Genetic engineering

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Genetic Engeering, yes or no?

Yes
34
92%
No
3
8%
 
Total votes: 37

User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22464
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

Uh, how can you boost morality by genetic engineering? And what does it have to do with Superman? Unless you want some really moral people.
Exuse me let me clarfiy, "Guilt" has been identifed, the genes that control people who can't harm a bug or go on bloody mass murders and feel fine was ID back in Sep 99 according to Nationa Medical Jourunal(Or whatever its name is now)

Turn this up and down and you can get somone who will walk through Forrests with Bunnies and songbirds running with them VS the person who walks into a Forest and orders a Nuke Strike to use a Comparison ;)

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Mr Bean wrote:
Uh, how can you boost morality by genetic engineering? And what does it have to do with Superman? Unless you want some really moral people.
Exuse me let me clarfiy, "Guilt" has been identifed, the genes that control people who can't harm a bug or go on bloody mass murders and feel fine was ID back in Sep 99 according to Nationa Medical Jourunal(Or whatever its name is now)

Turn this up and down and you can get somone who will walk through Forrests with Bunnies and songbirds running with them VS the person who walks into a Forest and orders a Nuke Strike to use a Comparison ;)
Ah. Cool. That's pretty neat.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

SInce everybody seems to like ignoring me today, what is everyone's opinions on GMOs? GMOs are as much part of genetic engineering as "furthering the race."
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

verilon wrote:SInce everybody seems to like ignoring me today, what is everyone's opinions on GMOs? GMOs are as much part of genetic engineering as "furthering the race."
Uh what does the O part stand for again?
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

neoolong wrote:
verilon wrote:SInce everybody seems to like ignoring me today, what is everyone's opinions on GMOs? GMOs are as much part of genetic engineering as "furthering the race."
Uh what does the O part stand for again?
Genetically Modified Organisms.....this commonly refers ot genetically modified foods.
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
data_link
Jedi Master
Posts: 1195
Joined: 2002-11-01 11:55pm
Location: Gone to cry in his milk

Post by data_link »

verilon wrote:SInce everybody seems to like ignoring me today, what is everyone's opinions on GMOs? GMOs are as much part of genetic engineering as "furthering the race."
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to ignore you, I just wasn't paying attention to your posts. :P

GMO's are great, but given that most foods these days are already GE, I think this issue has already been settled in the affirmative.
data_link has resigned from the board after proving himself to be a relentless strawman-using asshole in this thread and being too much of a pussy to deal with the inevitable flames. Buh-bye.
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

data_link wrote:
verilon wrote:SInce everybody seems to like ignoring me today, what is everyone's opinions on GMOs? GMOs are as much part of genetic engineering as "furthering the race."
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to ignore you, I just wasn't paying attention to your posts. :P

GMO's are great, but given that most foods these days are already GE, I think this issue has already been settled in the affirmative.
Not my point. And they have not been settled. That is why we have issues with peanut allergies, and such.
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

verilon wrote:
neoolong wrote:
verilon wrote:SInce everybody seems to like ignoring me today, what is everyone's opinions on GMOs? GMOs are as much part of genetic engineering as "furthering the race."
Uh what does the O part stand for again?
Genetically Modified Organisms.....this commonly refers ot genetically modified foods.
Ah. Well I think they're okay as long as they are made responsibly. Also, I think that any genes that come from other organisms should be listed. Wouldn't want a tomato with white fish genes given to someone allergic to fish.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

neoolong wrote:
verilon wrote:
neoolong wrote: Uh what does the O part stand for again?
Genetically Modified Organisms.....this commonly refers ot genetically modified foods.
Ah. Well I think they're okay as long as they are made responsibly. Also, I think that any genes that come from other organisms should be listed. Wouldn't want a tomato with white fish genes given to someone allergic to fish.
True. But that is my point: a lot of times, people aren't allergic to the foods until they were GMOs to begin with! (Again with the peanut example).
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Yup. Though, it's a slightly academic point. That is the best case and the case that should be tried for.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
HemlockGrey
Fucking Awesome
Posts: 13834
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:21pm

Post by HemlockGrey »

Yes!

First megawatt lasers, then genetically altered blue hair...


GUNDAM LIVES!
The End of Suburbia
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses

"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
User avatar
Exonerate
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4454
Joined: 2002-10-29 07:19pm
Location: DC Metro Area

Post by Exonerate »

And Purple hair for Misato :lol:

BoTM, MM, HAB, JL
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Exonerate wrote:And Purple hair for Misato :lol:
Too much Eva for you. Out, Eva obssession, out. Of course while I'm writing this I happen to have Eva on in the background. :D
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Darth Yoshi
Metroid
Posts: 7342
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:00pm
Location: Seattle
Contact:

Post by Darth Yoshi »

I think having hot pink hair would be nice. *looks around* What?

