Not reading a site is a very good way to get entirely mistaken impressions about what is written there. A quick pop over to factcheck finds the descriptions in this thread not entirely accurate...Tribun wrote:Not reading his site is also a way to prevent brain damage.
But who cares. Arroding to his latest news, he won't update the site anymore anyway.
Suffice it to say that - with regard to photon torpedos, I find it apt to quote Mike Wong here, who as owner of this site shouldn't have any problems with my referencing him:
Current fusion weapons actually produced and detonated range in size from “baby nukes” of 200-300 KT range to the 50 MT Soviet “small model” version of the Tsar Bomba (full version, which was never detonated in any test, was rated at a theoretical 100 MT). Discussions within the United States military weapons specialists has at times centered on the possibilities of producing 100-1000 MT fusion bombs. The first fusion bomb ever detonated, MIKE, was 11 megatons.Stardestroyer.net wrote:Photon torpedoes and quantum torpedoes both release energy equal to large nuclear fusion weapons.
A “large nuclear fusion bomb” may thus be understood to be in the range of tens of megatons; it is also understood, generally, that it is possible to fire with a smaller yield should the situation call for it.
Were I designing an antimatter warhead for a torpedo the size of a large coffin, with the industrial backing of a nation that produces large quantities of antimatter, I would probably use quite a bit more than that for maximum yield torpedos - common sense dictates that far more than a few ounces of functional warhead could be engineered into a package capable of carrying a dead body, after all.
With direct regard to the topic, there are several questions I have:
First, shuttle or runabout? What era and model? These vary wildly in size, shields, armament, speed, etc, and make for very important differences in the comparison.
Second, where is the evidence of TIE shields? I’m somewhat familiar with TIEs, and it was my impression that (a) all the regular TIEs (commonly designated fighters, bombers, or interceptors) blew up when hit in movies and (b) the various novels, games, etc indicate that TIE fighters, TIE bombers, and TIE interceptors are unshielded, although the advanced TIE (Vader’s personal craft, unique in the movies) and the TIE defender (not seen in any of the movies, but present in certain Star Wars “future” novels) are listed (at times) as having shields.
Third... shuttles and runabouts are engineered to completely different roles than TIE fighters. So on what bases are they to be compared? Simple combat utility? Cost efficiencies? Overall utility? Use training requirements?
EDIT: From Here