Enforcing the Prime Directive
Moderator: Vympel
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1313
- Joined: 2003-08-06 05:44am
- Location: Whangaparoa, one babe, same sun and surf.
Enforcing the Prime Directive
How do the Feddies do it? How do they keep pre-warp societies safe from Merchants with low/non-existant ethics? Does each planet have a destroyer on picket duty with sensor platforms keeping watch? How are they kept safe from the Harry Mudd's of the Quadrant?
Brought on by the 'First contact' questions in SLAM. Obviously the Feds have an official policy for when they find a pre-warp society, but how do they enforce it?
Brought on by the 'First contact' questions in SLAM. Obviously the Feds have an official policy for when they find a pre-warp society, but how do they enforce it?
Don't abandon democracy folks, or an alien star-god may replace your ruler. - NecronLord
IIRC Insurrection shows us that starsystems inside their 'territory' (a useless term for space, but anyway...) is a part of the Federation even though the inhabitants are not Federation citizens. Therefore they can simply quarantine the world off from other rival powers, such as the Ferengi or Klingons etc, by claiming territorial sovereignty. This keeps those guys out.
As for internal Federation worlds? I should think Starfleet and the Federation Council would probably obey the PD if it suits them. Then again, if the system has something valuable then the PD gets thrown out the window.
As for internal Federation worlds? I should think Starfleet and the Federation Council would probably obey the PD if it suits them. Then again, if the system has something valuable then the PD gets thrown out the window.
The Prime Directive only applies to Federation citizens. However anyone under Prime Directive protection within Federation space is apparently shielded from outsiders as well.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Actually, the Prime Directive applies only to Federation members and Starfleet, other civilizations are free to plunder and subjugate pre-warp socities to their hearts content. The Feringi are notorious for it as are the Cardassians. The caveate being that if you engage in such behavior the Feddies are likely to forbid you from trading within Fedddie space , thus cutting you off from the largest of all markets within the Alpha Quadrant.
I would imagine that Pre-warp civ's found within the boundaries of Federation controlled space are picketted or have stealthed sensor probes in place to monitor the world and report back to FleetHQ once they detect the prerequisite warp technology so that a First Contact team can be dispatched to induce this nascent world to join up with the Federation.
I would imagine that Pre-warp civ's found within the boundaries of Federation controlled space are picketted or have stealthed sensor probes in place to monitor the world and report back to FleetHQ once they detect the prerequisite warp technology so that a First Contact team can be dispatched to induce this nascent world to join up with the Federation.
BotM
- Sarevok
- The Fearless One
- Posts: 10681
- Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
- Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense
Although the prime directive is a Federation creation they dont like others violating it. In the Voyeger episode False Profit two Ferengi crash landed on a primitive world and took over the place with their superior technology. The Voyeger crew did their best to evict them even though it was none of their buisness. IIRC they cited the Ferengi as having violated the prime directive.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
- Patrick Degan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 14847
- Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
- Location: Orleanian in exile
Everything except simply sticking them in the brig. And then that silly bitch Janeway actually lets herself be talked into releasing them back to the planet on the grounds that to remove them would violate the Prime Directive by taking away the natives' "gods".IUnknown wrote:Although the prime directive is a Federation creation they dont like others violating it. In the Voyeger episode False Profit two Ferengi crash landed on a primitive world and took over the place with their superior technology. The Voyeger crew did their best to evict them even though it was none of their buisness. IIRC they cited the Ferengi as having violated the prime directive.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
It seems like enforcing the Prime Directive would be a huge drain on Starfleet. I imagine most of the worlds within the Federation are not warp-capable, so they have to defend all those worlds with only the resources of the worlds that are warp-capable. They would have to keep everyone, including civilians, off them. In times of war, the drain becomes worse, because these worlds make excellent bases and resource pumps for the enemy, who doesn't follow the Prime Directive, right when they need ships elewhere. Under these circumstances, I imagine one of three scenarios is happening.
1. They ignore the Prime Directive, which makes them hypocrites.
2. They follow the Prime Directive, and are at a big disadvantage compared to their enemies.
3. They follow the Prime Directive, and manage to find enough resources on the planets they are allowed to exploit to overcome having to defend the planets they aren't allowed to exploit.
I see little evidence of the second scenario being true, and the third is too convenient to be believed. This leaves the first scenario. In other words, either the Prime Directive is less clear-cut than it's cracked up to be, or it's not being followed as scrupulously as we are led to believe.
1. They ignore the Prime Directive, which makes them hypocrites.
2. They follow the Prime Directive, and are at a big disadvantage compared to their enemies.
3. They follow the Prime Directive, and manage to find enough resources on the planets they are allowed to exploit to overcome having to defend the planets they aren't allowed to exploit.
I see little evidence of the second scenario being true, and the third is too convenient to be believed. This leaves the first scenario. In other words, either the Prime Directive is less clear-cut than it's cracked up to be, or it's not being followed as scrupulously as we are led to believe.
For the glory of Gondor, I sack this here concession stand!
- Sir Sirius
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 2975
- Joined: 2002-12-09 12:15pm
- Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination
What exactly are you basing that on?CDiehl wrote:It seems like enforcing the Prime Directive would be a huge drain on Starfleet. I imagine most of the worlds within the Federation are not warp-capable, so they have to defend all those worlds with only the resources of the worlds that are warp-capable.<snip>
That actually makes no sense whatsoever. How is the Federation going to put their laws on other powers like the Klingons, Romulans or Ferengi? Something was wrong there. I can only say it must have been bad writing.Although the prime directive is a Federation creation they dont like others violating it. In the Voyeger episode False Profit two Ferengi crash landed on a primitive world and took over the place with their superior technology. The Voyeger crew did their best to evict them even though it was none of their buisness. IIRC they cited the Ferengi as having violated the prime directive.
- TheDarkling
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 4768
- Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am
Janeway came up with the rather dubious justification that since the Federation hosted the negations which lead to the Ferengi getting stranded in the DQ (and thus on that planet) they were duty bound to correct the situation.Superman wrote: That actually makes no sense whatsoever. How is the Federation going to put their laws on other powers like the Klingons, Romulans or Ferengi? Something was wrong there. I can only say it must have been bad writing.
In essence she didn’t like what the Ferengi were doing (with good reason) and just decided to correct the situation, I can’t really say I disapprove.
I'm basing it on the observation that many episodes of Star Trek involved cultures that had no obvious warp technology available. I think one can safely assume the same state of affairs exists all over the galaxy, with warp-capable cultures being rare. As a result, there would have to be a lot of inhabited planets inside Federation borders that are pre-warp, and off limits according to the Prime Directive. Such planets would have to be guarded by Starfleet, to make sure they can develop at their own pace without interference from anyone.
As for civilians not being bound by the Prime Directive, I doubt it. I'm sure most Federation citizens are not inclined to break it any more than they would be to break any major law or taboo. However all it takes is one greedy reprobate with a ship and some trinkets to wreck everything. I don't think a Starfleet captain or a Federation court is going to accept some smart-ass excusing having just been caught providing advanced technology to a pre-warp culture by saying the Prime Directive doesn't apply to him. For the Prime Directive to mean anything, it would have to apply to everyone in the Federation. Otherwise, it's nothing but empty idealism.
As for civilians not being bound by the Prime Directive, I doubt it. I'm sure most Federation citizens are not inclined to break it any more than they would be to break any major law or taboo. However all it takes is one greedy reprobate with a ship and some trinkets to wreck everything. I don't think a Starfleet captain or a Federation court is going to accept some smart-ass excusing having just been caught providing advanced technology to a pre-warp culture by saying the Prime Directive doesn't apply to him. For the Prime Directive to mean anything, it would have to apply to everyone in the Federation. Otherwise, it's nothing but empty idealism.
For the glory of Gondor, I sack this here concession stand!
- Patrick Degan
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 14847
- Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
- Location: Orleanian in exile
In TOS, the Federation would make contact with and even negotiate trade or safe harbour treaties with pre-warp civilisations when necessary ("A Taste Of Armageddon", "Friday's Child", "The Mark Of Gideon", "Wolf In The Fold") and in one instance provided covert arms and aid to balance out a tribal war where one side was being equipped covertly by the Klingons ("A Private Little War"). Starfleet was obliged to correct interference wrought by previous Earth expeditions upon primitive cultures ("A Piece Of The Action") as well as by Starfleet personnel or private individuals knowingly breaking the law; said individuals being held liable as much as Starfleet officers who violated Gen. Order n.1, e.g. John Gill, R.M. Merrick, and Capt. Ronald Tracy of the Exeter ("Patterns Of Force", "Bread And Circuses", "The Omega Glory"). It also seems that the Federation would deal with or even admit into Federation membership worlds which didn't have warp flight but did possess other advanced technologies and were aware of space civilisation ("A Taste Of Armageddon", "The Cloud-Minders", "The Mark Of Gideon").
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
—Abraham Lincoln
People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House
Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
- Admiral_Handsome
- Redshirt
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2004-08-22 04:52pm
Alyeska wrote:
Take Mintaka for example. The prime directive was enforced on the planet (before the mess up) even though the Mintakans had no knowledge of the Federation and therefore did not consider themselves to be Federation citizens. Which would mean the prime directive wouldn't apply to them.
Are you sure? That seems rather odd since all the pre-warp civilisations do not know the Federation even exists. How can they be citizens of something they know nothing about?The Prime Directive only applies to Federation citizens...
Take Mintaka for example. The prime directive was enforced on the planet (before the mess up) even though the Mintakans had no knowledge of the Federation and therefore did not consider themselves to be Federation citizens. Which would mean the prime directive wouldn't apply to them.
I would say the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively engaged in hostile acts against the Federation or that have not yet communicated and opened relations with the Federation. The Tamarians are a good example I think. Since communication was impossible, the Federation did not interfere with them. Once communication has been made, the prime directive is out of the window and trade as well as political discussion is open.Actually, the Prime Directive applies only to Federation members and Starfleet
Your not paying attention. The restrictions of the Prime Directive only apply to Federation citizens. This means that only Federation citizens must abide by the Non Interferance rule. Now when a pre-warp civilization is within Federation space the Federation basicaly claim it under Prime Directive protection and prevent other governments and people from interferring.Admiral_Handsome wrote:Are you sure? That seems rather odd since all the pre-warp civilisations do not know the Federation even exists. How can they be citizens of something they know nothing about?
Take Mintaka for example. The prime directive was enforced on the planet (before the mess up) even though the Mintakans had no knowledge of the Federation and therefore did not consider themselves to be Federation citizens. Which would mean the prime directive wouldn't apply to them.
Incorrect. The Federation would have to fight wars with just about everyone if they attempted to enforce the Prime Directive. What other soverign governments do in or near their borders is something the Federation can not change unless they are willing to go to war over it. Hence only the Federation and planets within the Federation fall under the Prime Directive.I would say the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively engaged in hostile acts against the Federation or that have not yet communicated and opened relations with the Federation. The Tamarians are a good example I think. Since communication was impossible, the Federation did not interfere with them. Once communication has been made, the prime directive is out of the window and trade as well as political discussion is open.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
- Admiral_Handsome
- Redshirt
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2004-08-22 04:52pm
Alyeska wrote:
Which part of my post did you not get? I wrote this:
"I would say the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively engaged in hostile acts against the Federation or that have not yet communicated and opened relations with the Federation"
So where did you get this rubbish that I somehow implied the Federation wants to enforce the prime directive on races which have soverign governments, by the use of arms?
Read again. "I would say the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively engaged in hostile acts against the Federation or that have not yet communicated and opened relations with the Federation."
Let me clear that up, just in case you are not paying attention again.
If a previously unknown race such as the husnok came out of deep space and attacked the Feds without ever communicating then the prime directive ie the non interference in other species affairs part, would be out the nearest airlock.
Also, if communication cannot be made with a race, the Federation WILL NOT interfere with that race. The Tamarians are your example of this.
There you go miss Alyeska, now do pay attention in the future.
Now it is YOU who is not paying attention miss Alyeska.Incorrect. The Federation would have to fight wars with just about everyone if they attempted to enforce the Prime Directive. What other soverign governments do in or near their borders is something the Federation can not change unless they are willing to go to war over it. Hence only the Federation and planets within the Federation fall under the Prime Directive.
Which part of my post did you not get? I wrote this:
"I would say the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively engaged in hostile acts against the Federation or that have not yet communicated and opened relations with the Federation"
So where did you get this rubbish that I somehow implied the Federation wants to enforce the prime directive on races which have soverign governments, by the use of arms?
Read again. "I would say the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively engaged in hostile acts against the Federation or that have not yet communicated and opened relations with the Federation."
Let me clear that up, just in case you are not paying attention again.
If a previously unknown race such as the husnok came out of deep space and attacked the Feds without ever communicating then the prime directive ie the non interference in other species affairs part, would be out the nearest airlock.
Also, if communication cannot be made with a race, the Federation WILL NOT interfere with that race. The Tamarians are your example of this.
There you go miss Alyeska, now do pay attention in the future.
Grow a fucking brain. The Prime Directive is a Federation law. Why would the rest of the galaxy give a rats ass about that?
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
- General Zod
- Never Shuts Up
- Posts: 29211
- Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
- Location: The Clearance Rack
- Contact:
that logic doesn't work unless you only apply it to planets within federation territory. outside of federation territory Starfleet doesn't have the authority to enforce jack shit.Admiral_Handsome wrote: Now it is YOU who is not paying attention miss Alyeska.
Which part of my post did you not get? I wrote this:
"I would say the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively engaged in hostile acts against the Federation or that have not yet communicated and opened relations with the Federation"
So where did you get this rubbish that I somehow implied the Federation wants to enforce the prime directive on races which have soverign governments, by the use of arms?
Read again. "I would say the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively engaged in hostile acts against the Federation or that have not yet communicated and opened relations with the Federation."
using your reasoning, the federation would enforce the prime directive in say, Romulan Space, during eras when the Romulans weren't engaged in hostilities with the federation. which it couldn't do without risking war with the Romulans since it has no business being in their territory in the first place.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
- Admiral_Handsome
- Redshirt
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2004-08-22 04:52pm
Let me first say this, Miss Alyeska please SHUT UP (grow a brain? What the hell is that meant to mean? How can I be typing if I have no brain? Yet again your reasoning awsome )
Back to the discussion...
Darth Zod Wrote:
Take my earlier statement: "... the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively ..."
I meant this in terms of Federation policy towards other races. If the prime directive applies to a race (ie the Tamarians) then what I mean is that the Federation will not interfere with that race, and will uphold the prime directive when dealing with that race. therefore the PD applies to that race. Just a simple reading misunderstanding, but I can see how my comments could be read in that way. Hope that clears it Zod
Back to the discussion...
Darth Zod Wrote:
I'm not sure we are on the same wavelength here. Let me make myself a little more clear so we can see where we stand. I'm not implying that any other race should obey the prime directive. You should read my comments in the context of how the Federation itself obeys the PD. Let me show you what I mean.that logic doesn't work unless you only apply it to planets within federation territory. outside of federation territory Starfleet doesn't have the authority to enforce jack shit.
using your reasoning, the federation would enforce the prime directive in say, Romulan Space, during eras when the Romulans weren't engaged in hostilities with the federation. which it couldn't do without risking war with the Romulans since it has no business being in their territory in the first place.
Take my earlier statement: "... the prime directive applies to ALL races that are not actively ..."
I meant this in terms of Federation policy towards other races. If the prime directive applies to a race (ie the Tamarians) then what I mean is that the Federation will not interfere with that race, and will uphold the prime directive when dealing with that race. therefore the PD applies to that race. Just a simple reading misunderstanding, but I can see how my comments could be read in that way. Hope that clears it Zod
I'm a guy dipshit.
Furthermore you got into an argument with me without ever reading everything in this thread. Prime Directive applies to non-warp civilizations that do not have previous contact with warp civilizations. The Prime Directive does not apply to warp capable civilizations. This means the Federation will do as it pleases with warp capable or warp visited civilizations.
Everything you have posted has already been covered, although you did a magnificent job of NOT speaking clearly and deciding to get into an argument over things already decided.
Furthermore you got into an argument with me without ever reading everything in this thread. Prime Directive applies to non-warp civilizations that do not have previous contact with warp civilizations. The Prime Directive does not apply to warp capable civilizations. This means the Federation will do as it pleases with warp capable or warp visited civilizations.
Everything you have posted has already been covered, although you did a magnificent job of NOT speaking clearly and deciding to get into an argument over things already decided.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
FYI Grow a Brain means that you are acting like and idiot and that you need to change your ways. The insult works in that it assumes you don't have one and that in order to change your ways you must grow one. Deductive reasoning isn't strong with you is it?
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Answering a distress call is not part of the Prime Directive. Infact Data has gotten in trouble for answering a distress call when it violated the Prime Directive.Praxis wrote:One question:
What if two aspects of the Prime Directive contradict? (perhaps I'm wrong and this thing is part of Starfleet's directive, not the prime directive, but anyway:)
For example:
1) Always answer a distress call
2) Don't interfere with developing societies
?
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
- Admiral_Handsome
- Redshirt
- Posts: 26
- Joined: 2004-08-22 04:52pm
A Lady Wrote:
Praxis Wrote:
??? Then why do you have such a sissy girls name? What does it mean?I'm a guy dipshit
Then why was Janeway so careful about not giving tech to the warp civilisations she ran across during the voyage home?The Prime Directive does not apply to warp capable civilizations
You mean like the Tamarians? No contact was possible so they didn't interfere with them for decades, they completely avoided them until picard bridged the two for future talks, and only because THEY were the ones who made the 'first contact'.This means the Federation will do as it pleases with warp capable or warp visited civilizations
Am I the one at fault? You read my earlier post and then 'click' you finally understood and saw how pathetic your earlier posts had been.although you did a magnificent job of NOT speaking clearly
Or what? Why do I need to change? And what is it exactly that I need to change?you need to change your ways
Praxis Wrote:
If a planet just like modern day Earth, with 6 billion people was in danger, (lets say a meteorite is about to hit it) then the Federation would not lift a finger to help the inhabitants on that planet for the simple reason that they are not technologicaly advanced enough. The Federation would rather watch 6 billion people die than help a civilisation that is not as technologicaly advanced as they. How on Earth they can call themselves civilised is beyond me. My guess is that if something as bad as my above example actually happened, then the Federation leaders would be overthrown by the more compassionate general public.One question:
What if two aspects of the Prime Directive contradict? (perhaps I'm wrong and this thing is part of Starfleet's directive, not the prime directive, but anyway:)
For example:
1) Always answer a distress call
2) Don't interfere with developing societies