Oops... SW weapons ranges

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Jean Paul
Deimos Sock Puppet
Posts: 274
Joined: 2002-09-29 12:46pm

Oops... SW weapons ranges

Post by Jean Paul »

Falcon Pic

Han at this point is saying "he's almost in range".

The TIE is no more than 100-200 meters distant at most.

Visuals are the ultimate canon.

What does this mean?
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Post by Mange »

It means that you haven't been checking Mike's site. I suggest you look at the Wong-Darkstar debate. I suggest you check better before posting threads like this.

EDIT: On this page, http://h4h.com/louis/falconrange/falconrange.html, Wayne Poe had an excellent discussion about MF's weapon range (in response to Dorkstar). He has had some problems with his site, but go there when it's working.
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Post by Connor MacLeod »

He's firing from the cockpit (which is known officially - EGV&V, Courtship of Princess Leia) to reduce accuracy. He's aparently visually targeting a ship that would have a TINY targeting profile (look at how narrow the ship is from front and rear - you HAVE to get close to hit it accurately!). EW is a third factor (either as a possible side effect of Alderaan's destruction, which is implied in the novel, or because of the DS1, or because of the TIE itself.)

Its also known the Falcon is always in a nigh-constant state of repairs/upgrade/maintenance, and its possible that at this point the Targeting computer needed replacement or repair and so was not working as well as it should.

We should also note that at the end when he saves Luke from VAder (as demonstrated by Wayne numerous times), Han fired on Vader's Wingmen from a range at LEAST an order of magnitude greater than in the Alderaan-destruction scene, and probably much more than that. Semi-canon or official sourcecs have placed the Falcon's effective weapons range as between hundreds of kilometers and hundreds of thousands of kilometers (depending on source and variables.)
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

There's in X-wing:Alliance(PC game) you can detect weapons lock (both cannons and warheads) as far as I know there's nothing in higher canon that counterdicts this. so Han was probaly not using he's targeting computer at all. It's one to try to fire a TIE that doesn't your gonna shoot it and shooting a TIE during combat (Falcon is no warship).
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Why does this even matter? I don't know why anybody thinks this proves anything about the weapons range of any vessel other than the Falcon, which at this time was nothing more than a smuggler's freighter. Sure, in ROTJ it was used as a combat vessel, but by then Solo was a General in the Rebellion and the ship had undoubtedly been heavily upgraded.

In ANH, he didn't even have enough money to pay Jabba; what would make anyone think he would be able to build a freighter capable of taking out fighters at range? The Falcon was built to run, not to fight. He didn't even know the TIE was there until it took a shot at him and then tried to draw him toward the Death Star!

And when they were trying to escape the Death Star later, he had to use those crappy turrets which were never used again in TESB or ROTJ. The widespread use of this scene as an attack against SW weaponry is typical of Darkstar's fallacious mentality: find the weakest example you can and then write a whole page about it while ignoring other examples of the class and acting as though it is representative of the entire group (Falcon for all SW weapons, AT-ST for all Imperial armour, the rubber part of a scout trooper's uniform for the entire armour system, etc). It's meant to appeal to people who are too stupid to see through this blindingly obvious fallacy, which would explain the poor intellectual calibre of the few people who actually take him seriously.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

those crappy turrets which were never used again in TESB or ROTJ
There were some cut-scenes from the ROTJ battle showing Rebel gunners manning those turrets. But I´m not sure this counts. Nor is it an endorsement of the idea that the Falcon´s cannons in ANH represent all military-grade cannons, if anyone was wondering. ^_^;;
User avatar
Jean Paul
Deimos Sock Puppet
Posts: 274
Joined: 2002-09-29 12:46pm

Post by Jean Paul »

Darth Wong wrote:Why does this even matter? I don't know why anybody thinks this proves anything about the weapons range of any vessel other than the Falcon, which at this time was nothing more than a smuggler's freighter. Sure, in ROTJ it was used as a combat vessel, but by then Solo was a General in the Rebellion and the ship had undoubtedly been heavily upgraded.

