Canada Security Net Full of Holes

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
theski
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4327
Joined: 2003-01-28 03:20pm
Location: Hurricane Watching

Canada Security Net Full of Holes

Post by theski »

TORONTO - Canada's security net is full of holes, with most border crossings guarded by a lone staffer and airport security so lax that missing security badges and uniforms recently turned up for sale on eBay.

A new Senate security report calls for reform, a boost in defense spending and improved cooperation with the United States. Canadians have relied too long on luck to avoid a terrorist attack, it says, scolding: "Unfortunately, luck is notoriously untrustworthy."


The 315-page report by the Senate Standing Committee on National Security and Defense, the first released under the year-old government of Prime Minister Paul Martin, said most of Canada's 160 land and maritime border crossings have only one person at the posts.


"The potential damage to the Canadian economy and other consequences that would come with allowing a terrorist to infiltrate the U.S. through Canada are massive," the report said.


Securing the 4,000-mile border is paramount, to prevent terrorist attacks and protect some $1.4 billion in trade each day between the North American neighbors.


"All it would take is a serious terrorist incident, caused by someone slipping through Canada, to shut down the border, and that would be an absolute disaster," said Robert Bothwell, a professor at the University of Toronto who specializes in U.S.-Canadian relations.


The report, which some are calling alarmist and ineffectual — as it comes from the politically appointed upper house of parliament — noted that Canadian forces have been hit with budget cuts of about 30 percent between 1988 and 2000.


"Despite NATO (news - web sites)'s recent expansions, Canada remains mired third-last among the 26 member countries, ahead of only Luxembourg and Iceland," the report said. Iceland has no armed forces.


Canada promised to spend $6.2 billion over five years to improve border security after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks in the United States. The measures include better screening at the 89 federal airports, but critics say little has improved.


More than 1,000 airport security uniforms and badges disappeared in the first nine months of the year — some turning up later on the eBay online auction site. Transport Minister Jean Lapierre ordered an investigation into the disappearance of the uniforms and badges, which are required to gain access to restricted areas.


Though many Canadians and foreigners complain about long lines and delays due to security checks at Pearson International Airport near Toronto, the report concluded all checked baggage is not being comprehensively screened for explosives.


"Given that terrorists have proven themselves willing to commit suicide in order to achieve their goals, more rigorous inspection of checked baggage is required," it said.


According to the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority, explosives detection systems have been deployed at most of Canada's largest airports, and the authority has pledged all checked baggage will be screened by year's end. The Senate committee, however, said it will take at least another year before that happens.


The coast guard, meanwhile, is a "toothless" agency that is unarmed and reports to the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, the report said.


"Despite its name, the coast guard doesn't play a serious role in guarding our coasts," the senators said, recommending the agency answer to the Department of National Defense for security assignments.


Wesley Wark, a University of Toronto professor who is one of Canada's leading academic experts on security and intelligence, acknowledges the report paints a bleak scenario.


But he said the committee hoped to push the Martin administration to keep up the momentum on security issues and prevent Canadians from becoming too complacent about their own safety.





"They need to paint things in slightly alarmist hues in order to grab the Canadian public," Wark said. "With the growing criticism of the Bush White House foreign policy and the increasing sense that the whole policy of the war on terror is misguided and in error, it becomes increasingly difficult for Canadians to understand the need for national security spending."

He said there have been vast improvements in security relations between Washington and Ottawa, including cross-border security meetings and establishment of the Smart Border plan, which allows the legitimate flow of goods and people across the shared frontier.

Tom Ridge, outgoing U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, will meet with his Canadian counterpart, Anne McLellan, in Detroit on Friday to discuss areas of future cooperation.



Canada security
Sudden power is apt to be insolent, sudden liberty saucy; that behaves best which has grown gradually.
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Post by General Zod »

canada actually has a security net? *scratches head*
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
aerius
Charismatic Cult Leader
Posts: 14800
Joined: 2002-08-18 07:27pm

Post by aerius »

The problem isn't the security forces, the problem is the goddamn fucking bureaucratic paper-pushers in the customs & immigration system. Briefly put, the paper-pushers don't allow us to detain & deport known terrorists & other criminals, basically, once they get off the plane they can tie up the system and stay in Canada for at least a couple years. We know who they are, and we'd love to incarcerate or deport their asses, but the system doesn't let us.

More security forces will do jack shit. We need to completely re-write immigrations law & procedures.
Image
aerius: I'll vote for you if you sleep with me. :)
Lusankya: Deal!
Say, do you want it to be a threesome with your wife? Or a foursome with your wife and sister-in-law? I'm up for either. :P
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Post by Edi »

And all that aside, it's not as if Canadian security on the Canuck side of the US-Canadian border is the biggest potential flaw in the US security system. Their security systems are still not up to scratch, so this smacks to me of scapegoating in order to deflect attention from what is NOT being done in the US.

Edi
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
brianeyci
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9815
Joined: 2004-09-26 05:36pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Post by brianeyci »

Incarcerate people like Australia?

A guilded prison is still a prison. Most people who come into the country are not terrorists intent on creating a cell, and if a small miniscule percentage of them are going to do this is it fair to punish the others? They may not be citizens in your country, but they have rights and shouldn't be detained unless there is good reason to.

You're right. The immigration system does need to be changed, so more people can come in, as many as possible that Canada can let in, not less. It was a long time ago, maybe my first year of high school, when my geography teacher showed us a documentary of immigration officials rejecting applicants. It made me sick. Sometimes they just rejected applicants based on their "attitude". I know there is supposed to be a point based system, but what is the point of restricting the entry to engineers and doctors when we make them become taxicab drivers when they come in? No, immigration needs to be expanded, and no Australian style prison in Canada or I'll be one of the first to vote against whatever fucking government tries this (probably the conservatives, thank god they are too stupid to do anything).

Brian
User avatar
Glocksman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7233
Joined: 2002-09-03 06:43pm
Location: Mr. Five by Five

Post by Glocksman »

Edi wrote:And all that aside, it's not as if Canadian security on the Canuck side of the US-Canadian border is the biggest potential flaw in the US security system. Their security systems are still not up to scratch, so this smacks to me of scapegoating in order to deflect attention from what is NOT being done in the US.

Edi
Scapegoating? :?:

It's a Canadian Senate committee report, not a US Senate report.
"You say that it is your custom to burn widows. Very well. We also have a custom: when men burn a woman alive, we tie a rope around their necks and we hang them. Build your funeral pyre; beside it, my carpenters will build a gallows. You may follow your custom. And then we will follow ours."- General Sir Charles Napier

Oderint dum metuant
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28822
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Post by Broomstick »

A few days before January 1, 2000 a border guard stopped a car crossing from Cananda into the United States at Port Angeles, Washington

Inside were two Algerians who had been living in Canada for a couple years, explosives, a hotel reservation next to the Space Needle, and a ticket to London, England from Seattle, Washington for the very next morning.

There's plenty on Google, but here's a representative sample:
http://archives.cnn.com/2000/US/01/21/border.arrest.01/

While I find it reassuring that the evidence points to a significant terrorist event being halted by an alert border guard in 2000, they almost got through.

So, my friend Edi, this is not simply scare-mongering or scape-goating or a result of September 11, 2001. The threat has been there for quite some time, it's very real, and it's a problem for both sides of the border. As already pointed out, this report is Canadians criticizing Canada. Rest assured, there is considerable agitation on the US side about the lack of US border security. For a long time North America depended on sheer distance and the oceans to keep us safe but that won't work anymore.
Post Reply