

Moderator: Edi
?D.Turtle wrote:
Necronlord: And they did that everytime they charged enemy troops...
Sixty five years ago, the most powerful code out there was the German Enigma Code which was pretty much considered uncrakable. Any modern TI-82 would make the Enigma code it's bitch in a short amount of time. Klingons are at least several hundred years more advanced. They would anally violate any modern code.phongn wrote:Don't ask me, I just know that brute-forcing a code with a large key size is a no-go.
That's a poor analogy. Enigma didn't have that many permutations and thus even a modern calculator could brute-force it given time. There were only 3.6 million possibilities, after all. (26^4 * 8) Secondly, there were weaknesses in the system - and not all are in the cypher!.Yogi wrote:Sixty five years ago, the most powerful code out there was the German Enigma Code which was pretty much considered uncrakable. Any modern TI-82 would make the Enigma code it's bitch in a short amount of time. Klingons are at least several hundred years more advanced. They would anally violate any modern code.phongn wrote:Don't ask me, I just know that brute-forcing a code with a large key size is a no-go.
No. Breaking Engima involved capturing code-books and miscellaneous other ways detailed here: http://web.usna.navy.mil/~wdj/enigma_machine.htmoberon wrote:Did Enigma require looking for primes?
No it isn't! Back then, brute forcing 3.5e6 combinations was also considered unthinkable! They didn't even have the freaking EINAC yet, just a bunch of people with penciles, pens, and possibly a few multiplying machines. Even when Britian seriously began invistigating code breaking, none of their computers would be able to stand up to a Gameboy! The FX Chip on the Starfox Supernintendo cartrage would pound the crap out of the EINAC. With that sort of computing technology, 3.5e6 = impossible.phongn wrote:That's a poor analogy. Enigma didn't have that many permutations and thus even a modern calculator could brute-force it given time. There were only 3.6 million possibilities, after all. (26^4 * 8) Secondly, there were weaknesses in the system - and not all are in the cypher!.
Comparing a system with only 3.5e6 possibilities with something like AES is simply idiotic.
Question #1: If you went back to 1942 and said "In the future, there will be a handheld device that can calculate 3.5e6 possibilities in a reasonable amount of time." would they call you a technology fanboy or not?phongn wrote:Real-time encoding pales in comparison to doing a keysearch of AES's entire space. Think for a moment rather than being a technology fanboy and saying "oh, they'll have enough power!"
It was stated that they didn't want it a bombarded ruin. The major cities only take up a VERY small percentage of total surface area. They don't have to set their disruptors to "atmoize" and vape everything. Besides, the military bases will EVENTUALLY have to be destroyed one way or another.D.Turtle wrote:Yogi: Please read the first post: They want Earth intact, not kill everyone and colonize it.
Instantly? I'm very sure it will take some time. Fortunatly, the Klingons have plenty of that, and plenty of things to do in the meantime.phongn wrote:Yes, they would. It doesn't change the fact that there's nothing projected at all, not even in the wildest fantasies of quantum computing scientists, that will allow you to instantly crack an encryption algorithm in such a fashion even centuries down the road.
Trichoiders are routinely used to hack systems, otherwise there would not be a "hack system" option on it. Since the Federation is used to dealing with more advanced races, it should have some resonable power in hacking alien counsles. As for hacking 20th century tech, the terminal involved was protecting important information, as well as being protected by whatever the guy could get from 29th century tech (he wasn't using it to its full potential, but it was more advanced than conventional technology). I seriously doubt the password was stored as plain text since freaking Windows NT has better protection than that, and I doubt he was using Windows NT (or anything worse).phongn wrote:You brought up the point that the Klingons could break any of our encryption systems. The only evidence that you offered was an attack on an alternate-timeline system, of which no evidence is available - other than that he used a password. For all the audience knows it could have been stored as plaintext on the hard drive and thus easy-pickings for the tricorder. As such, you've provided little evidence to support your argument.
Yeah, I know. All Klingons are warriors. You can go through the entire Empire and not findone doctor or engineer or stellar cartographer or philosipher or anyone who wasn't a muscle bound brute. Face it, it takes all kinds to run a functioning starship, and even College Fraternaties, more brute-like than anything science fiction writers can some up with, know the values of having one or two "smart people" around who know emough about Cryptography to crack a three hundred year old encryption code.phongn wrote:Furthermore, if we assume that the onboard computers are in the exaflop range (and I should remind you that Data is only in the teraflop range) they couldn't break the system in a reasonable amount of time with a basic brute force attack. You also assume that the crew has trained cryptologists capable of breaking codes, which I don't see on your average Klingon ship.