In ANH, he didn't even have enough money to pay Jabba; what would make anyone think he would be able to build a freighter capable of taking out fighters at range? The Falcon was built to run, not to fight. He didn't even know the TIE was there until it took a shot at him and then tried to draw him toward the Death Star!

And when they were trying to escape the Death Star later, he had to use those crappy turrets which were never used again in TESB or ROTJ. The widespread use of this scene as an attack against SW weaponry is typical of Darkstar's fallacious mentality: find the weakest example you can and then write a whole page about it while ignoring other examples of the class and acting as though it is representative of the entire group (Falcon for all SW weapons, AT-ST for all Imperial armour, the rubber part of a scout trooper's uniform for the entire armour system, etc). It's meant to appeal to people who are too stupid to see through this blindingly obvious fallacy, which would explain the poor intellectual calibre of the few people who actually take him seriously.
Good points.

Conceeded.
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Post by McC »

Never used again? They're used pretty clearly in the ROTJ battle scene -- check the scene when the Falcon dives under the medical frigate. I'm fairly certain it's firing from the turrets at this point.
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

McC wrote:Never used again? They're used pretty clearly in the ROTJ battle scene -- check the scene when the Falcon dives under the medical frigate. I'm fairly certain it's firing from the turrets at this point.
Nope, it's firing from the front, and it's chasing the TIE like a fighter would, rather than playing B-17 bomber the way it did in ANH.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Mange
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4179
Joined: 2004-03-26 01:31pm
Location: Somewhere in the GFFA

Post by Mange »

Darth Wong wrote:
McC wrote:Never used again? They're used pretty clearly in the ROTJ battle scene -- check the scene when the Falcon dives under the medical frigate. I'm fairly certain it's firing from the turrets at this point.
Nope, it's firing from the front, and it's chasing the TIE like a fighter would, rather than playing B-17 bomber the way it did in ANH.
Mike, since you have both the wide- and fullscreen versions of the DVD's perhaps it's easier for you to judge (I have the widescreen edition), but to me it seems that only one shot at least appear to come from the mandibles (the inside cockpit view), while the scene showing Falcon chasing down the TIE shows the shots coming from the ventral turret.
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Post by McC »

Huh...didn't even think it had more than one front gun...
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
ntstlkr
Youngling
Posts: 55
Joined: 2004-10-02 02:03am
Location: NoVa
Contact:

Post by ntstlkr »

Cheers All,

I haven't checked the movies to be certain but it was my impression that the MF's manouvering was much more violent and energetic in ESB and ROTJ than in ANH (of course the RL rationalization is the improvement in sfx photo technique).

I would think that gunners would be hard pressed to do anything worthwhile in that kind of a situation (what with all the manouvering between the MF and targets, a gunner might get a second or two at most to aquire a target, bring the guns to bare, and fire).

It would be better to have the guns locked down into position and fire control slaved to the cockpit.
"Heart grow Stronger, Will is Firm, Mind more Calm, as our Strength lessons..."
Battle of Malden, 991 AD
User avatar
Jean Paul
Deimos Sock Puppet
Posts: 274
Joined: 2002-09-29 12:46pm

Post by Jean Paul »

It's possible that with the money he got from the alliance in ANH, he might have upgraded the avionics significantly, allowing for much sharper manouvering.
Image
User avatar
The Original Nex
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: 2004-10-18 03:01pm
Location: Boston, MA

Post by The Original Nex »

He most likely did make some major upgrades after he "joined" the Rebellion. Too bad they didn't pay off his debt to Jabba though...
User avatar
Meest
Jedi Master
Posts: 1429
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:04am
Location: Toronto

Post by Meest »

Not sure where I heard this but was it explained that the viewports can show a zoomed view at all?
User avatar
The Original Nex
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1593
Joined: 2004-10-18 03:01pm
Location: Boston, MA

Post by The Original Nex »

Meest wrote:Not sure where I heard this but was it explained that the viewports can show a zoomed view at all?
The ITWOT.
Transparisteel viewports equipped with magnification scanners that provide close-up views of deep space battles. (pg 44)
While this specifically refers to Palpatine's tower on the DSII, it goes without saying that this is a common technology in a society such as SW.
Post Reply