FarenHYPE 9/11

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2004-10-28 07:45am

http://www.fahrenhype911.com/

Oh give me a fucking break. Are you serious? Come on. WHAT? These are just some of the phrases that may come to your mind when you see what I have to show you. The republicans, lacking creative power of their own, now attempt to siphon off some of the democrat's! like some kind of political "leech on a tick"....

Whoopee.

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2004-10-28 08:05am

These wankers and others like them are like fleas crawling up an elephant's leg with rape on their minds.

Tech^salvager · Post by **Tech^salvager** » 2004-10-28 08:32am

Finally I know where the site is for this.

theski · Post by **theski** » 2004-10-28 08:34am

Elfdart wrote:These wankers and others like them are like fleas crawling up an elephant's leg with rape on their minds.

Too bad you have another 4 years of it coming up

Iceberg · Post by **Iceberg** » 2004-10-28 08:36am

theski wrote:
Elfdart wrote:These wankers and others like them are like fleas crawling up an elephant's leg with rape on their minds.

Too bad you have another 4 years of it coming up

Hopefully people will have enough sense to realize that the difference between a giant douche and a turd sandwich is that a giant douche is still useful.

theski · Post by **theski** » 2004-10-28 08:53am

Iceberg wrote:
theski wrote:
Elfdart wrote:These wankers and others like them are like fleas crawling up an elephant's leg with rape on their minds.

Too bad you have another 4 years of it coming up
Hopefully people will have enough sense to realize that the difference between a giant douche and a turd sandwich is that a giant douche is still useful.

Iceberg...Well you still have the Vikings on Nov 3rd...

and you were right all along about DEAN.. he should have been the man..

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2004-10-28 08:57am

theski wrote:
Elfdart wrote:These wankers and others like them are like fleas crawling up an elephant's leg with rape on their minds.

Too bad you have another 4 years of it coming up

So you'll STILL be voting for Bush? Even after all the threads exposing him as a liar and an idiot? Why vote for an idiot? Are you an idiot too? Is that what you're saying? I just don't understand.

theski · Post by **theski** » 2004-10-28 09:12am

BoredShirtless wrote:
theski wrote:
Elfdart wrote:These wankers and others like them are like fleas crawling up an elephant's leg with rape on their minds.

Too bad you have another 4 years of it coming up
So you'll STILL be voting for Bush? Even after all the threads exposing him as a liar and an idiot? Why vote for an idiot? Are you an idiot too? Is that what you're saying? I just don't understand.

I would vote for Rudi If I could... but I will hold my nose and pull the Lever for Bush...

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2004-10-28 09:14am

Can't you hold your nose and vote for Kerry?

theski · Post by **theski** » 2004-10-28 09:16am

BoredShirtless wrote:Can't you hold your nose and vote for Kerry?

Sorry BS>... not gonna happen .... I would have voted for Dean before Kerry...... or Lieberman.... or even Edwards

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2004-10-28 09:19am

But why?

Iceberg · Post by **Iceberg** » 2004-10-28 09:20am

Indeed... Why of all the possible choices do you have to pick the worst?

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2004-10-28 09:21am

I saw Fahrenheit 9/11 with my bro at the uni cinema this Tuesday and enjoyed it greatly. I check IMDb.com's boards and find this film has already been released and check out some of the arguments. Well, I may not jump on the Moore bandwagon and praise him openly, but these conservative tosspots need to learn to get a grip (and some better arguments).

theski · Post by **theski** » 2004-10-28 09:23am

BoredShirtless wrote:But why?

I am a ABK voter.... I would vote Badnarik if his stance on Terrorism was a bit tougher.....

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2004-10-28 09:34am

theski wrote:I am a ABK voter.....

Why? Is it Kerry's policies? Something he said?

theski · Post by **theski** » 2004-10-28 09:39am

BoredShirtless wrote:
theski wrote:I am a ABK voter.....
Why? Is it Kerry's policies? Something he said?

Lets see.... His voting record is Left of Teddy K.... No real Leadership... No real plan to do anything he talks about.... If you want more.... fine... but this is just my reason.... I speak only for myself

Darth Raptor · Post by **Darth Raptor** » 2004-10-28 09:44am

Next question: What's with all the freaking ellipses?

Iceberg · Post by **Iceberg** » 2004-10-28 09:44am

theski wrote:
BoredShirtless wrote:
theski wrote:I am a ABK voter.....
Why? Is it Kerry's policies? Something he said?
Lets see.... His voting record is Left of Teddy K....

