Yeah I know what ya mean. Gundam is just to classic to get angry with. *Hugs Tallgeese model*Yes, Gundam is weak. But I still love it with all my heart. [icon_mrgreen.gif]

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
Yeah I know what ya mean. Gundam is just to classic to get angry with. *Hugs Tallgeese model*Yes, Gundam is weak. But I still love it with all my heart. [icon_mrgreen.gif]
Yes, calm yourself. Then fill your mind with pr^H^Hinformation and see the lightweemadando wrote:Yeah, sorry... Got to calm down a bit...phongn wrote:So the history books written in the US are wrong and the ones written elsewhere are right?weemadando wrote: *thwap* Read some non-US history books.
Indeed, but it was still a creation traded with the Soviets. And not a factor directly responsible for their collapse as MoO claimed.[/quote]SDI was a bluff. There really wasn't any real chance of its deployment (we did not have the lift capacity even if we did have all the satellites to move) but it very much scared the USSR, who did think that we could do it - and they could not afford to counter it.Star Wars was a system ceded in talks with the Russians in order to prevent them from rapidly increasing their ground based missile stocks.
Radar hooked up to a fire control computer, I think. Maybe some EO sensors as well.NecronLord wrote:How does it target them?
They've already tested them against rocket salvos. I doubt the information on traverse or track time is public, though it isn't exactly a difficult problem.How long does it take to track?
To travese
These things are not going to be much use against barrages.
There was a homing beacon on the target RV, yes, but the EKV didn't have the recieve on it. Only the interim boost rocket did to point it in the general direction. They were doing that because the X-Band radars at the test range wasn't operational yet (it is now).I seem to rember that the pevious test missiles all had homing devices in them, and still the thing didn't hit very well.
OTOH, THEL has proven itself against rocket salvos in tests. Patriot was more or less rushed into service as a TBM system, of which PAC-2 wasn't designed for (PAC-3 is, though).Frankly, like the patriot missiles last time, the israelis are getting a croc. I hope they aren't paying.
Patriot was a SAM designed to knock down aircraft which was deployed in inaduite numbers to knock down totally different targets. Not surpising that it failed to get the warhead and rahter did was it was suppost to do and exploded against the biggest target, the missile body.NecronLord wrote:How does it target them?
How long does it take to track?
To travese
These things are not going to be much use against barrages.
I seem to rember that the pevious test missiles all had homing devices in them, and still the thing didn't hit very well. Frankly, like the patriot missiles last time, the israelis are getting a croc. I hope they aren't paying.
I actually found a group of fundie idiots that wanted to carve Jesus's face in the moon. They still do, i think. http://www.jhs2.com/jhs/index.htmlMr Bean wrote:Now we need to link six of these in a Phaser Array and then Target....
THE MOON!
So I want to carve my name up there so what?
Yes but those bastard Joe's Foiled Corba Commanders Brillant idea, oh poor Commander, friend of the working man, saver of puppies and kittens and here comes the Joe's to kick sand in his eyeDidn't something like this happen in GIJOE, the cartoon?
The laser fires a low power pulse to clear the water out of the main pulse, which comes a fraction of a second later. This would make it fairly effective in high moister areas, clouds and light fog, but heavy storm clouds or actual rain would make it ineffective at long ranges.TrailerParkJawa wrote:This unit would be very useful to protect airbases from random arty and rocket attacks in places like Afghanistan.
Anyword on what kind of weather conditions this thing can operate in?
Is heavy cloud cover a big problem?