That Aphrodite Contest-o-Rama!

Ace Pace · Post by **Ace Pace** » 2004-09-01 06:31am

Well, thats certainly a bit beyond the rules

Nice

Post by **Kuja** » 2004-09-01 11:31am

jmac wrote:http://members.rogers.com/eaphan/pix/jmac1.jpg

*turns to Aerius, grabs his arm, and shakes vigorously*

OK dude, you can't do this when taking a photgraph!

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2004-09-01 01:30pm

Hate to do this since that's a decent photo, Namarie, but that isn't really a headshot nor is the focus your face so it's not compliant with the rules. If possible, please submit another entry.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-09-01 01:54pm

Gil Hamilton wrote:Hate to do this since that's a decent photo, Namarie, but that isn't really a headshot nor is the focus your face so it's not compliant with the rules. If possible, please submit another entry.

That's a little harsh, isn't it? This picture is clear enough and large enough that if you really wanted to, you could just crop it to the top portion and have a good-quality headshot, and she's looking straight at the camera. She's actually showing more of her face than bohemianfey did, and you didn't DQ bohemianfey's entry. Perhaps you should just revise the OP to say "headshots only, rest of body not allowed."

Namarie · Post by **Namarie** » 2004-09-01 02:35pm

Alright, well new picture then

Byebye another picture

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2004-09-01 03:08pm

Darth Wong wrote:That's a little harsh, isn't it? This picture is clear enough and large enough that if you really wanted to, you could just crop it to the top portion and have a good-quality headshot, and she's looking straight at the camera. She's actually showing more of her face than bohemianfey did, and you didn't DQ bohemianfey's entry. Perhaps you should just revise the OP to say "headshots only, rest of body not allowed."

Bohemianfey's picture is still a face shot though, it's central focus is the face.

Look, guys, I'm just trying to be a good contest host here. The rules post before were agreed on ahead of time and not just by me, and I'd be pretty lousy if I didn't bother to at least try and make calls based on the agreed upon rules of the thread.

But since it appears to be the general concensus that rule number one is too strict, how about a revision of the first rule to.
"All entries must have the face of the contestant clearly visible and feature prominently within the photograph."

Is that better?

SPOOFE · Post by **SPOOFE** » 2004-09-01 04:16pm

Leopard print = good.

ArmorPierce · Post by **ArmorPierce** » 2004-09-01 08:20pm

Yes revise the rules as it is you are not allowed to post a picture that shows the body....

That said, anyone want to try to out do Namarie's risque pic?

Enigma · Post by **Enigma** » 2004-09-01 09:30pm

Darth Wong wrote:
Gil Hamilton wrote:Hate to do this since that's a decent photo, Namarie, but that isn't really a headshot nor is the focus your face so it's not compliant with the rules. If possible, please submit another entry.
That's a little harsh, isn't it? This picture is clear enough and large enough that if you really wanted to, you could just crop it to the top portion and have a good-quality headshot, and she's looking straight at the camera. She's actually showing more of her face than bohemianfey did, and you didn't DQ bohemianfey's entry. Perhaps you should just revise the OP to say "headshots only, rest of body not allowed."

(1) This is for headshots. Contestants may have as much or as little of the rest of their bodies as they want, but all contestants entries must have their faces clearly visible and be the central focus of the entry.

Namarie's risque pic fits the rules. Her face is present, clear and facing the camera and that is what counts. But rule number one also states that the contestant can have as much or as little of the rest of their bodies shown in the picture. Namarie excersized that option. Clearly she didn't break the rules.

But a clarification is indeed in order.

SPOOFE · Post by **SPOOFE** » 2004-09-02 03:57am

I think the rule should be:

"ANY PICTURE THAT SHOWS A GIRL WEARING PANTIES THAT HAVE 'HOT' WRITTEN ON THEM WILL BE PERMITTED, AND ENCOURAGED"

I motion that we allow the picture to stand on the floor, gentlemen. All in favor say "Aye!"

InnerBrat · Post by **InnerBrat** » 2004-09-02 04:31am

I'm removing the last picture and replacing it with:

I will try and get a made up one as well.

Post by **Kuja** » 2004-09-02 12:33pm

IB smiling! Yay!

Knife · Post by **Knife** » 2004-09-02 06:19pm

InnerBrat wrote:I'm removing the last picture and replacing it with:
[img]snippity[/img]

I will try and get a made up one as well.

Damn girl, ......

Post by **RogueIce** » 2004-09-02 08:26pm

Well, IB... I'm still torn between which is the better picture.

But your smile is very nice.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2004-09-02 08:49pm

Namarie wrote:http://www.ethersoft.net/ItsAmanda.JPG

one picture for now, maybe another later.

You knoe I've seen this picture before somewhere...

bohemianfey · Post by **bohemianfey** » 2004-09-02 10:37pm

...pretend this post was never here.

Mayabird · Post by **Mayabird** » 2004-09-02 11:15pm

As soon as I can find a friend with a working digital camera, I'll post a pic of me. It may be a couple days.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2004-09-03 12:09am

bohemian: oooohhh a red head.....

Maya: well an idea as to what our friend DP is getting himself into....

Mayabird · Post by **Mayabird** » 2004-09-03 01:18am

Here I am.

Post by **fgalkin** » 2004-09-03 01:25am

Hey, you actually look somewaht like your avatar!

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2004-09-03 02:11am

My thoughts too....

does this mean that DP looks like Mitsune Kanno from love hina?

Shroom Man 777 · Post by **Shroom Man 777** » 2004-09-03 07:22am

This thread is irrevocable proof that there is a god.

DPDarkPrimus · Post by **DPDarkPrimus** » 2004-09-03 10:10am

The Yosemite Bear wrote: does this mean that DP looks like Mitsune Kanno from love hina?

NO! *slap*

Ravenwing · Post by **Ravenwing** » 2004-09-03 10:18am

iv posted this bafore but since i dont have a camera at the moment and ill havter to get a hold of a disposable and my friends scanner this one will do for now...

Col. Crackpot · Post by **Col. Crackpot** » 2004-09-03 12:26pm

Namarie, if i wasn't married, I'd....um... well...

you get my vote