GOP screaming point

No real Leadership...

GOP screaming point

No real plan to do anything he talks about....

No different than Dubya

So you've got two GOP screaming points and one semi-applicable point that can apply to any politician on the face of God's green Earth.

Iceberg · Post by **Iceberg** » 2004-10-28 09:45am

"But Jon, there is a serious credibility gap between what John Kerry says, and what George W. Bush says John Kerry means." - Stephen Colbert

theski · Post by **theski** » 2004-10-28 09:52am

Iceberg wrote:
theski wrote:
BoredShirtless wrote: Why? Is it Kerry's policies? Something he said?
Lets see.... His voting record is Left of Teddy K....
GOP screaming point

No real Leadership...
GOP screaming point

No real plan to do anything he talks about....
No different than Dubya

So you've got two GOP screaming points and one semi-applicable point that can apply to any politician on the face of God's green Earth.

But are you disagreeing with the talking points....???

His voting record is the most liberal......

He does not show any leadership, we even did a thread about that.

and In the case of the last Hell I agree with you but Still no on Kerry

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2004-10-28 09:52am

theski wrote:Lets see.... His voting record is Left of Teddy K....

Are you sure? Do you know the reasons for his votes?

No real Leadership...

How do you know? What has he led, which makes you think that?

No real plan to do anything he talks about....

Are you kidding? You think he has the time to layout plans for the issues he talks about? Don't be unreasonable.

If you want more.... fine... but this is just my reason.... I speak only for myself

Yes, I want more. This time, be reasonable.

Admiral Valdemar · Post by **Admiral Valdemar** » 2004-10-28 09:55am

Lazy Raptor wrote:Next question: What's with all the freaking ellipses?

Some people can somehow make a verbal trait purely literary. Quite amazing.

On the subject of voting, going by Bush's promotion videos on his website alone makes me want to throw all my weight behind any opposition. But then most of the US election is a pure cringeworthy cheese fest.

Iceberg · Post by **Iceberg** » 2004-10-28 10:08am

theski wrote:But are you disagreeing with the talking points....???

His voting record is the most liberal

You can't be the most liberal senator AND a flip-flopper.

He does not show any leadership, we even did a thread about that.

Link to thread? Or concrete examples in this one?

theski · Post by **theski** » 2004-10-28 10:10am

Voting record...

To be sure, Kerry's ranking as the No. 1 Senate liberal in 2003 -- and his earning of similar honors three times during his first term, from 1985 to 1990 -- will probably have opposition researchers licking their chops. As shown in the accompanying chart, Kerry had a perfect liberal rating on social issues during 10 of the 18 years in which he received a score, meaning that he did not side with conservatives on a single vote in those years. That included his 1996 vote, with 13 other Senate Democrats, against the Defense of Marriage Act, which prohibited federal recognition of states' same-sex marriage laws. Along the campaign trail, Republicans likely will remind voters of Kerry's stance on that issue.

http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0204/022704nj1.htm
On Leadership.
That has to be shown.

Kerry Exaggerates Role in Some Key Legislative Battles
He says he "led the fight" on several fronts, but few bills bear his name.

January 30, 2004
Modified: January 30, 2004
eMail to a friend Printer Friendly Version

Summary

John Kerry is fond of saying "I led the fight" on a lot of things -- against Arctic drilling, against Bush's Medicare prescription drug legislation, for federal grants for 100,000 new police officers, against Newt Gingrich's attempts to lessen environmental regulations.

But reporters who cover Congress often gave others credit for the leading roles in some of those fights -- with scant mention of Kerry.

And The Associated Press last July found that only eight laws had Kerry as their lead sponsor, five of them "ceremonial," two relating to the fishing industry, and one providing federal grants to support small businesses owned by women.

I believe that a challenger should have a plan if he claims his Ideas are better... again that is just me

http://factcheck.org/article134.html

theski · Post by **theski** » 2004-10-28 10:14am

Iceberg wrote:
theski wrote:But are you disagreeing with the talking points....???

His voting record is the most liberal
You can't be the most liberal senator AND a flip-flopper.

He does not show any leadership, we even did a thread about that.
Link to thread? Or concrete examples in this one?

Yes you can and he is..see above post

http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic.php?t=53944

Here is the way vote for Kerry thread. Other than Elfdart no one could seem to answer the question