Cthulhu-chan wrote:The important question is where does the mass come from afterward? I'm pretty sure my posts were clear on that. For that matter, I'm pretty confident that that was what Antares was referring to, as well.
Yeah, because assuming it can eat rocks, without any canon evidence to suggest that it could, makes a great deal of sense.
Let's ignore the fact that this means it goes from consuming organic materials to consuming rocks, in the same form. Now, one, when it kills Brett, what's it going to do with his corpse? It's pushed its fanged tongue through his skull. It can't host a new alien, cos he's friggin dead. Thus, the only logical reason to cart his corpse off is to provide sustanance at some point.
For future reference;
Alien novelisation, Alan Dean Foster, Page 138 (After the hugger's death) wrote:
I'm getting some mighty peculiar readings,
Alien novelisation, Alan Dean Foster, Page 158 wrote:
Nine
Coffee and tea had been joined on the mess table by individual servings of food. Everyone ate slowly, their enthusiasm coming from the fact they were a whole crew again rather than from the bland offerings of the autochef.
Only Kane ate differently, wolfind down huge portions of the artificial meats and vegetables. He'd alreads finished two normal helpings and was starting on a third with no sign of slowing down.
Those two fairly obviously show that the parasite within Kane was taking nutrients from him.
Alien novelisation, Alan Dean Foster, Page 199-200 wrote:
'Easy.' Dallas cradled his flamethrower, turned the corner into the corridor. Loud rending noises continued, more clearly now. He knew where they were originating. 'The food locker,' he whispered back to them, 'It's inside.'
'Listen to that,' Lambert muttered in awe. 'Jesus it must be big.'
'Big enough,' agreed Parker softly. 'I saw it remember. And strong. It carried Brett like ...' He cut off in mid-sentence, thoughts of Brett chocking off any desire for conversation.
[...]
Several minutes were spent nervously waiting outside for the locker's interior to cool enough for them to enter.
[...]
Packages of every size were strewn about the floor, opened in ways and by means their manufacturers had never envisioined.
Solid metal storage 'tins' (so called because of tradition and not their metallurgical make-up) had been peeled apart like fruit. From what they could see, the alien hadn't left much intact for the flamethrower to finish off.
Note that this locker is described as large enough for three people to walk into. This knocks it down to a matter of Occam's Razor. It does eat our foods. It might eat rocks and metals, or it might not, for which there is no evidence.
So we have 1 - with evidence, or 1
and 2 - unsubstantiated. Which sounds most rational?