VP debates

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2004-10-05 09:37pm

Cheney is bullshitting about Zarqawi. I hope Edwards nails him for it.

aten_vs_ra · Post by **aten_vs_ra** » 2004-10-05 09:41pm

frigidmagi · Post by **frigidmagi** » 2004-10-05 09:41pm

Cheney "I'd like more than 30 seconds."

Mod "Well that's all you got."

SsssLllllAaaaaPpppp!!!!

Bitch smacking the VP, no rule change for you!

aten_vs_ra · Post by **aten_vs_ra** » 2004-10-05 09:44pm

Edwards stop singing with the Israeli amen chorus

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-10-05 09:45pm

DAMN! Cheney just blasted Edwards on his attendance.

Edwards' response should be interesting.

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2004-10-05 09:47pm

Edwards' response should be interesting.

It was the most blatant red herring I've seen in the debates thus far.

frigidmagi · Post by **frigidmagi** » 2004-10-05 09:47pm

Edwards stop singing with the Israeli amen chorus

Stop Cheney from the "He has a undignitified record." whine chrous first.

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2004-10-05 09:47pm

A great comeback Edwards should use: "I'll match my attendance record in the Senate against Bush's attendance record in the Air National Guard."

Too bad he's being Mr. Nice Guy.

Superman · Post by **Superman** » 2004-10-05 09:48pm

Does Cheney remind anyone else of Mr. Burns from Simpsons?

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2004-10-05 09:49pm

So far I'm impressed by both of them, but I'd give Cheney the edge.

Gustav32Vasa · Post by **Gustav32Vasa** » 2004-10-05 09:50pm

Thet both very good, at not answering the questions

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-10-05 09:50pm

Joe wrote:
Edwards' response should be interesting.
It was the most blatant red herring I've seen in the debates thus far.

Actually, Cheney did comment on Edwards' voting record toward the end of his salvo on Edwards' attendance. Edwards just focused on that part of the response. And honestly, I don't blame him. He can't argue with a simple fact like that.

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2004-10-05 09:51pm

FactCheck.org is getting hammered with traffic right now.

Marksist · Post by **Marksist** » 2004-10-05 09:51pm

oooh Cheney said many children were helped by no child left behind. How have they been helped Dick?

aten_vs_ra · Post by **aten_vs_ra** » 2004-10-05 09:53pm

Joe wrote:FactCheck.org is getting hammered with traffic right now.

good it's not just me. can anyone find cheney's attendence record?

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2004-10-05 09:54pm

Cheney's rebuttal to this will probably contain a reference to this week's tax cut bill.

Gustav32Vasa · Post by **Gustav32Vasa** » 2004-10-05 09:54pm

If you lover taxes how will you pay for things?

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-10-05 09:54pm

Edwards' last response on the deficit was very direct. I was impressed by that.

aten_vs_ra · Post by **aten_vs_ra** » 2004-10-05 09:55pm

Gustav32Vasa wrote:If you lover taxes how will you pay for things?

That's what I ask the the Bushies every day.

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2004-10-05 09:56pm

Joe wrote:Cheney's rebuttal to this will probably contain a reference to this week's tax cut bill.

Speak of the devil! God, I fucking rock.

Gustav32Vasa · Post by **Gustav32Vasa** » 2004-10-05 09:56pm

Joe wrote:Cheney's rebuttal to this will probably contain a reference to this week's tax cut bill.

you were right

Gustav32Vasa · Post by **Gustav32Vasa** » 2004-10-05 10:00pm

They cut the debate

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-10-05 10:01pm

More of this "marriage is between a man and a woman" shit from both.

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2004-10-05 10:02pm

Oh dear...I guess the full faith and credit clause doesn't matter.

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2004-10-05 10:02pm

Ugh! This kind of thing makes me glad I took my Lisinopril.