but that is my answer to that. Oh and I have proof--wait, nevermind, it's from the Bible. Which brings me to my next point. [quote]

Look, nobody here really seems to care (with rare exceptions) what the Bible or Yaweh says about anything, okay, so your proof will be seen as laughable.

We take anything the Bible says as suspect, and for your information, homosexuality is not wrong, it's actually perfectly normal and found in the animal kingdom. Perfectly natural.

You have no case.

And for the record, we should all be glad that they are some people out there who are having sex and not reproducing, as the world is too crowded already.