Why is Star Trek so vurnerable to ions?
Moderator: Vympel
- Dooey Jo
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3127
- Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
- Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
- Contact:
Why is Star Trek so vurnerable to ions?
I mean, damn, every time they happen to be in an "ion storm" they loose their shields and their panels start exploding. And the most wierd thing of them all is that the ship starts shaking when they are hit by ions. Hmm, do they have extremely large ions in Star Trek or just extremely crappy ships?
And for all of you who didn't allready know; ions are electrically charged atoms. Not particulary dangerous.
And if this have been discussed before, show me the thread or tell me why ions are so dangerous in Star Trek. Please
And for all of you who didn't allready know; ions are electrically charged atoms. Not particulary dangerous.
And if this have been discussed before, show me the thread or tell me why ions are so dangerous in Star Trek. Please
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...
Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...
Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 2002-09-13 12:41pm
- Isolder74
- Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
- Posts: 6762
- Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
- Location: Weber State of Construction University
- Contact:
The only place is space that Ions should be a problem is in a nebula or close to a star's corona. In Star Trek they appear to be everywhere.
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
I'm not really sure what an ion-storm is. Perhaps a cloud of ejected plasma from some star?? A shock-wave from a supernova?
In any case, Trek ships are ill-equiped to handle them. I believe borg cubes have fallen victim to them also (didn't Voyager find a disabled one?). Doesn't say much about Trek's ability to withstand ion-based weapons. Could be Trek's reliability on frequency-specific protection. This is all speculation of course.
In any case, Trek ships are ill-equiped to handle them. I believe borg cubes have fallen victim to them also (didn't Voyager find a disabled one?). Doesn't say much about Trek's ability to withstand ion-based weapons. Could be Trek's reliability on frequency-specific protection. This is all speculation of course.
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 2002-09-13 12:41pm
I think a number of nebula have had deterimental effects on Trek ships... although I can't think of an example ... Hmm, there was that Insurrection nebula that blocked all communication. Wasn't there a DS9 episode with Cardassian ships showing effects from being in a particular nebula?ClaysGhost wrote:I don't think most nebulae pose much threat to shipping, ions or no.
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Why is Star Trek so vurnerable to ions?
What episode did this happen in, where you say they lost their shields and panels started to explode?Dooey Jo wrote:I mean, damn, every time they happen to be in an "ion storm" they loose their shields and their panels start exploding. And the most wierd thing of them all is that the ship starts shaking when they are hit by ions. Hmm, do they have extremely large ions in Star Trek or just extremely crappy ships?
- Moonshadow
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 244
- Joined: 2002-09-29 02:54am
- Spanky The Dolphin
- Mammy Two-Shoes
- Posts: 30776
- Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
- Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)
I think it was the Mutara Nebula. Was there any reason given why it screwed with sensors. Of course, Considering that it wasn't totally dark or anything, why didn't they have guys just run to the windows with compasses and relay the info to fire control. Oh wait, they're idiots.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:In ST II, the nebula effected sensors to the point where they basically had to shoot by sight and shields were useless, IIRC.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
- Slartibartfast
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6730
- Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
- Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
- Contact:
Well, to be fair, the visibility in the nebula could have been much worse than showed on-screen. Visual canon or not, often movies show absolute darkness as simply black & white or mild darkness (so we can see them)neoolong wrote:I think it was the Mutara Nebula. Was there any reason given why it screwed with sensors. Of course, Considering that it wasn't totally dark or anything, why didn't they have guys just run to the windows with compasses and relay the info to fire control. Oh wait, they're idiots.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:In ST II, the nebula effected sensors to the point where they basically had to shoot by sight and shields were useless, IIRC.
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 2002-09-13 12:41pm
Nebulae in scifi tend to be rather bizarre. It took a reasonably long integration on the Eagle nebula to get those famous HST pictures of the big columns of dust, but B5 slapped the resulting image on as a texture mapped background to one of the bigger battles. With the naked eye, or a camera, you'd see nothing like that. There are plenty of examples in other shows and films - drama will win over reality, every time. Slow explosions, sounds in space and all. ST does take the crime to new heights, in that the Mutara nebula appears like thick fog!
