Since the word "authority" was not found in my post, I wonder who you are quoting. His job falls into the category of public relations, and he handles that job by denigrating a portion of the fanbase; do you honestly not see how he is abusing his position by doing so? If anything, the inconsequential and fan-oriented nature of his position means that it's even more important for him to avoid saying anything remotely derogatory about any portion of the fanbase.Elfdart wrote:What "authority" does Pablo have, Darth Wong? He writes a Q & A column in a fanzine where he fields questions from pre-adolescents about Gammorean Guards and Twilek Brain Tails.
If I were hiring someone to do fan relations for some kind of sci-fi series (any series) and he responded by trying to make fun of fans whose approach he doesn't like, I'd show him the door.
The fact that your entire argument on this matter consists of endlessly repeating the derogatory term "tiara-boy" and casually dismissing the whole criticism as "drama queen" and "whining" says more about you than it does about Ghost Rider or anyone else. I do like the way you decided to ignore the whole "last straw on the camel's back" analogy in your reply.The fact that people like tiara-boy come unglued over what Pablo writes says more about them than Pablo.
A thousand Star Wars fans? Not a chance; every Star Wars fan knows what the SSD is. And if they were asked to estimate how long it is relative to an ISD, they'd probably ask for a picture.Darth, if you went up to a thousand people and asked whether the SSD was 8 or 17+ km long, they would ask "What are you talking about?".
What part of "any normal person will promptly side with the movie if a picture is shown to him" did you not understand, exactly?If you asked any but the diehard fans, you'd get a blank stare or maybe a request for more information.
Again you completely ignore the point, which is that they would think the 8km figure is a goof, not the movie. Pablo is one of those people who thinks that the pride of the people who wrote tech books should override any attempt to correct mistakes therein, ie- that for the sake of continuation of "precedent", they should stick to a party line rather than trying to be faithful to the films from which this entire SW phenomenon just happened to spring.Most diehards would probably take the "official" line and say 8km unless you actually showed them the screen shots. Even in that case, most would either think it was trivial or just a goof like Han Solo's arms being bound when he's lowered into carbon freeze in TESB, but unbound when he is thawed out in ROTJ.
The question was not whether most fans think it's a matter of great importance. The question was whether most fans would side with the "what you see is what you get" interpretation of the movies over the "we have been saying the same thing in our books for 10 years now, and we don't want to rock the boat" interpretation. Hell, most fans barely even acknowledge that the non-movie material exists at all, and its lack of faithfulness to the movies is a big part of that problem.Sure I enjoy arguing over stuff like this, but I realize that I'm a tiny minority of a tiny minority. Most people -even most fans- don't care one way or the other.