Wash. Times: Russia tied to Iraq's missing arms

[Joe]

take with a grain of salt, etc

Russian special forces troops moved many of Saddam Hussein's weapons and related goods out of Iraq and into Syria in the weeks before the March 2003 U.S. military operation, The Washington Times has learned.

    John A. Shaw, the deputy undersecretary of defense for international technology security, said in an interview that he believes the Russian troops, working with Iraqi intelligence, "almost certainly" removed the high-explosive material that went missing from the Al-Qaqaa facility, south of Baghdad.

    "The Russians brought in, just before the war got started, a whole series of military units," Mr. Shaw said. "Their main job was to shred all evidence of any of the contractual arrangements they had with the Iraqis. The others were transportation units."

    Mr. Shaw, who was in charge of cataloging the tons of conventional arms provided to Iraq by foreign suppliers, said he recently obtained reliable information on the arms-dispersal program from two European intelligence services that have detailed knowledge of the Russian-Iraqi weapons collaboration.

    Most of Saddam's most powerful arms were systematically separated from other arms like mortars, bombs and rockets, and sent to Syria and Lebanon, and possibly to Iran, he said.

    The Russian involvement in helping disperse Saddam's weapons, including some 380 tons of RDX and HMX, is still being investigated, Mr. Shaw said.

    The RDX and HMX, which are used to manufacture high-explosive and nuclear weapons, are probably of Russian origin, he said.

    Pentagon spokesman Larry DiRita could not be reached for comment.
    The disappearance of the material was reported in a letter Oct. 10 from the Iraqi government to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

    Disclosure of the missing explosives Monday in a New York Times story was used by the Democratic presidential campaign of Sen. John Kerry, who accused the Bush administration of failing to secure the material.

    Al-Qaqaa, a known Iraqi weapons site, was monitored closely, Mr. Shaw said.

    "That was such a pivotal location, Number 1, that the mere fact of & disappearing was impossible," Mr. Shaw said. "And Number 2, if the stuff disappeared, it had to have gone before we got there."

    The Pentagon disclosed yesterday that the Al-Qaqaa facility was defended by Fedayeen Saddam, Special Republican Guard and other Iraqi military units during the conflict. U.S. forces defeated the defenders around April 3 and found the gates to the facility open, the Pentagon said in a statement yesterday.

    A military unit in charge of searching for weapons, the Army's 75th Exploitation Task Force, then inspected Al-Qaqaa on May 8, May 11 and May 27, 2003, and found no high explosives that had been monitored in the past by the IAEA.

    The Pentagon said there was no evidence of large-scale movement of explosives from the facility after April 6.

    "The movement of 377 tons of heavy ordnance would have required dozens of heavy trucks and equipment moving along the same roadways as U.S. combat divisions occupied continually for weeks prior to and subsequent to the 3rd Infantry Division's arrival at the facility," the statement said.

    The statement also said that the material may have been removed from the site by Saddam's regime.

    According to the Pentagon, U.N. arms inspectors sealed the explosives at Al-Qaqaa in January 2003 and revisited the site in March and noted that the seals were not broken.

    It is not known whether the inspectors saw the explosives in March. The U.N. team left the country before the U.S.-led invasion began March 20, 2003.

    A second defense official said documents on the Russian support to Iraq reveal that Saddam's government paid the Kremlin for the special forces to provide security for Iraq's Russian arms and to conduct counterintelligence activities designed to prevent U.S. and Western intelligence services from learning about the arms pipeline through Syria.

    The Russian arms-removal program was initiated after Yevgeny Primakov, the former Russian intelligence chief, could not persuade Saddam to give in to U.S. and Western demands, this official said.

    A small portion of Iraq's 650,000 tons to 1 million tons of conventional arms that were found after the war were looted after the U.S.-led invasion, Mr. Shaw said. Russia was Iraq's largest foreign supplier of weaponry, he said.

    However, the most important and useful arms and explosives appear to have been separated and moved out as part of carefully designed program. "The organized effort was done in advance of the conflict," Mr. Shaw said.

    The Russian forces were tasked with moving special arms out of the country.

    Mr. Shaw said foreign intelligence officials believe the Russians worked with Saddam's Mukhabarat intelligence service to separate out special weapons, including high explosives and other arms and related technology, from standard conventional arms spread out in some 200 arms depots.

    The Russian weapons were then sent out of the country to Syria, and possibly Lebanon in Russian trucks, Mr. Shaw said.

    Mr. Shaw said he believes that the withdrawal of Russian-made weapons and explosives from Iraq was part of plan by Saddam to set up a "redoubt" in Syria that could be used as a base for launching pro-Saddam insurgency operations in Iraq.

