Iran claims to have processed tons of uranium

[frigidmagi]

this is CNN, we know where you live

Iran Says It Has Processed Tons of Uranium

By ALI AKBAR DAREINI

TEHRAN, Iran (AP) - Iran said Wednesday it has processed several tons of raw ``yellowcake'' uranium to prepare it for enrichment - a key step in developing atomic weapons - in defiance of the U.N. nuclear watchdog agency.

Converting raw uranium into hexafluoride gas does not violate any agreements Iran has made regarding its nuclear program and was done with the full knowledge of the International Atomic Energy Agency. However, it draws Iran and the United States - which quickly voiced its disapproval - closer to a showdown before the U.N. Security Council.

The IAEA board of governors specifically demanded last month that Iran stop all enrichment-related activities, and cited the plans to convert raw uranium into hexafluoride gas as particularly alarming. Iran has refused to back down, and its parliament is studying a bill that would require the government to proceed with the enrichment process over any objections.

Hossein Mousavian, Iran's chief delegate to the IAEA, would not specify how much hexafluoride gas had been produced, but he told The Associated Press in an interview that a few tons of raw uranium - also known as yellowcake - had been converted.


The conversion process yields nearly the same amount of gas, meaning a few tons would have been produced.


``We have used part of the raw uranium we had. A few tons of yellowcake has been converted,'' Mousavian told the AP.


``We are not in a hurry to do it,'' he added. ``The amount we've produced is (for) an experimental process, not industrial production.''


It also is less than what experts estimate would be required to make a single bomb - something Iran insists it has no intention of doing.


A diplomat close to the agency told the AP in Vienna that although the conversion does not contradict Iran's obligations, it will be viewed by some countries as a provocation.


In the United States, the White House quickly disapproved, with spokesman Scott McClellan again accusing Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons and saying it must give up the quest.


``The international community is speaking very clearly to Iran: If they continue in the direction they are going we will have to look at what additional action may need to be taken, including looking to the U.N. Security Council,'' he said.


Last month, the IAEA's board of governors unanimously passed a resolution demanding for the first time that Iran freeze all work on uranium enrichment, including conversion. The board suggested Iran could ultimately face U.N. sanctions if it defied the demands.


Mousavian, who also heads the Foreign Policy Committee at Iran's Supreme National Security Council, said the IAEA ``knows of every milligram of uranium converted.''


In Vienna, IAEA spokeswoman Melissa Fleming agreed the process was ``being done fully under IAEA's watch,'' but said she could not immediately confirm how far the Iranians had gotten.


``Inspectors are visiting that facility and we have other verification tools that are providing us with constant information about the operation of that facility,'' Fleming said.


Uranium hexafluoride gas is the material that, in the next stage, is fed into centrifuges used to enrich uranium. Uranium enriched to a low level is used to produce nuclear fuel to generate electricity and enriched further can be used to manufacture atomic bombs.


Iran said last month that it had started converting about 40 tons of raw uranium being mined for enrichment, but Wednesday's remarks were the first confirmation Iran had gone beyond creating precursors to the gas.


Thus far, Iran has said it is honoring a pledge not to put uranium hexafluoride gas into centrifuges, spin it and make enriched uranium. That, however, could change soon.


In Iran, the nuclear program is a matter of national pride - an area where the conservative parliament and reformist government of President Mohammad Khatami agree. Legislation being drafted by conservative lawmakers to force the government to resume uranium enrichment ultimately is expected to be approved.


Mousavian said, however, that Iran is ready to guarantee that its nuclear program will not be diverted to military use and to take steps to eliminate concerns.


``IAEA is the responsible body for nonproliferation. Iran is prepared to consider any IAEA proposal to take specific measures that its nuclear program will not be diverted toward weapons in the future. The specific measures should be defined by the IAEA,'' he said.


Mousavian warned that the international community, not Iran, will suffer if Iran is sanctioned. He reiterated Iranian warnings that Tehran would then stop implementing what is known as the additional protocol to the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, which allows unfettered IAEA inspections of Iranian facilities.


``Referring Iran to the U.N. will not change the nuclear capability we already possess. The victim will be the additional protocol and NPT (nonproliferation treaty), not Iran,'' he said.

So... Uh... Yeah... Not Good, I think folks. Your thoughts?

[BlkbrryTheGreat]

The suspicious side of me thinks that they're trying to provoke a military response.

[Einhander Sn0m4n]

I'll believe it when I see a

[The Silence and I]

... A little late to anything about it, but it would be damning proof...

[SyntaxVorlon]

Good thing we invaded Iran....oh wait.

[Admiral Valdemar]

If Israel isn't fired up about this already then this has certainly brought the match closer to the powder keg.

[Gustav32Vasa]

I'll believe it when I see a


Nukey

That is something I dont want to see.

[Darth Wong]

The suspicious side of me thinks that they're trying to provoke a military response.

From whom? The Americans have pretty much tied themselves in a straitjacket by invading Iraq, and have lost the flexibility to do anything else for years. The Israelis could do it, but that would play into the hands of Muslim fanatics worldwide by radicalizing more Islamic moderates against the Israel/US/UK axis of "freedom".

[Alan Bolte]

Most states are the sort to do a test as a show of strength rather than just attack outright. I do hope that's what he meant.

[BlkbrryTheGreat]

The Israelis could do it, but that would play into the hands of Muslim fanatics worldwide by radicalizing more Islamic moderates against the Israel/US/UK axis of "freedom".

I certainly couldn't see why Iranian Ayatollas would want that....

From whom? The Americans have pretty much tied themselves in a straitjacket by invading Iraq, and have lost the flexibility to do anything else for years.

The airforce isn't bogged down, an airstrike is viable. [/quote]

[The Kernel]

The airforce isn't bogged down, an airstrike is viable.

It might be viable but I am dubious as to the effectiveness of it if indeed they are developing nukes in secret.

[Ma Deuce]

The airforce isn't bogged down, an airstrike is viable.

It might be viable but I am dubious as to the effectiveness of it if indeed they are developing nukes in secret.

The facilities required to refine weapons grade nuclear materals or actually produce nuclear warheads (in any reasonable amount of time, that is) are rather large, and the location of many of Iran's nuclear-related facilities have been confirmed. Even if a large-scale airstrike doesn't obliterate their nuclear program, it will set it back considerably.