Seriously, though. As long as it's properly regulated and monitored, I'm all for genetic engineering.
Image
Fragment of the Lord of Nightmares, release thy heavenly retribution. Blade of cold, black nothingness: become my power, become my body. Together, let us walk the path of destruction and smash even the souls of the Gods! RAGNA BLADE!
Lore Monkey | the Pichu-master™
Secularism—since AD 80
Av: Elika; Prince of Persia
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22464
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

Screw proper controls Lets bleed as many Bastard Breeds of who knows what!


Just only on the moon not on earth and not before we get a fool-proof self destruct and a horrendsly complicated self destruct as well. :wink:

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
ViciousMink
Youngling
Posts: 82
Joined: 2002-09-17 01:06am
Location: Winter Park, FL

Post by ViciousMink »

Genetic engineering has great promise for us as a whole. A great deal of problems can be resolved or at least addressed. At the same time, it's the proverbial two-edged sword: it can harm us at least as much as it can help.

The trouble comes up when one realizes that only government regulation can restrict some of the more egregious research, and to what extent the government regulates something is basaed entirely upon what yahoos are in office. Since genetic engineering as a term is really vague and non-specific, it can be expected that governments will be equally non-specific and vague in their controls imposed up research.

The trouble is, governments are restricting research and not use. The potentials are already there, it's not like they'll never see the light of day if we don't research them. And they will; someone, somewhere, even in secret, will discover everything the governments don't want people learning about gengineering. Wether it happens now or later (or far too late to do something about whatever a rogue gengineer comes up with) depends on just how deep into the sand the lawmakers have their heads.

I feel that there are ethical limits to what research should be undertaken, but these are fairly loose, especially compared to the ethical limits to what actual gengineering should be undertaken. Just because we can do a thing does not mean that we must do that thing... but sometimes we have to learn how to do that nebulous 'thing' before we can find the other 'things' which will be of greatest benefit.

Gengineering can hold many horrors, yes. But we won't be able to beat whatever horrors come up, or the riches and rewards beyond, without conducting the research.

P.S. Darth Yoshi, where did you get your avatar from? =)
The Jedi asked, "What is balance for me as a servant of the Light?" The Master replied,"Balance is not what you seek. For you it is accepting that destruction is a part of the universe."
-- from Koans of the Silver Master
Founder, the Cult of Wilhelm. "Praise be to Wilhelm. AAAAIIIIUH!"
User avatar
Cpt_Frank
Official SD.Net Evil Warsie Asshole
Posts: 3652
Joined: 2002-07-03 03:05am
Location: the black void
Contact:

Post by Cpt_Frank »

Gengineering can hold many horrors, yes. But we won't be able to beat whatever horrors come up, or the riches and rewards beyond, without conducting the research.
I absolutely concur.
Image
Supermod
User avatar
Nick
Jedi Knight
Posts: 511
Joined: 2002-07-05 07:57am
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Contact:

Post by Nick »

Batman wrote:Nevertheless, considering that genetic engineering has been around for millenia, and, as it's THERE, the abuses will happen anyway, we may just as wll reap the benefits and try our level best to curb the atrocities.
ViciousMink wrote:Gengineering can hold many horrors, yes. But we won't be able to beat whatever horrors come up, or the riches and rewards beyond, without conducting the research.
Kinda says it all really. . .
"People should buy our toaster because it toasts bread the best, not because it has the only plug that fits in the outlet" - Robert Morris, Almaden Research Center (IBM)

"If you have any faith in the human race you have too much." - Enlightenment
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

Gengineering can hold many horrors, yes. But we won't be able to beat whatever horrors come up, or the riches and rewards beyond, without conducting the research.
Yes, this is true...
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
kojikun
BANNED
Posts: 9663
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:23am
Contact:

Post by kojikun »

Anyone ever seen the Nietzscheans from Andromeda? Thats how I think GE should go. We should start modifying ourselves so we can tolerate great heats and colds, so we can breath in noxious fumes and merely go "mm smells nice", so we can withstand extreme gravity, or none at all, with no side effects, increase intelligence, stamina, lifespan, fertility, immune systems, everything.

But this must be coupled with a good education and such. We dont need uberFundies, only uberScientists. :p
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
User avatar
Gil Hamilton
Tipsy Space Birdie
Posts: 12962
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
Contact:

Post by Gil Hamilton »

neoolong wrote:Ah. Well I think they're okay as long as they are made responsibly. Also, I think that any genes that come from other organisms should be listed. Wouldn't want a tomato with white fish genes given to someone allergic to fish.
This doesn't make much sense to me. People who are allegic to fish aren't allergic to everything in fish, just particular chemicals produced by fish biology. A specific gene, just because it comes from a fish, would not effect a person who's allergic to fish, unless the particular gene's purpose is growing structures that produce that chemical that the person with fish allergies can't have in the first place. I remember reading about those tomatos with fish genes. They are taken from flounders and help make the organism with them more resistant to freezing. This wouldn't effect a person with fish allergies. After all, it's just one genegroup.
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Gil Hamilton wrote:
neoolong wrote:Ah. Well I think they're okay as long as they are made responsibly. Also, I think that any genes that come from other organisms should be listed. Wouldn't want a tomato with white fish genes given to someone allergic to fish.
This doesn't make much sense to me. People who are allegic to fish aren't allergic to everything in fish, just particular chemicals produced by fish biology. A specific gene, just because it comes from a fish, would not effect a person who's allergic to fish, unless the particular gene's purpose is growing structures that produce that chemical that the person with fish allergies can't have in the first place. I remember reading about those tomatos with fish genes. They are taken from flounders and help make the organism with them more resistant to freezing. This wouldn't effect a person with fish allergies. After all, it's just one genegroup.
Yes, but how are you going to test what exactly in the fish makes the exact person allergic. It is much more logical to just tell the person they may get sick and so to avoid it. I know they aren't allergic to everything, but if you don't warn them exactly what parts are in, they may still get sick.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Gil Hamilton
Tipsy Space Birdie
Posts: 12962
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
Contact:

Post by Gil Hamilton »

neoolong wrote:Yes, but how are you going to test what exactly in the fish makes the exact person allergic. It is much more logical to just tell the person they may get sick and so to avoid it. I know they aren't allergic to everything, but if you don't warn them exactly what parts are in, they may still get sick.
Do scratch tests with the tomato. This will easily determine whether the tomato is dangerous. Considering that they've done this repeatedly before they were even close to grocery shelves, you'd think if it could make people sick, testing would show it by now. Telling people that it might make them sick when there is no allergens in the tomato that it will actually make them sick is more than a little silly.
Most people who are worried about genetically engineered foods, despite the rigorous testing the FDA puts them through, are the same types of people who think that power lines cause cancer.
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Gil Hamilton wrote:
neoolong wrote:Yes, but how are you going to test what exactly in the fish makes the exact person allergic. It is much more logical to just tell the person they may get sick and so to avoid it. I know they aren't allergic to everything, but if you don't warn them exactly what parts are in, they may still get sick.
Do scratch tests with the tomato. This will easily determine whether the tomato is dangerous. Considering that they've done this repeatedly before they were even close to grocery shelves, you'd think if it could make people sick, testing would show it by now. Telling people that it might make them sick when there is no allergens in the tomato that it will actually make them sick is more than a little silly.
Most people who are worried about genetically engineered foods, despite the rigorous testing the FDA puts them through, are the same types of people who think that power lines cause cancer.
What exactly are scratch tests? And is it only a small number of things in fish that potentially cause allergic reactions? Can it be that something will not cause an allergic reaction in one person that is allergic to fish and yet someone will be affected?
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Gil Hamilton
Tipsy Space Birdie
Posts: 12962
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
Contact:

Post by Gil Hamilton »

neoolong wrote:What exactly are scratch tests? And is it only a small number of things in fish that potentially cause allergic reactions? Can it be that something will not cause an allergic reaction in one person that is allergic to fish and yet someone will be affected?
Haven't you every had a scratch test? I thought that is something that everyone takes some time in their life.
The basic idea is simple. You have a person who you are testing to see whether something is an allergen. A person is given a small scratch and the substance that they are testing is applied to the scratch. If they are allergic to the substance, there will be a reaction beyond any normal reaction to the substance.
In the case of a genetically engineered tomato triggering fish allergies, it would be simple. The FDA holds a cattle call for people who are known to have allergic reactions to fish. Three scratch tests are given. The first is the whitefish that they got the specific gene from to confirm that they are allergic to the fish. The second is an ordinary home grown tomato, to confirm that they are not allergic to tomatoes, too. Then they do a scratch test with the altered tomato. Since the gene-spliced tomato is identical to the ordinary tomato except for the gene and it's resultant structure, if they test the same, then the anti-freezing gene doesn't produce allergens.
Note that the FDA requires all foods and drugs it has tested to publish every single reaction during testing. Every single one. If only one person has a problem during clinical, even if the problem has absolutely nothing to do with the product, they food or drug companies are legally required to print it on the packaging and commercials of the product. Ever seen those commercials for drugs where they say "Side effects may include..." then list a string of medical problems? Say, nausea. It's because some people during the clinic trials reported that they were nauseous that day, which many times has nothing to do with the product. The fact that gene-spliced tomatoes don't have warnings for people with fish allergies and they they've been through clinical trials is proof that a connection doesn't exist, since many, many heads would roll if they failed to report and label the connection.
Post Reply