How much time? Years? Months? Weeks? No-one has infinate time.Yogi wrote:Instantly? I'm very sure it will take some time. Fortunatly, the Klingons have plenty of that, and plenty of things to do in the meantime.phongn wrote:Yes, they would. It doesn't change the fact that there's nothing projected at all, not even in the wildest fantasies of quantum computing scientists, that will allow you to instantly crack an encryption algorithm in such a fashion even centuries down the road.
You'd be suprised. First of all, even high-level people are notorious for using weak passwords (the tricorder could have done a dictionary attack, for one) and the machine may have also used weak encryption. The original EFS that shipped with Windows was notoriously insecure. You'reTrichoiders are routinely used to hack systems, otherwise there would not be a "hack system" option on it. Since the Federation is used to dealing with more advanced races, it should have some resonable power in hacking alien counsles. As for hacking 20th century tech, the terminal involved was protecting important information, as well as being protected by whatever the guy could get from 29th century tech (he wasn't using it to its full potential, but it was more advanced than conventional technology). I seriously doubt the password was stored as plain text since freaking Windows NT has better protection than that, and I doubt he was using Windows NT (or anything worse).phongn wrote:You brought up the point that the Klingons could break any of our encryption systems. The only evidence that you offered was an attack on an alternate-timeline system, of which no evidence is available - other than that he used a password. For all the audience knows it could have been stored as plaintext on the hard drive and thus easy-pickings for the tricorder. As such, you've provided little evidence to support your argument.
I never said that a ship was comprised of nothing but warriors. What I did note was that there were unlikely to be trained cryptologists onboard. Maybe not even enough to make a go at even an ancient cryptosystem (again, don't bring up Enigma - that thing had serious weaknesses that were uncovered rather quickly and the Germans ran under the assumption that it was unbreakable.)phongn wrote:Yeah, I know. All Klingons are warriors. You can go through the entire Empire and not findone doctor or engineer or stellar cartographer or philosipher or anyone who wasn't a muscle bound brute. Face it, it takes all kinds to run a functioning starship, and even College Fraternaties, more brute-like than anything science fiction writers can some up with, know the values of having one or two "smart people" around who know emough about Cryptography to crack a three hundred year old encryption code.Furthermore, if we assume that the onboard computers are in the exaflop range (and I should remind you that Data is only in the teraflop range) they couldn't break the system in a reasonable amount of time with a basic brute force attack. You also assume that the crew has trained cryptologists capable of breaking codes, which I don't see on your average Klingon ship.
I know, I wrote that bec I feel as you do, that bringing up Enigma is a poor analogy. It's handy how mathematicians and CSticians can somehow figure out thinking times, ennit?phongn wrote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by oberon:
Did Enigma require looking for primes?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. Breaking Engima involved capturing code-books and miscellaneous other ways detailed here: http://web.usna.navy.mil/~wdj/enigma_machine.htm
No they won't, they be busy getting their asses kicked.Yogi wrote: Instantly? I'm very sure it will take some time. Fortunatly, the Klingons have plenty of that...
Getting their asses kicked?
... and plenty of things to do in the meantime...
I just wanted to point out another great thing about modern humans--our warships will all have crypto people on board... The contrast exists, unless you would change your mind about the Klingons. I think it's just as likely that they would have cryptologists and crypto techs aboard any of their ships--after all, it's just a job. I find it credible that a ship that takes such brainpower-all ships do, like modern ships are not just a bunch of drooling swab jockeys and gun nuts floating around out there-a ship like that, especially when going into unknown territory, especially going to war, could easily have a codebreaking staff.phongn wrote: What I did note was that there were unlikely to be trained cryptologists onboard.
Uh, if you're calling me a CS guy, I'm not. I'm a bio majoroberon wrote:I know, I wrote that bec I feel as you do, that bringing up Enigma is a poor analogy. It's handy how mathematicians and CSticians can somehow figure out thinking times, ennit?No. Breaking Engima involved capturing code-books and miscellaneous other ways detailed here: http://web.usna.navy.mil/~wdj/enigma_machine.htm
Conceded.I just wanted to point out another great thing about modern humans--our warships will all have crypto people on board... The contrast exists, unless you would change your mind about the Klingons. I think it's just as likely that they would have cryptologists and crypto techs aboard any of their ships--after all, it's just a job. I find it credible that a ship that takes such brainpower-all ships do, like modern ships are not just a bunch of drooling swab jockeys and gun nuts floating around out there-a ship like that, especially when going into unknown territory, especially going to war, could easily have a codebreaking staff.