99.8% of FCC Complaints Filed By Christianazi Group.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2004-12-11 03:52pm

exactly, and well mine could count as a phyrric victory, as they have gotten me as a surrogate dad involved in their subject matter (not that I didn't police what Roo, watched before, or arranged his web access so he couldn't visit mommy, and her BF's favorite sites), but no, their harrassment through the local school mailing list and emergency contact list is pissing me off!

Tech^salvager · Post by **Tech^salvager** » 2004-12-11 05:14pm

Darth Wong wrote:
Tech^salvager wrote:Yeah for the Fundies
Fundies +1 SDN 0

That is strike one, you trolling little shitstain. Either back this up with a logical argument for the ethical validity of this behaviour or shut the fuck up, troll. We have no patience for people who spout bullshit and can't back it up around here.

It was sarcasm.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-12-11 05:14pm

Hard to tell when you've got a "Bush for president!" line in your sig.

Einhander Sn0m4n · Post by **Einhander Sn0m4n** » 2004-12-11 06:12pm

Tech^salvager wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
Tech^salvager wrote:Yeah for the Fundies
Fundies +1 SDN 0

That is strike one, you trolling little shitstain. Either back this up with a logical argument for the ethical validity of this behaviour or shut the fuck up, troll. We have no patience for people who spout bullshit and can't back it up around here.
It was sarcasm.

Ah right, ok

First rule of sarcasm: If you have to tell your audience it's sarcasm, it's not sarcasm. Same thing with comedy.

Vendetta · Post by **Vendetta** » 2004-12-11 07:22pm

First rule of sarcasm: If you have to tell your audience it's sarcasm, it's not sarcasm. Same thing with comedy.

No, the first rule of sarcasm is that it never works in print.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2004-12-11 11:19pm

Vendetta wrote:First rule of sarcasm: If you have to tell your audience it's sarcasm, it's not sarcasm. Same thing with comedy.

No, the first rule of sarcasm is that it never works in print.

And HTML tags only work on phpBB when HTML is enabled.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-12-12 12:17am

Tech^salvager wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
Tech^salvager wrote:Yeah for the Fundies
Fundies +1 SDN 0

That is strike one, you trolling little shitstain. Either back this up with a logical argument for the ethical validity of this behaviour or shut the fuck up, troll. We have no patience for people who spout bullshit and can't back it up around here.
It was sarcasm.

Ah, I see. So we can add "sarcasm" to the list of things you suck at.

Tech^salvager · Post by **Tech^salvager** » 2004-12-12 11:02pm

Darth Wong wrote:
Tech^salvager wrote:
Darth Wong wrote: That is strike one, you trolling little shitstain. Either back this up with a logical argument for the ethical validity of this behaviour or shut the fuck up, troll. We have no patience for people who spout bullshit and can't back it up around here.
It was sarcasm.
Ah, I see. So we can add "sarcasm" to the list of things you suck at.

Go ahead

SyntaxVorlon · Post by **SyntaxVorlon** » 2004-12-13 12:52am

Durandal wrote:
Vendetta wrote:First rule of sarcasm: If you have to tell your audience it's sarcasm, it's not sarcasm. Same thing with comedy.

No, the first rule of sarcasm is that it never works in print.
And HTML tags only work on phpBB when HTML is enabled.

Irony however does work in print, even if it's not intentional.

Zeond · Post by **Zeond** » 2004-12-14 02:50am

Found this on the NYPost. Anyone know if this is the PTC's latest target?

December 13, 2004 -- THE Federal Communications Commission has asked NBC to submit a tape of its coverage of the Summer Olympics opening ceremonies to determine if some of the dancing was too sexy for TV.

NBC confirmed over the weekend that the FCC had asked for the tape from the first night of the Athens Olympics.

The commission usually does not initiate an investigation, but acts only after viewer complaints.

— Post staff writer

That's the whole article

Link: http://nypost.com/entertainment/36305.htm

I can't help myself. Found this on another forum.

JME2 · Post by **JME2** » 2004-12-14 02:58am

Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman · Post by **Kreshna Aryaguna Nurzaman** » 2004-12-14 03:46am

Frank Hipper wrote:I'm again reminded of prohibition, a repressive, hysterical special interest group with out of proportion influence.

Mind you, it was the prohibition's alcohol-banning policy that made Al Capone rich.