(3.13, 1.49, -1.01)
Originally, according to the director commentary on ST II there wasn't supposed to be sound in space in the movie. He didn't think it would fly with the producers so he didn't do it. Now, years later there is no sound in space in Firefly.ClaysGhost wrote:Nebulae in scifi tend to be rather bizarre. It took a reasonably long integration on the Eagle nebula to get those famous HST pictures of the big columns of dust, but B5 slapped the resulting image on as a texture mapped background to one of the bigger battles. With the naked eye, or a camera, you'd see nothing like that. There are plenty of examples in other shows and films - drama will win over reality, every time. Slow explosions, sounds in space and all. ST does take the crime to new heights, in that the Mutara nebula appears like thick fog!
Slartibartfast, you're right that we, as an audience, has to be able to see. But in one of the shots of the main screen the crew can see the Reliant. It's just that the image kept getting staticky. Of course, it may have been image enhanced or something.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
-
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 613
- Joined: 2002-09-13 12:41pm
- NecronLord
- Harbinger of Doom
- Posts: 27384
- Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
- Location: The Lost City
Re: Why is Star Trek so vurnerable to ions?
Its their lauded mass lightning feilds, clearly the ships weigh about as much as a protonDooey Jo wrote:Hmm, do they have extremely large ions in Star Trek or just extremely crappy ships?
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Shit for ships.
God forbid they should be hit by a Imperial ion cannon. If the warp core doesn't kill the crew, the ship explosively decompressing when the force field windows lose power will.
God forbid they should be hit by a Imperial ion cannon. If the warp core doesn't kill the crew, the ship explosively decompressing when the force field windows lose power will.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Uraniun235
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 13772
- Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
- Location: OREGON
- Contact:
Where the hell did you get the idea the windows are force fields?!?
In TNG, Data says the conference room behind the bridge has windows made of transparent aluminum.
As for the "reason" behind the interference...
In TNG, Data says the conference room behind the bridge has windows made of transparent aluminum.
But it looks so cool!ST does take the crime to new heights, in that the Mutara nebula appears like thick fog!
As for the "reason" behind the interference...
Trouble with the nebula, sir, is all that static discharge and gas clouds our tactical display. Visual won't function and shields will be useless.
God forbid anyone write a universe without uberstarships.Shit for ships.
God forbid they should be hit by a Imperial ion cannon. If the warp core doesn't kill the crew, the ship explosively decompressing when the force field windows lose power will.
- Kamakazie Sith
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7555
- Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Discharging gas clouds our tactical display.....visual won't function and shields will be useless. <---That's what they said.neoolong wrote:I think it was the Mutara Nebula. Was there any reason given why it screwed with sensors. Of course, Considering that it wasn't totally dark or anything, why didn't they have guys just run to the windows with compasses and relay the info to fire control. Oh wait, they're idiots.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:In ST II, the nebula effected sensors to the point where they basically had to shoot by sight and shields were useless, IIRC.
- Darth Yoshi
- Metroid
- Posts: 7342
- Joined: 2002-07-04 10:00pm
- Location: Seattle
- Contact:
ST:FC. Picard tells the woman that there is no window in his quarters, there's a force field instead.Uraniun235 wrote:Where the hell did you get the idea the windows are force fields?!?
My guess is that ions are hell on ST ships because the warp core is so damn volatile.
Fragment of the Lord of Nightmares, release thy heavenly retribution. Blade of cold, black nothingness: become my power, become my body. Together, let us walk the path of destruction and smash even the souls of the Gods! RAGNA BLADE!
