Multinationals selectively applying the law shock.

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Plekhanov
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3991
Joined: 2004-04-01 11:09pm
Location: Mercia

Multinationals selectively applying the law shock.

Post by Plekhanov »

BBC
Music chiefs' anti social orders

A council is bringing Anti Social Behaviour Orders (ASBO) against top music bosses after it received over 1,000 complaints about fly posting.
If the illegal posters appear in the north London borough of Camden again the executives of Sony and BMG could be jailed for up to five years.

Fly posting has been defined as causing "harassment, alarm or distress" - the criteria required to gain an order.

Camden's move has been backed by the Keep Britain Tidy Campaign.

Its chief executive Alan Woods said: "BMG and Sony save themselves over £8m a year on advertising by fly posting illegally in Camden alone.

"While that boosts their already fat profits, it does however leave council taxpayers throughout the country with the bill to clean it up.

"That's something that record company chiefs cared little about before today but with the threat of a jail term hanging over their heads - maybe they'll think twice now."

The council estimates that dealing with illegal fly posting costs the Borough's taxpayers around £250,000 a year."

Dame Jane Roberts, leader of Camden Council, said: "Fly posting is a similar sort of behaviour to graffiti, in that it involves the illegal and non-approved use of property, degrading that property and making an area seem uncared for and an unpleasant place to be.

"Fly posting has a detrimental impact on the value of property and contributes to people's fear of crime and, as a result, to actual criminal behaviour, which is why we are seeking to outlaw it."

A spokesman for BMG said they would be contesting the ASBO and a spokesman for Sony Music UK said they had no comment to make.

The companies will attend a court hearing at Highbury Corner Magistrates' Court on 14 June to determine if the order is served on them.
I think this is a good example of creatively using the existing law to tackle problems without resorting to new legislation, for as long as I can remember fly posting often for major music acts has been endemic in cities in the UK, it maybe arguably be excusable for small companies who can’t afford legitimate advertising but multinationals have no justification. Unless it’s on a technicality I don’t really know how the music companies feel they can contest this, they do after all live by intellectual property law its only fair that they should obey the rest of the law as well.
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Sic 'em, Camden!

Five years? That's.....awesome. :D

But I'd hate to be some poor shmuck promoting his garage band and get slapped with that.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Plekhanov
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3991
Joined: 2004-04-01 11:09pm
Location: Mercia

Post by Plekhanov »

It would be harsh if “some poor shmuck promoting his garage band” got the full five years, I think you have to be a repeat offender though for this to happen so the small guy is relatively safe (unless he refuses to cease and desist of course).

Sony, BMG and the like on the other hand have been flagrantly ignoring the fly posting laws for years getting free advertising and inflicting cleanup bills upon councils and property owners all over Britain. Apparently if granted the orders will apply nationwide which should hopefully save councils a shit load of money and hopefully make the hypocritical music execs realise that the law works both ways.
Post Reply