[1337n1nj4] T3h n1nj4 has flexed

J · Post by J » 2004-07-28 06:52pm

1337n1nj4 wrote:Chest 55"

So you're saying your chest is just 2" smaller than Arnold Schwarzenegger's at his peak? Why do I find that a little hard to believe?

Editor's note: Technically, this is a self ban.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-07-28 06:53pm

1337n1nj4 wrote:Height 5'9
Weight 220
Waist 34"
Chest 55"
Shoe Size is 9-9.5 US, depending

I call bullshit on that chest measurement. The World's Strongest Man competition winner in 2003 was a 310 pound behemoth named Mariusz Pudzianowski ( http://www.pudzian.pl ) and his chest measurement is 53.5"

1337n1nj4 · Post by **1337n1nj4** » 2004-07-28 06:54pm

It's not my chest per se...it's the flexed measurement around my chest and back.

I have a *really* large back.

aerius · Post by **aerius** » 2004-07-28 06:57pm

1337n1nj4 wrote:It's not my chest per se...it's the flexed measurement around my chest and back.

I have a *really* large back.

Are you sure you didn't mix up inches and centimeters?
Even flexed measurements of 55-56 inches are extremely rare.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-07-28 07:00pm

1337n1nj4 wrote:It's not my chest per se...it's the flexed measurement around my chest and back.

I have a *really* large back.

At 220 lbs? Don't make me laugh. Nobody at 220 lbs has a 55" chest measurement, flexed or not. 55" chests are like 22" arms; everyone says they have 'em, but they're actually exceedingly rare, and you won't find either on a 220 pounder.

1337n1nj4 · Post by **1337n1nj4** » 2004-07-28 07:00pm

Right, I forgot. I'm always wrong when you're involved.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-07-28 07:02pm

1337n1nj4 wrote:Right, I forgot. I'm always wrong when you're involved.

No, you're always a class A bullshitter. Bodybuilders are infamous for exaggerating their dimensions. Everybody's Schwarzenegger.

aerius · Post by **aerius** » 2004-07-28 07:02pm

Darth Wong wrote:At 220 lbs? Don't make me laugh. Nobody at 220 lbs has a 55" chest measurement, flexed or not. 55" chests are like 22" arms; everyone says they have 'em, but they're actually exceedingly rare, and you won't find either on a 220 pounder.

But you have to remember, he's an 1337n1nj4 so he also has a bigger dick than Peter North.

1337n1nj4 · Post by **1337n1nj4** » 2004-07-28 07:03pm

I'm not a bodybuilder.

Powerlifter. If I'm going to exaggerate anything, it's how much I lift.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-07-28 07:05pm

1337n1nj4 wrote:I'm not a bodybuilder.

Powerlifter. If I'm going to exaggerate anything, it's how much I lift.

Of course, and you have a bigger chest than the 310-lb hulk who won the World's Strongest Man twice in a row. Shouldn't you be competing in the Olympics?

1337n1nj4 · Post by **1337n1nj4** » 2004-07-28 07:07pm

There's a big difference between a relaxed chest measurement and the measurement I gave which is with both chest and back flexed.

Don't assume that physical dimension is going to directly correlate to performance, either.

aerius · Post by **aerius** » 2004-07-28 07:07pm

Darth Wong wrote:
1337n1nj4 wrote:I'm not a bodybuilder.
Powerlifter. If I'm going to exaggerate anything, it's how much I lift.
Of course, and you have a bigger chest than the 310-lb hulk who won the World's Strongest Man twice in a row. Shouldn't you be competing in the Olympics?

But he's an 1337n1nj4, so he has to be all stealthy and shit to avoid being seen on TV, because you know, that would just totally blow his secret ninja identity.

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2004-07-28 07:09pm

At 220 lbs? Don't make me laugh. Nobody at 220 lbs has a 55" chest measurement, flexed or not. 55" chests are like 22" arms; everyone says they have 'em, but they're actually exceedingly rare, and you won't find either on a 220 pounder.

Woah, hold on there Mr Wong did you even ask if he had a hump?

He could be like our friend here

I'm guessing Mr Quas here also is sporting a very large chest mesurment prehaps even as much as a 60'

1337n1nj4 · Post by **1337n1nj4** » 2004-07-28 07:19pm

Just for the record, my relaxed measurement is just under 48"

So everyone can STFU now

aerius · Post by **aerius** » 2004-07-28 07:23pm

1337n1nj4 wrote:Just for the record, my relaxed measurement is just under 48"

48" with a puffy down jacket on, yeah, I can believe that.

1337n1nj4 · Post by **1337n1nj4** » 2004-07-28 07:25pm

I'm sure my body is very concerned that you believe it.

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2004-07-28 07:28pm

Why don't you post photographic proof?

J · Post by J » 2004-07-28 07:28pm

55...48....do I hear a 44? 41? 39? do I have a 37?
Hey, anyone else wanna take bids on this?

1337n1nj4 · Post by **1337n1nj4** » 2004-07-28 07:31pm

You know, I might have bothered posting a shot a few posts back. But, considering the high asshole content of this thread, I think not.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2004-07-28 07:37pm

Oh, of course. Because, you know, providing proof to vindicate yourself from redicule is a much worse thing to do than to withhold it, making it seem like you don't have shit to back up your claim.

1337n1nj4 · Post by **1337n1nj4** » 2004-07-28 07:39pm

And I care what anyone here thinks because....?

EDIT: Even if I did provide a picture, it wouldn't mean anything. The only shots I have are about 15 lbs out of date, for one, and for two, there's no objective point of comparison. Ie, there's no way to gauge the measurement objectively based on the pics.

That, and I just don't give a damn if anybody believes it.

Howedar · Post by **Howedar** » 2004-07-28 07:43pm

Don't worry, we believe you.

Ass.

1337n1nj4 · Post by **1337n1nj4** » 2004-07-28 07:45pm

*shrug*

I don't work out to impress people on the Internet.

The thread asked for dimensions, I gave them.

Enigma · Post by **Enigma** » 2004-07-28 07:53pm

Since 1337n1nj4 doesn't want to back up his claims I guess I can make up mine

Height: 10'6" (5'8")
Weight: 4 ounces (250lb)
Chest: 30 feet (dunno)
Waist: 50 feet (dunno)
Foot: size googleplex (13)
Penis: one million bajillion quazillion kilometers

It's true and I don't have to back it up.

Hehe.

Figures in brackets are the real ones.

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2004-07-28 07:53pm

And I care what anyone here thinks because....?

Your a pathetic sad up loser who makes outlandoush claims because to "show off" to a bunch of people

I mean for bob-sake your posting to a web board, not only to posting to a Sci-Fi/Science/Tech/Anime/PORN(Let me just say go Porn)/And the Mockery of Stupid People board and you not only post your "measurements" you aurgue about it when people challenge you on it

EDIT: Even if I did provide a picture, it wouldn't mean anything. The only shots I have are about 15 lbs out of date, for one, and for two, there's no objective point of comparison. Ie, there's no way to gauge the measurement objectively based on the pics.

Bullshit a photo can tell alot

Between This

And someone who is simply increably fit

Such as Mr Lee here was only 39'

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

[1337n1nj4] T3h n1nj4 has flexed

[1337n1nj4] T3h n1nj4 has flexed

Re: The dimensions of sd.net? (Your measurements)