Need Shield and hull strength numbers
Moderator: Vympel
- Fleet Admiral Blair
- Youngling
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 2004-07-12 01:50am
- Location: Closer than you think
Need Shield and hull strength numbers
Can any one get me the SBD shield count and the RU hull strength of the following vessels:
Quasar Fire Bulk Cruiser
Eclipse Star Destroyer
TIE x1
and the TIE Defender
I've been around and I can't find the SBD or RU strength of these ships (among others)
Any one have them or know where I can find them?
Quasar Fire Bulk Cruiser
Eclipse Star Destroyer
TIE x1
and the TIE Defender
I've been around and I can't find the SBD or RU strength of these ships (among others)
Any one have them or know where I can find them?
Re: Need Shield and hull strength numbers
Don't existFleet Admiral Blair wrote:Can any one get me the SBD shield count and the RU hull strength of the following vessels:
Quasar Fire Bulk Cruiser
Eclipse Star Destroyer
No ideaTIE x1
and the TIE Defender
That would be because SBD and RU are not real valid units outside the game adn thus do not exist except for the vehciles in the game. Everything else will be in SI.I've been around and I can't find the SBD or RU strength of these ships (among others)
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
- Ghost Rider
- Spirit of Vengeance
- Posts: 27779
- Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
- Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars
With three vessels...never made into Game format.(Quasar Bulk Cruiser and ECD, as well as the X-1...only stats exist for the TIE Avenger)
For the TIE Defender
100 SBD
20 RU
For the TIE Defender
100 SBD
20 RU
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all
Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
- Fleet Admiral Blair
- Youngling
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 2004-07-12 01:50am
- Location: Closer than you think
SI = System International, aka the metric system.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
- Robert Treder
- has strong kung-fu.
- Posts: 3891
- Joined: 2002-07-03 02:38am
- Location: San Jose, CA
Sure. Shield strength is measured as the maximum amount of energy the shield is able to handle (through deflection/dispersion/whatever), and the figure is given in watts (in other words, how many joules of energy the shield system can handle per second). An example would be the Acclamator-class troopship, whose peak shielding is 7x10^22 watts (ref. ICS2). Several ships from Attack of the Clones have been given explicit shield statistics, and from these we can reasonably extrapolate the shield characteristics of similar vehicles. Lower limits for specific vessels and classes can also be obtained by examining particular incidents from the movies and the expanded universe. See here or here for a more in-depth look.Fleet Admiral Blair wrote:Is there another more official numbering system for SW hull and shield strengths? Other than 1D or 1D+2, which I think is from another game.
Hull strength would presumably be described in terms of the stress and buckling (etc.) resistance each hull has, but our lack of knowledge of Star Wars materials and construction sciences means that we can't say much about these specific values. We can, however, generate lower limits based on specific incidents, in the same manner as with the shields. I'm fairly certain no real units have officially been published regarding hull strengths, but we know they must generally be enormously strong simply by virtue of the great sizes of typical Star Wars vessels (see this essay for details).
I highly recommend that you give the following pages a look-through. They are standard reading for this board, and judging by your curiosity, you'll probably enjoy them quite a bit. Have fun! (plus, if you don't read them, you run the risk of finding out what RTFW! means)
from Mike Wong's page:
Star Wars and Star Trek technology overview
science primers for the uninitiated
assorted writings
specifics to Star Wars vs Star Trek, if the subject interests you
Curtis Saxton's page:
the one that started it all
Other notables:
Brian Young's Turbolaser Commentaries
Wayne Poe's SWvST FAQ
These can also all be found in one or more of the reference stickies at the top of this and other forums here.
And you may ask yourself, 'Where does that highway go to?'
Brotherhood of the Monkey - First Monkey|Justice League - Daredevil|Late Knights of Conan O'Brien - Eisenhower Mug Knight (13 Conan Pts.)|SD.Net Chroniclers|HAB
Brotherhood of the Monkey - First Monkey|Justice League - Daredevil|Late Knights of Conan O'Brien - Eisenhower Mug Knight (13 Conan Pts.)|SD.Net Chroniclers|HAB
- Fleet Admiral Blair
- Youngling
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 2004-07-12 01:50am
- Location: Closer than you think
The closest thing to a unit of comparison you can get for Star wars ship combat capabilities would be to take there volume and divide it by the number of weapons they have, with a anti-missile weapon = 10, light weapon = 4 (2 for a warhead launcher), 10 for a medium (5 for a launcher) and 20 for a heavy weapon (10 for a warhead).
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.
It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
- The Dark
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7378
- Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
- Location: Promoting ornithological awareness
Those are from the old West End Games Star Wars RPG (actually, their entire D6 system). There's also the new WotC RPG numbers, which are horribly low, as a blaster rifle is only 50% more powerful than a single round from an M-16. Basically, none of the game numbers work for a real-world conversion, and are only useful for comparisons of relative power.Fleet Admiral Blair wrote: Thanks
Is there another more official numbering system for SW hull and shield strengths? Other than 1D or 1D+2, which I think is from another game.
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
- Fleet Admiral Blair
- Youngling
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 2004-07-12 01:50am
- Location: Closer than you think
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
- Fleet Admiral Blair
- Youngling
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 2004-07-12 01:50am
- Location: Closer than you think
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
Except that that's not all useless because some of it actually means something. Outside of the gameplay, this MGLT, SBD, RU bullshit doesn't mean anything and is ignored by everyone.
I believe in a sign of Zeta.
[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]
"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
- Fleet Admiral Blair
- Youngling
- Posts: 73
- Joined: 2004-07-12 01:50am
- Location: Closer than you think
- Illuminatus Primus
- All Seeing Eye
- Posts: 15774
- Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
- Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
- Contact:
You don't get it, he means that outside of X-Wing Alliance, those figures mean zip.
The technical specs of the real ships in the movies and spin-off literature is only in bits and pieces. The most is available in the Ep 2 ICS.
The technical specs of the real ships in the movies and spin-off literature is only in bits and pieces. The most is available in the Ep 2 ICS.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.
The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |