Ultimate cloaking/stealth system

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

Post Reply
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Ultimate cloaking/stealth system

Post by Patrick Degan »

In science ficiton, we've seen a variety of invisibility, camoflauge, or stealth systems in use. Which one would you want for your starship?
  • Minbari stealth rig (Babylon 5) —a system which refracts and scatters incoming radiations from active sensor systems and diffuses/scatters outgoing radiation signals from the starship to confuse passive sensors. Does not render the ship invisible, but does make it difficult to track or accurately read it.
  • Cloaking device (Star Trek) —a system which renders a ship invisible through the selective bending of light rays. Very power intensive and renders the ship partially sensor-blind. An imperfect system, since it cannot mask subspace/EM radiations, a ship must "run silent" and employ an additional stealth device known as a nullifier core.
  • Cloaking device (Star Wars) —a system which uses a powerful gravitic distortion to induce a lensing effect, bending light and other radiations completely around the field perimetre and rendering the ship invisible. Also bends outgoing radiations back upon themselves. Renders a ship completely sensor-blind as a consequence. Also power intensive.
  • Chamelion Circuit (Doctor Who) —in TARDISes, a system which alters the external shell of the vehicle to resemble the size and shape of any object to enable the craft to blend in with its surroundings. Relies upon a very complex mathematics to make the system work properly.
  • The Somebody Else's Problem Field (The Hitchhikers' Guide To The Galaxy) —a simple system which can run off a torchlight battery and operates on the basic principle of a psychological barrier. Based upon the natural predisposition of the brain to simply ignore anything it does not wish to be concerned with, and thus regard any object masked by an SEP device as "somebody else's problem" and therefore not there in his/her/its eyesight. Just paint your starship (or even a mountain) pink with green and purple polkadots, erect a cheap and simple Somebody Else's Problem Field around it, and nobody will ever notice that the thing is there.
User avatar
Shinova
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10193
Joined: 2002-10-03 08:53pm
Location: LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

Post by Shinova »

I don't know much about a few of the listed cloaks, but I think I'll go for the cloaking system the Reman ship in ST: Nemesis uses.

Ship can fire while under cloak. Cloak can be raised/lowered in sections, making certain parts of the ship visible or invisible. And I think it was also said that there was no way it could be detected in the movie, I think.
What's her bust size!?

It's over NINE THOUSAAAAAAAAAAND!!!!!!!!!
HemlockGrey
Fucking Awesome
Posts: 13834
Joined: 2002-07-04 03:21pm

Post by HemlockGrey »

I'll chose the S.E.P, thank you very much.
The End of Suburbia
"If more cars are inevitable, must there not be roads for them to run on?"
-Robert Moses

"The Wire" is the best show in the history of television. Watch it today.
User avatar
Exonerate
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4454
Joined: 2002-10-29 07:19pm
Location: DC Metro Area

Post by Exonerate »

The Someone Else's Problem system isn't perfect... If I recall correctly, the ship was finally noticed after Arthur looked around for it a few times. The SW one is rather limited, because it leaves the ship blind, and takes much power. I'd go with the ST one.

BoTM, MM, HAB, JL
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22464
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Post by Mr Bean »

Some Elses Problem Field

The kind of cloaking that lets you walk through a used Car Place with a Barrel Full of Money and no one looks twice

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

The Somebody Else's Problem Field seems best, though a Star Wars cloak combine with a sensor stealthed periscope covered by a Star Trek cloak would make for some hot shit.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Stormbringer
King of Democracy
Posts: 22678
Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm

Post by Stormbringer »

Somebody Else's Problem Field, cheap, simple and effective.
Image
data_link
Jedi Master
Posts: 1195
Joined: 2002-11-01 11:55pm
Location: Gone to cry in his milk

Post by data_link »

