creationistalltheway wrote:Thats an e-mail from weemadando. As he requested I post it on creatioinweb for the members to see, here it is.
Disclaimer: it's needless to say I don't agree with the points he listed.
SBollinger:
SBollinger wrote:Well, #1, you haven't been banned. You and several others have been made "inactive". I read through your 5 CreationWeb obssessed threads. Your, and several, others comments were "intriguing" to say the least. So don't go playing all innocent like you guys don't have an agenda.
As for banning, I looked through your ban threads over there. Seems you're not so open-minded as you would like everyone to think. Seems "freedom of expression" is your interpretation at your board. Imagine that. You own the board - you make the rules.
5 threads on this board...that sort of seems like, I don't know, unnatural...sort of stalker-like.
We have discussed a debate with one of our guys and one of yours. However, it won't happen on your site.
I think we should haul out the Big Guns™. This is gonna take a while...
Pathetic cowardly worms. And what the hell is this " you haven`t been banned your accounts have been made inactive" bullshit? I`ll slap a verbal "agenda" upside their virtual faces, chickenshit pussies!
I would agree toi another debat ewith creationistalltheway. BUT, the mods must agree on rules for the debate, AND must be posted to both forums. PLUS, we reserve the right to post any and all materials to this forum, without permission from them.
Frank Hipper wrote:Pathetic cowardly worms. And what the hell is this " you haven`t been banned your accounts have been made inactive" bullshit? I`ll slap a verbal "agenda" upside their virtual faces, chickenshit pussies!
In other words, they haven't IP banned us. I can't login as jairyn, but I can lurk around there.
Maybe. We'll see. They more than likely won't lift mine (see above post). You must have been on "probation." They cower at the very mention of my name, btw.
Opening five threads is suddenly illegal on their boards?
You might also want to say how freedom of expression goes along with being open-minded, and how having an agenda does not make one guilty of any crime, or how you do not, in fact, own SD.net. Mike Wong does.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul
Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner
"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000
Master of Ossus wrote:Opening five threads is suddenly illegal on their boards?
You might also want to say how freedom of expression goes along with being open-minded, and how having an agenda does not make one guilty of any crime, or how you do not, in fact, own SD.net. Mike Wong does.
*AHEM* Apparently, opening threads on OUR boards is illegal on THEIR boards because we somehow manage to breach intellectual territory, ie, we went over there and said soemthin about it and they claimed that we can't tlak shit about them on our own private boards. *Whew*breath* Thusly, they will continue to state that we can't post on their boards safely unless we are undercover, and/or we are willing to abide byt he rules that the BIble is the only way to win, the only way to debate, etc,etc,etc....*Whew*gasp*wheeze*cough*hack up a lung*heavy breath*
