The Show Trial of Admiral Handsome

Frank Hipper · Post by **Frank Hipper** » 2004-09-14 06:59pm

What? A show trial without my services being requested? Blasphemy!

Oh, and, ban it sez I.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2004-09-14 07:01pm

Frank Hipper wrote:What? A show trial without my services being requested? Blasphemy!

Oh, and, ban it sez I.

You're the Commandant of the People's Museum. Why would you need to be in on a show trial?

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2004-09-14 07:04pm

*Sound of gavel*

"To those of you who posted No, or Abstain, report to Commandant
Hipper for re-education at the People's Museum."

*pause*

"What, you mean we can't do this either? Bollocks."

Frank Hipper · Post by **Frank Hipper** » 2004-09-14 07:09pm

Rogue 9 wrote:
Frank Hipper wrote:What? A show trial without my services being requested? Blasphemy!

Oh, and, ban it sez I.
You're the Commandant of the People's Museum. Why would you need to be in on a show trial?

Ignorant of HAB history much?

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2004-09-14 07:13pm

I told the little fuck that I'm a guy and THEN he calls my name a sissy name and makes a direct point of calling me a girl in his sig. He damned well has been warned about his behavior and should know better.

The Kernel · Post by **The Kernel** » 2004-09-14 07:21pm

This guy distinctly reeks of Colonel Maybourne, is it possible they are one and the same?

In any case, ban the motherfucker. He's just trying to stir up the pot and he's not even doing it in a particularly interesting way that might make him an amusing chewtoy for a few weeks at least. I'm with Red, let's ban now and avoid the rush.

Admiral_Handsome · Post by **Admiral_Handsome** » 2004-09-14 07:32pm

I am Admiral_Handsome. I have come to put down the lies which have been spoken of me. (worf before the klingon high council

)

I have not yet read all this topic, but have quickly posted this because some of you think I turned tale and ran during the adultery debate. I did not. Let me say that I have spent the last few hours with some of the old lads (in the real world that is) and that is why I did not respond, YET. I intend too, that you can be certain of. I love the 'can't tell the difference between civil/criminal offence' stuff though. Especially since we are talking about adultery becoming a CRIMINAL offence in turkey, not civil offence

. But that is another topic, and I will post tomorrow since it is late here right now.

Hold the sentence until I have defended myself.

Oh and by the way, I didn't know quoting some one was an offense, especially since so many others do it. If anyone has a problem with my sig, then speak to me about it. Then I will speak to you about YOUR errors.

that is all for tonight. i'm not quite sure why I am having to defend myself, but no matter. I will show you that I do not deserve getting banned for pretty much saying opinion (yes it differs but thats not a crime)
Especially since there were racist mofos who went over 100 posts before being banned (those fitness guys in 2002).

As a sign of respect, and to show that I am open to discussion I will remove the disputed sig until further notice. It will then be debated and cleared for its return if the parties present can convince me it is wrong.

I will quickly read the accusations on this topic before I sleep.

Yaaaawn! Good night, or should I say have a good day

.

Admiral_Handsome · Post by **Admiral_Handsome** » 2004-09-14 07:33pm

oh and one more thing. Thanks to the gent who mailed me the link to this thread.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-09-14 07:40pm

MKSheppard wrote:
Durandal wrote:Ban his ass.
"Please note that 4 votes were entered on behalf of the Durandal Computer system."

*More whispering into the Judge's ear*

"What, you mean that here, people only vote once? An affront to HAB standards, this is!"

You're forgetting that I vote Democrat. Me and my dead relatives.

The Aliens · Post by **The Aliens** » 2004-09-14 07:41pm

When you snipe out of a signature, as opposed to calling some of the most senior members on what they've said, you deserve to be banned. he obviously hasn't read the TOS, and if you fail to do that you're not worthy of being a member of the board. Ban him.

Admiral_Handsome · Post by **Admiral_Handsome** » 2004-09-14 07:42pm

final post for today (yes another excuse right? I mean, its not like I have to sleep is it?)

Has he been warned about his behavior and signature?

I believe so. It's had about as much effect as waving a gun at a hurricane...

Yes, I have been warned. I have just read the warnings and acted appropriately. So far the case seems thin. I'm really not certain what the crime is. I WILL post tomorrow so this 'cowardly' labell is just wrong.