Lore Monkey | the Pichu-master™
Secularism—since AD 80
Av: Elika; Prince of Persia
Lore Monkey | the Pichu-master™
Secularism—since AD 80
Av: Elika; Prince of Persia
Actually, they wren't in Picard's quarters in ST:FC when that comment was made. The fact that one window was a forcefield doesn't show that all of them are. Also, in ST:FC, when Picard is looking out his window just prior to Riker hading him the report on neutral zone activity, Picard's reflection is clearly visible, which would be impossible if his window was a forcefield.Darth Yoshi wrote:ST:FC. Picard tells the woman that there is no window in his quarters, there's a force field instead.Uraniun235 wrote:Where the hell did you get the idea the windows are force fields?!?
My guess is that ions are hell on ST ships because the warp core is so damn volatile.
data_link has resigned from the board after proving himself to be a relentless strawman-using asshole in this thread and being too much of a pussy to deal with the inevitable flames. Buh-bye.
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
So you now have data on the reflective properties of Federation atmospheric containment force fields on the Enterprise E? Please do share.data_link wrote:Actually, they wren't in Picard's quarters in ST:FC when that comment was made. The fact that one window was a forcefield doesn't show that all of them are. Also, in ST:FC, when Picard is looking out his window just prior to Riker hading him the report on neutral zone activity, Picard's reflection is clearly visible, which would be impossible if his window was a forcefield.Darth Yoshi wrote:ST:FC. Picard tells the woman that there is no window in his quarters, there's a force field instead.Uraniun235 wrote:Where the hell did you get the idea the windows are force fields?!?
My guess is that ions are hell on ST ships because the warp core is so damn volatile.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
And how often do windows have a control console JUST for the windows that just so happen to open up like a HATCH.Sea Skimmer wrote:So you now have data on the reflective properties of Federation atmospheric containment force fields on the Enterprise E? Please do share.data_link wrote:Actually, they wren't in Picard's quarters in ST:FC when that comment was made. The fact that one window was a forcefield doesn't show that all of them are. Also, in ST:FC, when Picard is looking out his window just prior to Riker hading him the report on neutral zone activity, Picard's reflection is clearly visible, which would be impossible if his window was a forcefield.Darth Yoshi wrote: ST:FC. Picard tells the woman that there is no window in his quarters, there's a force field instead.
My guess is that ions are hell on ST ships because the warp core is so damn volatile.
Windows on Fed ships are just that, windows with a physical material. That particular incident in First Contact was a forcefield.
Want further evidence? Just watch Generations and look at the Saucer crash on the planet again. You wouldn't have tree residue on a forcefield.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
And as to the topic. We have no proof that Fed ships are "vulnerable" to ions. All we know is that something they call ion storms (of unknown energy levels) can be dangerous to ST ships.
And the comment on warp cores and Ion Storms. We saw the Delta Flyer go through a storm that was powerful enough to send the Delta Flyer into an emergency landing that ended up having the DF burrow more then a KM through rock from the crash. Yet in that entire incident the warp core seemed fine.
And the comment on warp cores and Ion Storms. We saw the Delta Flyer go through a storm that was powerful enough to send the Delta Flyer into an emergency landing that ended up having the DF burrow more then a KM through rock from the crash. Yet in that entire incident the warp core seemed fine.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
- NecronLord
- Harbinger of Doom
- Posts: 27384
- Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
- Location: The Lost City
In "Dark Froniter" there is a borg sphere with great frickin holes in it, Janeway says "was it damaged in combat?" seven replies "No, an ion storm"Alyeska wrote:And as to the topic. We have no proof that Fed ships are "vulnerable" to ions. All we know is that something they call ion storms (of unknown energy levels) can be dangerous to ST ships.
And the comment on warp cores and Ion Storms. We saw the Delta Flyer go through a storm that was powerful enough to send the Delta Flyer into an emergency landing that ended up having the DF burrow more then a KM through rock from the crash. Yet in that entire incident the warp core seemed fine.
Thats pretty f**king vinerable!
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth