Ann Coulter on the O'Reily Factor

Stuart Mackey · Post by **Stuart Mackey** » 2004-05-29 07:46am

The Kernel wrote:
Stuart Mackey wrote: Interesting, I have to say that she is far too skinny to get a rise out of me..is this woman married? lord knows she aint attractive.
She's never been married, but I wouldn't say she's unattractive (keep in mind, I still hate her guts, but this is one woman I would love to dominate for the sheer humiliation factor). Take a look at this photo (she's really not bad considering her age):

[snip]

its not her looks so much as the skinnyness combined witht the stupid crap she goes on about..looks simply are not everything to me.

Glocksman · Post by **Glocksman** » 2004-05-29 08:21am

Ummm...

I really hate to burst some bubbles about Ann Coulter, but over on the DU boards they call her "Mann" Coulter because there is speculation that she's a transexual.

The 'evidence' is what does appear to be a prominent adam's apple in some pictures.

Of course, it could have been photochopped.

This is all aside from the fact that she's a nutjob that'd make J. Edgar Hoover blush.

Caveat Emptor

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2004-05-29 12:49pm

Bob the Gunslinger wrote:That's the worst picture of E.D. Hill I've ever seen.

Agreed, E.D. Hill is a beautifull woman. Besides, that site doesn't have the hottest chick on Fox, Linda Vester. *drool*

Metrion Cascade · Post by **Metrion Cascade** » 2004-05-29 07:46pm

Glocksman wrote:Ummm...

I really hate to burst some bubbles about Ann Coulter, but over on the DU boards they call her "Mann" Coulter because there is speculation that she's a transexual.

The 'evidence' is what does appear to be a prominent adam's apple in some pictures.

Of course, it could have been photochopped.

This is all aside from the fact that she's a nutjob that'd make J. Edgar Hoover blush.

Caveat Emptor

It's not photoshopped. I've never seen it and I still know Coulter's got an Adam's apple from seeing her on TV. But I don't think she's trans. Just bony.

Hamel · Post by **Hamel** » 2004-05-29 08:29pm

Knife wrote:
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:That's the worst picture of E.D. Hill I've ever seen.
Agreed, E.D. Hill is a beautifull woman. Besides, that site doesn't have the hottest chick on Fox, Linda Vester. *drool*

Hiring sexy Linda Vester was the only good decision made by Fox.

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2004-05-29 09:41pm

Hamel wrote:Hiring sexy Linda Vester was the only good decision made by Fox.

It's a shame she comes across like a slight nutjob.

EmperorChrostas the Cruel · Post by **EmperorChrostas the Cruel** » 2004-05-29 09:46pm

Rhasps out in a thin quavery voice,
"You just wait, you young whippersnappers! You won't be young ferever ya' know!"
Ha! She old enough to be many of your mothers out there. She's held up quite well for a 43 year old woman. (As a 43 year old man who lives in the real world, I can tell you.) She's only 9 months younger than me!
Most of you don't live up to your own standards, and are far fatter and less athletic than my generation. (We just smoked and tanned too much, prematurely wrinkling us)
When you lived on post, and left it, 3 things jumped out and slapped you in the face, telling you you lived in a place that didn't represent a good cross section of the society you were protecting.
There are a LOT of women out here. (The first thing young horney soldiers notice)
There are a lot of FAT people here! (Running 2 plus miles per day takes care of that.)
There are a lot of OLD people here!(Only senior officers and first sergents are over 40)
Remember the words of Abraham Simpson, to his son Homer.
"I was "with it," alright, until they changed what "it" was. Now "it" just seems wierd and scary, and someday it will happen to YUOOOOOOO!
I think most of you find AnnCoulter unatractive because she is just too old for you.
Women in their 50's look doable to me. (Some) I bet they look scary to most of you.
They don't have any more wrinkles on their face than I do, though.(At least I got to keep all my hair,, even as if turns grey before my eyes.)

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2004-05-29 09:51pm

Nah, I'd be cool with banging Ann Coulter from the poke to the smoke... I'd just run like hell afterwards.

Melkor · Post by **Melkor** » 2004-05-30 12:19am

O'REILLY: I'll tell you. Here's what he thinks has gone wrong. Not enough troops on the ground, number one.

COULTER: Yeah, but that's not a problem. That's something that can cause a problem.

Whaaaaa???

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-05-31 05:13am

EmperorChrostas the Cruel wrote: I think most of you find AnnCoulter unatractive because she is just too old for you.

Amanda Tapping is at 39 years less than 5 years younger than Ann Coulter, and much more attractive.

In any case I wouldn't even touch a woman whose political views can best be described as "Pinochet on crack".

EmperorChrostas the Cruel · Post by **EmperorChrostas the Cruel** » 2004-05-31 12:59pm

Amanda Tapping is a MOVIE STAR, not a journalist. Four years is a loooooong time at that age bracket, as far as deterioration of looks goes. Coughmenopausecough.
Ugly movie stars don't happen, unless they are like Jack Elam, and play oddballs. You are compairing a woman five years younger, in a career that requires above average looks just to be a bit player, to a writer/political columnist, most of which have faces for radio.
Ann Margarette, and Barabara Eden are both older than Ann Coulter, and look better, so what's your point? (coughfaceliftcough)
Compaired to AVERAGE women, for her age, Ann Coulter is a hottie.
Just how old ARE you PT? Get back to me when your 40. I bet what you think is attractive has changed a bit by then, and you are a bit less picky.
When you are in your teens and twenties, just the number 40 something seems a cutoff point. 39? weeeell, she's still thirty something!
By the way, 39-43=4, not 5.

