Basically, there are a lot of people living and working on university/college campuses or in the media who are able to influence a great deal of other people that there way is the only way, despite what they say about diversity or individual thought.
So, given that such environments are conducive to liberal thinking, and that such environments are abundantly prolific in America (hello numerous campuses and media outlets), how should this problem be addressed?
(Yes, this is a rewrite of what Uranium235 wrote. I usually avoid the News and Politics thread, but for some reason his post really struck me as elitist tripe.)
The American liberal support base
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
-
Deathstalker
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1523
- Joined: 2004-01-20 02:22am
-
MKSheppard
- Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
- Posts: 29842
- Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm
Re: The American liberal support base
Comrade, I agree very much with you, so I propose that we follow theDeathstalker wrote:So, given that such environments are conducive to liberal thinking, and that such environments are abundantly prolific in America (hello numerous campuses and media outlets), how should this problem be addressed?
practice of their idols and appoint political commisars to every
institution of higher learning and media outlet, to insure that only the
correct doctrine is promolugated.
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong
"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
Thread locked. This is pure bullshit and you damned well know it.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
If you really want to go down this track do it in the OTHER thread.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."