Well, that depends. Obviously if you're going up against completely automated defenses, the SEP field will be useless. That being the case, I think the best stealth system is the good old RW radar absorbant paint and minimized emissions system. After all, it's the only one that doesn't require unobtanium to build.
data_link has resigned from the board after proving himself to be a relentless strawman-using asshole in this thread and being too much of a pussy to deal with the inevitable flames. Buh-bye.
User avatar
Enlightenment
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2404
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:38pm
Location: Annoying nationalist twits since 1990

Post by Enlightenment »

A few comments:

Since the Minbari stealth system doesn't make ships invisible it'll only work against enemies that aren't smart enough to figure out the obscure art of building and using visual tracking and targetting sensors. This isn't all that desirable against any enemy with more intelligence than, say, a retarded brick.

Furthermore, 'refracting' the IR signature of a starship to make it isotropic is going to make it stick out like a barn door in all directions rather than like a city in one direction and a building in all the others. This is rather bad if one is facing an enemy with enough skill to understand the obscure art of infrared search and targetting systems. Better hope alll your likely enemies have detection systems less effective than the incoming generation of western fighter aircraft....

In a physically-consistant universe, the Wars cloak will have the nice side effect rendering the ship entirely invulnerable to non-magic weapons fire. A gravity field strong enough to bend light around a ship isn't going to have any problems whatsoever deflecting a missile, nuclear explosion, or even the mass of a planet that happened to get in the ship's way. A ship equipped with this kind of device could drive through a star and not suffer any damage.

The downside to gravitational cloaking is that there's nowhere to dump heat. A ship can't remain cloaked for long without melting. A good way around this problem is to adapt the cloaking device so it can be selectively operated over certain hemispheres of the ship (e.g. those pointing towards the enemy) but left inactive over other areas. These other areas would then be used to radiate heat.


What would I pick? Modified Wars cloak. If the ship was small enough to do planetary landings I'd add a chamelion circuit as an alternate system for use within atmospheres and on the ground.
It's not my place in life to make people happy. Don't talk to me unless you're prepared to watch me slaughter cows you hold sacred. Don't talk to me unless you're prepared to have your basic assumptions challenged. If you want bunnies in light, talk to someone else.
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Enlightenment wrote:A few comments:

Since the Minbari stealth system doesn't make ships invisible it'll only work against enemies that aren't smart enough to figure out the obscure art of building and using visual tracking and targetting sensors. This isn't all that desirable against any enemy with more intelligence than, say, a retarded brick.

Furthermore, 'refracting' the IR signature of a starship to make it isotropic is going to make it stick out like a barn door in all directions rather than like a city in one direction and a building in all the others. This is rather bad if one is facing an enemy with enough skill to understand the obscure art of infrared search and targetting systems. Better hope alll your likely enemies have detection systems less effective than the incoming generation of western fighter aircraft....

In a physically-consistant universe, the Wars cloak will have the nice side effect rendering the ship entirely invulnerable to non-magic weapons fire. A gravity field strong enough to bend light around a ship isn't going to have any problems whatsoever deflecting a missile, nuclear explosion, or even the mass of a planet that happened to get in the ship's way. A ship equipped with this kind of device could drive through a star and not suffer any damage.

The downside to gravitational cloaking is that there's nowhere to dump heat. A ship can't remain cloaked for long without melting. A good way around this problem is to adapt the cloaking device so it can be selectively operated over certain hemispheres of the ship (e.g. those pointing towards the enemy) but left inactive over other areas. These other areas would then be used to radiate heat.


What would I pick? Modified Wars cloak. If the ship was small enough to do planetary landings I'd add a chamelion circuit as an alternate system for use within atmospheres and on the ground.
A gravity field that powerful would probably drag planet-sized masses along with it. Or something.
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

Enlightenment wrote:Since the Minbari stealth system doesn't make ships invisible it'll only work against enemies that aren't smart enough to figure out the obscure art of building and using visual tracking and targetting sensors. This isn't all that desirable against any enemy with more intelligence than, say, a retarded brick.
I can see a F-117. That doesn't make the F-117's low-observable characteristics entirely without merit. Granted, the Minbari aren't going to be tough to hit at close range, but longer range detection and target acquisition will be hampered.
Furthermore, 'refracting' the IR signature of a starship to make it isotropic is going to make it stick out like a barn door in all directions rather than like a city in one direction and a building in all the others. This is rather bad if one is facing an enemy with enough skill to understand the obscure art of infrared search and targetting systems. Better hope alll your likely enemies have detection systems less effective than the incoming generation of western fighter aircraft....
Radiating everything out in all directions again will be less effective at close range, but more effective at long range, as the sensors must have some detection threshhold beyond which detection is unlikely or impossible. Not perfect, but better than nothing.
[/quote]
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Enlightenment
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2404
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:38pm
Location: Annoying nationalist twits since 1990

Post by Enlightenment »

Howedar wrote:I can see a F-117. That doesn't make the F-117's low-observable characteristics entirely without merit. Granted, the Minbari aren't going to be tough to hit at close range, but longer range detection and target acquisition will be hampered.
The optical visibility of stealth aircraft is a big enough problem that they're only used at night--specifically when they can't be seen due to a lack of external illumination. Also in the F-117's favor are cloud decks, the optial horizon, and terrain features. Optical sensors just aren't all that useful for terrestrial antiaircraft work.

In space, however, it's a different story. There's no night, no clouds, and no terrain to hind behind. Given the high specular reflectivity of Minbari ships they're going to be extremely visible to passive optical sensors.
Radiating everything out in all directions again will be less effective at close range, but more effective at long range, as the sensors must have some detection threshhold beyond which detection is unlikely or impossible. Not perfect, but better than nothing.
It's worse than nothing.

The lower detection threshold for a 1998-vintage off-the-shelf commercial CCD sitting behind a 2 meter f/2 telescope is 2.5E-17w/m^2. For a target isotropically radiating a mere 1MW the detection range is in excess of 50 million kilometers.

Use the magic technology not to evenly radiate IR but to radiate heat in a narrow cone and the IR detection range for sensor platforms outside the emission cone drops to zero.
It's not my place in life to make people happy. Don't talk to me unless you're prepared to watch me slaughter cows you hold sacred. Don't talk to me unless you're prepared to have your basic assumptions challenged. If you want bunnies in light, talk to someone else.
User avatar
HRogge
Jedi Master
Posts: 1190
Joined: 2002-07-14 11:34am
Contact:

5th Imperium beats them all

Post by HRogge »

I would choose a 5th Imperium cloaking device.

- they are available for persons AND ships

- you can see from within the cloak

- you are really invisible, not just a sensor cloak. Even graviton sensors cannot detect you easily

- you can fire out of the cloak

Except a really advanced sensor array nothing helps against a 5th Imperium cloak.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

I should probably add that the chameleon sircuit reduces mass, so that an object disguised as a telephone box, has the mass, and sensor profile of a telephone box. It [usually] automatically changes itself to something suitible to the landing area. (yes they can be parked in space)
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Warspite
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1970
Joined: 2002-11-10 11:28am
Location: Somewhere under a rock

Post by Warspite »

I'll stay with the SEP field. But if the TARDIS problem is one of mathematics, I'll go also by that one, just have a big enough computer to do all the calculations. (Although, it might seem weird to see a phone box with a LOT of computers attached to it... :D )
[img=left]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v206/ ... iggado.jpg[/img] "You know, it's odd; practically everything that's happened on any of the inhabited planets has happened on Terra before the first spaceship." -- Space Viking
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Post by NecronLord »

They are on the inside, It's partially sentient. The inside is a set size regardless of what it appears as.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Warspite
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1970
Joined: 2002-11-10 11:28am
Location: Somewhere under a rock

Post by Warspite »

OK, putting aside SEP and Tardis, I'll have to go with the Minbari, although it's not a proper cloak like the other systems, it's more in the ECM category, they don't physically mask the ship (we can see it's THERE).

