McAuliffe: Will GOP Answer If They Know Whether Stone, Others Had Involvement With CBS Documents?
Washington, D.C. - In response to false Republican accusations regarding the CBS documents, Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe issued this statement:
“In today’s New York Post, Roger Stone, who became associated with political ‘dirty tricks’ while working for Nixon, refused to deny that he was the source the CBS documents.
“Will Ed Gillespie or the White House admit today what they know about Mr. Stone’s relationship with these forged documents? Will they unequivocally rule out Mr. Stone’s involvement? Or for that matter, others with a known history of dirty tricks, such as Karl Rove or Ralph Reed?”
McAuliffe: Will GOP Answer If They Know Whether Stone, Others Had Involvement With CBS Documents?
Washington, D.C. - In response to false Republican accusations regarding the CBS documents, Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe issued this statement:
“In today’s New York Post, Roger Stone, who became associated with political ‘dirty tricks’ while working for Nixon, refused to deny that he was the source the CBS documents.
“Will Ed Gillespie or the White House admit today what they know about Mr. Stone’s relationship with these forged documents? Will they unequivocally rule out Mr. Stone’s involvement? Or for that matter, others with a known history of dirty tricks, such as Karl Rove or Ralph Reed?”
Methinks they've been talking to Elfdart, who already proposed this theory.
McAuliffe: Will GOP Answer If They Know Whether Stone, Others Had Involvement With CBS Documents?
Washington, D.C. - In response to false Republican accusations regarding the CBS documents, Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe issued this statement:
“In today’s New York Post, Roger Stone, who became associated with political ‘dirty tricks’ while working for Nixon, refused to deny that he was the source the CBS documents.
“Will Ed Gillespie or the White House admit today what they know about Mr. Stone’s relationship with these forged documents? Will they unequivocally rule out Mr. Stone’s involvement? Or for that matter, others with a known history of dirty tricks, such as Karl Rove or Ralph Reed?”
Methinks they've been talking to Elfdart, who already proposed this theory.
You know, it wouldn't surprise me in the SLIGHTEST. Rove really is that smart and that evil. Elfdart already thought of this? Good job, Elfdart. The man sees deeply.
The wisdom of PA:
-Normal Person + Anonymity + Audience = Total Fuckwad
I have lived in Texas for over twenty years. I know Rove's m.o.. First anonymous phone calls, fliers and such slandering the opposing candidate. The claim that Mark White passed "no pass/ no play" because he's a communist who hates football, that Ann Richards is a lesbian, that McCain has a black love child. Then "independent" groups (like the Shit Boaters and Ted Sampley) accuse war heroes of being cowards and traitors.
Then the "incident".
In 1986, Rove ran the campaign for Bill Clements against Mark White, who beat him four years earlier. A week or so before the election, an electronic bug was found in Clements' campaign office. Rove shrieked it was Mark White's doing and White's dastardly henchmen must have done it the night before because Rove & co. found it when they opened that morning. The police found a hole in Rove's story: The batteries in the bug were of very short duration, which would have ruled out someone planting them during the night.
In 2000, a Bush/ Cheney debate preparation tape was mailed to the Gore campaign and someone -guess who!- squealed that Gore had infiltrated the Bush campaign.
Was Rove behind this farce? I don't know, but given his past it's a possibilty.
I heard about that. Rove bugs his own office to beat down on candidate. I am filled with anger. Not that he did it, mind, but that everyone still believed him. The man's a genius, but an evil genius.
The wisdom of PA:
-Normal Person + Anonymity + Audience = Total Fuckwad
Bugsby wrote:I heard about that. Rove bugs his own office to beat down on candidate. I am filled with anger. Not that he did it, mind, but that everyone still believed him. The man's a genius, but an evil genius.
Yep its good to have him running the show
Sudden power is apt to be insolent, sudden liberty saucy; that behaves best which has grown gradually.