    The Russian units were dispatched beginning in January 2003 and by March had destroyed hundreds of pages of documents on Russian arms supplies to Iraq while dispersing arms to Syria, the second official said.
    
Besides their own weapons, the Russians were supplying Saddam with arms made in Ukraine, Belarus, Bulgaria and other Eastern European nations, he said.

    "Whatever was not buried was put on lorries and sent to the Syrian border," the defense official said.

    Documents reviewed by the official included itineraries of military units involved in the truck shipments to Syria. The materials outlined in the documents included missile components, MiG jet parts, tank parts and chemicals used to make chemical weapons, the official said.

    The director of the Iraqi government front company known as the Al Bashair Trading Co. fled to Syria, where he is in charge of monitoring arms holdings and funding Iraqi insurgent activities, the official said.

    Also, an Arabic-language report obtained by U.S. intelligence disclosed the extent of Russian armaments. The 26-page report was written by Abdul Tawab Mullah al Huwaysh, Saddam's minister of military industrialization, who was captured by U.S. forces May 2, 2003.

    The Russian "spetsnaz" or special-operations forces were under the GRU military intelligence service and organized large commercial truck convoys for the weapons removal, the official said.

    Regarding the explosives, the new Iraqi government reported that 194.7 metric tons of HMX, or high-melting-point explosive, and 141.2 metric tons of RDX, or rapid-detonation explosive, and 5.8 metric tons of PETN, or pentaerythritol tetranitrate, were missing.

    The material is used in nuclear weapons and also in making military "plastic" high explosive.

    Defense officials said the Russians can provide information on what happened to the Iraqi weapons and explosives that were transported out of the country. Officials believe the Russians also can explain what happened to Iraq's weapons of mass destruction programs. ;

[Vympel]

What a surprise. A huge amount of missing mundane conventional explosives (which idiots like Cavuto on Fox attempted to make part of Iraq's 'WMD' arsenal- accusing all those 'left-wing' media outlets of saying that Iraq had none- fuckwit- sorry, just had to mention this) becomes the focus of the campaign- by all accounts, and this load of spin by some third-rate Bush underling comes out rehashing the same old tired no-evidence accusations against Syria and Lebanon (how convenient), throwing Russia into the mix as well for good measure. Not surprisingly, the Wash. Times runs it.

I don't know about anyone else, but does Russian GRU spetsnaz trolling around Iraq doing Saddam's dirty-work in the leadup to an invasion by the US, bothering to move around mundane stuff like RDX and HMX that was probably extracted from weapons the USSR sold Iraq etc- sound remotely plausible? I guess in the final days of the election, they're saying just about anything- besides, when some third-rate minion makes some stupid utterance, its unlikely to bite anyone who matters in the arse later on.

[dr. what]

Er...correct me if I'm wrong but weren't everybody making a big deal about spy planes and satellites examining every square inch of Iraq every minute right until the invasion? Wouldn't somebody have noticed all those Russian trucks crossing the borders?

Besides--doesn't Russia already have thousands upon thousands of tons of all this stuff already in their arsenals? Why send valuable personnel and equipment into a volatile situation to grab stuff you already have, knowing full well that if anything goes wrong or somebody gets caught, you're guaranteed to really piss off the U.S.?

[SyntaxVorlon]

Someone untie them quick!
(Sorry couldn't help it, I saw the thread title and it was impossible to pass up)

It's probably bullshit. But if it isn't Putie Put is in for some serious shit.

[Patrick Degan]

Well, this is Bill Gertz talking here —a man I understand who gets half his material transcribing the gossip off the Pentagon bathroom walls.

[Sea Skimmer]

Er...correct me if I'm wrong but weren't everybody making a big deal about spy planes and satellites examining every square inch of Iraq every minute right until the invasion?

The capability is more like every square inch every couple days or weeks, at best.

Wouldn't somebody have noticed all those Russian trucks crossing the borders?

Considering that Iraq, Iran and Syria all have huge numbers of Soviet built trucks, probably not. But this suggestion that Russia took them is still quite absurd in all ways.

[dr. what]

Considering that Iraq, Iran and Syria all have huge numbers of Soviet built trucks, probably not. But this suggestion that Russia took them is still quite absurd in all ways.

Thanks for the info.

What parts of this story do you consider absurd?

[MKSheppard]

Well, this is Bill Gertz talking here —a man I understand who gets half his material transcribing the gossip off the Pentagon bathroom walls.

I just noticed that the source is named and asserted; always something to watch for with Gertz. If it's "unnamed sources" it's rumour.