Do I seem arrogant? Sarcastic? What is it? Leave a large list so by the time I wake, I will have your opinions on which I can make my post.

Cheers!

The Aliens · Post by **The Aliens** » 2004-09-14 07:46pm

Admiral_Handsome wrote:Yes, I have been warned. I have just read the warnings and acted appropriately. So far the case seems thin. I'm really not certain what the crime is. I WILL post tomorrow so this 'cowardly' labell is just wrong.

Do I seem arrogant? Sarcastic? What is it? Leave a large list so by the time I wake, I will have your opinions on which I can make my post.

Cheers!

Your first warning was the TOS. You agreed to them by making your first post here, and you are bound by them. If you do something against the TOS, expect to be called on it. As opposed to what would happen for a more productive member of the board- a warning- you've produced nothing of any discerable value thus far. Therefore, we're going to terminate you so we don't have another useless account cluttering up the boards. Either contribute something, fast, or get bent.

Grand Moff Yenchin · Post by **Grand Moff Yenchin** » 2004-09-14 09:54pm

On the first page of this thread, I decided to vote BAN, after the second page, I knew I was right.

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2004-09-14 09:59pm

What, a showtrial against not against a MECHA supporter? Strange times.

And Ban his ass.

Vertigo1 · Post by **Vertigo1** » 2004-09-14 10:20pm

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-09-14 10:28pm

Here's a question: what has Admiral_Hatfucker contributed to the board? Does anybody like him? No. Is he entertaining? No. Does he say anything intelligent? No. Does he contribute any unusual skills, pictures, information? No. Does he demonstrate a useful background? No.

So given the fact that he seems to be here for the sole purpose of acting like a jack-ass, why SHOULDN'T we ban him?

Admiral_Hatfucker wrote:I love the 'can't tell the difference between civil/criminal offence' stuff though. Especially since we are talking about adultery becoming a CRIMINAL offence in turkey, not civil offence.

Obviously, you are too fucking stupid to realize that this desperate attempt to cover up your original mistake will not paper over your hilariously stupid claim that a person could be charged in criminal court for leaving work 5 minutes early. Nor does it work anyway, since you can't justify Turkey's decision to make it a criminal act by simply citing Turkey's decision to make it a criminal act; we call that circular logic at best, and fucking stupidity at worst.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2004-09-14 10:29pm

The Kernel wrote:This guy distinctly reeks of Colonel Maybourne, is it possible they are one and the same?

IP check is negative. He's not a sock puppet. Just another generic doofus.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-09-14 10:30pm

RedImperator wrote:
The Kernel wrote:This guy distinctly reeks of Colonel Maybourne, is it possible they are one and the same?
IP check is negative. He's not a sock puppet. Just another generic doofus.

Unfortunately, stupidity is far too common in this world, as anyone can verify by monitoring the behaviour of drivers on the road.

muse · Post by **muse** » 2004-09-14 10:33pm

Ooooo, my first show trial!
This is so fun, let's see....yeah I think a ban sounds good.

Lonestar · Post by **Lonestar** » 2004-09-14 10:42pm

I'll give him the benefit of the doubt.

Mark S · Post by **Mark S** » 2004-09-14 10:59pm

From what I watched in the PST thread, the guys a moron and an unrepentant douche bag.

Morilore · Post by **Morilore** » 2004-09-14 11:09pm

His trolldom is just... boring.

I originally abstained, but I'm thinking ban now.

J · Post by J » 2004-09-14 11:42pm

"Throw him to the tigers!"

"sorry, we don't have tigers, only lions"

"Fine, throw him to the lions then!"

"but that violates at least 10 international laws.."

"what about bears?"

"as far as I know there are.."

"Bears it is! Throw him to the bears!"

Robert Walper · Post by **Robert Walper** » 2004-09-14 11:47pm

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote:Think he even knows that this is here?
I'd say no.

I'll PN him and fix that

"PN" him...what does *that* stand for? I'm almost scared to ask...I'm certain the "P" stand for "penetration", but I'm at a loss as to the "N". :p

Yeah, I know, it's a typo...

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2004-09-15 12:01am

Ban the fucker. Sniping from a signature is not allowed for a reason.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

The Show Trial of Admiral Handsome

Ban Admiral_Handsome?