A side note: what happened to all the development of the ST:VI cloak? Could the Klingon stop trying it again? Or the Romulans?
[img=left]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v206/ ... iggado.jpg[/img] "You know, it's odd; practically everything that's happened on any of the inhabited planets has happened on Terra before the first spaceship." -- Space Viking
User avatar
Vendetta
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10895
Joined: 2002-07-07 04:57pm
Location: Sheffield, UK

Post by Vendetta »

Warspite wrote:I'll stay with the SEP field. But if the TARDIS problem is one of mathematics, I'll go also by that one, just have a big enough computer to do all the calculations. (Although, it might seem weird to see a phone box with a LOT of computers attached to it... :D )
No problem, a Tardis' internal volume is in no way linked to it's external dimensions.
God Emperor
Jedi Knight
Posts: 637
Joined: 2002-11-18 08:10pm
Location: somewhere I don't want to be

Post by God Emperor »

I don't know to much about the ones you said, but i like the one's in dune. The ship's are called noships, don't know why, well what it does is absorb all encoming radiation, and gives out the same amount of radiation as its surronding area.
Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn

I know that you believe that you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant.
User avatar
Pu-239
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4727
Joined: 2002-10-21 08:44am
Location: Fake Virginia

Post by Pu-239 »

Th noship cloak also acts like a phase cloak. It can also shoot when cloaked
:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:

ah.....the path to happiness is revision of dreams and not fulfillment... -SWPIGWANG
Sufficient Googling is indistinguishable from knowledge -somebody
Anything worth the cost of a missile, which can be located on the battlefield, will be shot at with missiles. If the US military is involved, then things, which are not worth the cost if a missile will also be shot at with missiles. -Sea Skimmer


George Bush makes freedom sound like a giant robot that breaks down a lot. -Darth Raptor
User avatar
Pu-239
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4727
Joined: 2002-10-21 08:44am
Location: Fake Virginia

Post by Pu-239 »

Correction- I think it only has limited phase cloak abilities, probably applying only to the harkonnen hideout and similar installations

ah.....the path to happiness is revision of dreams and not fulfillment... -SWPIGWANG
Sufficient Googling is indistinguishable from knowledge -somebody
Anything worth the cost of a missile, which can be located on the battlefield, will be shot at with missiles. If the US military is involved, then things, which are not worth the cost if a missile will also be shot at with missiles. -Sea Skimmer


George Bush makes freedom sound like a giant robot that breaks down a lot. -Darth Raptor
User avatar
Evil Sadistic Bastard
Hentai Tentacle Demon
Posts: 4229
Joined: 2002-07-17 02:34am
Location: FREE
Contact:

Re: Ultimate cloaking/stealth system

Post by Evil Sadistic Bastard »

Patrick Degan wrote: [*]The Somebody Else's Problem Field (The Hitchhikers' Guide To The Galaxy) —a simple system which can run off a torchlight battery and operates on the basic principle of a psychological barrier. Based upon the natural predisposition of the brain to simply ignore anything it does not wish to be concerned with, and thus regard any object masked by an SEP device as "somebody else's problem" and therefore not there in his/her/its eyesight. Just paint your starship (or even a mountain) pink with green and purple polkadots, erect a cheap and simple Somebody Else's Problem Field around it, and nobody will ever notice that the thing is there.
[/list]
Basically anything that makes them ignore your ship is the best.
Believe in the sign of Hentai.

BotM - Hentai Tentacle Monkey/Warwolves - Evil-minded Medic/JL - Medical Jounin/Mecha Maniacs - Fuchikoma Grope Attack!/AYVB - Bloody Bastards.../GALE Force - Purveyor of Anal Justice/HAB - Combat Medical Orderly

Combat Medical Orderly(Also Nameless Test-tube Washer) : SD.Net Dept. of Biological Sciences
Post Reply