More to the point, you probably just don't like women with aquiline faces, that usualy come with noses that are larger/longer than what is considered more attractive, or more slender women. Thin ones end up looking bony if they don't work out, as age changes the skin elasticity.
http://www.anticoulter.com/mistert.html
"And you LIVE in that head?"

Just to show you what I think of her politicly.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-05-31 01:27pm

Okay, I'll admit that Coulter isn't that ugly.

At least she doesn't look like she's half human and half Grey Alien.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-05-31 01:28pm

(Waits for Spanky to show up with another "Peregrin, what is it with you and Greys?" comment)

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-05-31 01:37pm

More to the point, you probably just don't like women with aquiline faces, that usualy come with noses that are larger/longer than what is considered more attractive

Sounds like a very credible explanation.

(waits some more for a reaction to the Grey Alien comment)

LordShaithis · Post by **LordShaithis** » 2004-05-31 03:03pm

Yeah, you guys are pretty hard on her looks for a bunch of fat nerds on a sci-fi messageboard. She wouldn't let you guys bang her if you wanted to.

Anyway, the fact that she's apparently friends with Bill Maher makes me wonder if she's as nutty in real life as she is on television.

Hamel · Post by **Hamel** » 2004-05-31 03:24pm

GrandAdmiralPrawn wrote:Yeah, you guys are pretty hard on her looks for a bunch of fat nerds on a sci-fi messageboard. She wouldn't let you guys bang her if you wanted to.

I wouldn't bang her if she'd pay me to. Why you're talking shit in a thread like this, I have no idea.

Anyway, the fact that she's apparently friends with Bill Maher makes me wonder if she's as nutty in real life as she is on television.

She had an arab and/org moslem boyfriend at one time. Maybe she only trolls for attention in public.

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2004-05-31 03:27pm

Hamel wrote:She had an arab and/org moslem boyfriend at one time. Maybe she only trolls for attention in public.

Am I the only here who believes that Ms. Coulter doesn't really believe what she's saying, and might in fact be a spy placed by the Democrats to make their political opponents look stupid?

Stormbringer · Post by **Stormbringer** » 2004-05-31 04:27pm

If all this debate has left in it is: Do her or not, I do believe it's run it's course. So if there's nothing better to say, I'll go ahead and close it.

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2004-05-31 06:54pm

Stormbringer wrote:If all this debate has left in it is: Do her or not, I do believe it's run it's course. So if there's nothing better to say, I'll go ahead and close it.

That is the way of all conversations revolving around Ann Coulter. Everyone agrees that she's a complete far right nutball and then debate whether or not they'd do her or not. That is the way of things. You should probably close the thread.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-05-31 11:26pm

Does Ann Coulter actually have an ideological platform other than "the Bush Administration is always right?"

LordShaithis · Post by **LordShaithis** » 2004-05-31 11:32pm

No, no, no. Her platform is "The Bush administration is always wrong, because they don't go far enough! Nuke Mecca! Yeearrgh!"

As for her looks: By real-world standards, and for her age, she doesn't look bad. Picking on her for not being beat-off material seems a little childish.

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2004-05-31 11:33pm

Darth Wong wrote:Does Ann Coulter actually have an ideological platform other than "the Bush Administration is always right?"

She's bizarrely far right to the point that you wonder if she isn't Hitler Youth, actually further right than Bush is. However, she's got the belief that if you don't automatically agree with whatever the Bush administration has to say, you must be a traitor.

Some of her highlights are insisting that the Middle East should be invaded, converted to fundamentalist Christianity, and have their natural resources exploited, defending the book "The Bell Curve" (a book that "proves" that white folks are more intelligent than other races), and my favorite: all democrats and greens are legally guilty of treason (with all the punishments thereof).

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-05-31 11:40pm

And this individual is permitted to speak on national TV? She sounds like a hatemonger. That bullshit about the Bell Curve alone would probably get her in hot water up in Canada.

Illuminatus Primus · Post by **Illuminatus Primus** » 2004-06-01 12:08am

Darth Wong wrote:And this individual is permitted to speak on national TV? She sounds like a hatemonger. That bullshit about the Bell Curve alone would probably get her in hot water up in Canada.

My epistemology teacher tried to encourage kids to read The Bell Curve.

Ma Deuce · Post by **Ma Deuce** » 2004-06-01 12:31am

Peregrin Toker wrote: Am I the only here who believes that Ms. Coulter doesn't really believe what she's saying, and might in fact be a spy placed by the Democrats to make their political opponents look stupid?

The thought occurs to me, but it passes. After all, we've also got the likes of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Bill O'Reilly. By your logic, one could also argue that Michael Moore is really a Republican plant designed to make the Democrats look bad.

But I do think in a way Coulter is the Michael Moore of the Right: More than anything, she's in it for the dough. Despite Limbaugh's other obvious similarities to Moore, he does not stack up to him in this one regard as well as Coulter does.