Most beautifl actresses

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2005-01-12 11:27pm

Correct, redheads rule!

Grand Moff Yenchin · Post by **Grand Moff Yenchin** » 2005-01-13 02:34am

Peregrin Toker wrote:Nanako Matsushima: (best known as Reiko, the main character of Ringu)

OMFG I'm not the first to mention her!!!

Others:

Joan Chen
Miho Nakayama
Noriko Fujiwara
Diane Lane
Bridgitte Nielson (in the '80s of course!)
Sharon Stone (early '90s of course!)
Jennifer Connelly
Cate Blanchett
Kate Beckinsale
Gwyneth Paltrow
Liv Tyler

Crown · Post by **Crown** » 2005-01-13 06:22am

Nicole Kidman: She brings back a lot of that old 'grace' that Hollywood starlets used to have. She's in this new Channell comercial here in Greece and man is she fucking hot!

Monica Bellucci: The Sophia Loren of our generation to be sure, she is a bloody stunner!

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2005-01-13 09:26am

Stormbringer wrote:
Peregrin Toker wrote:If you mean Nicole Kidman as she looked when she was younger, you might have a point. Today, though, she looks pretty damn ghastly.
Ghastly? Are you on crack? Granted a couple of those pictures are not particularly flattering but she's still a fine looking woman, especially at her age. I'd do her in a heart beat.

Can't you see the way plastic surgery has wrecked her totally? Chain smoking probably hasn't helped either...

Nicole THEN:

Nicole NOW:

She's certainly not the most beautiful actress around - Uma Thurman and Amanda Tapping are both roughly the same age as Ms. Kidman and much prettier.

Stofsk wrote:I don't think she's ghastly, but I do wonder why she dyed her hair blond. Fucking hell, there's NOTHING wrong with redheads.

I don't understand it either... with natural redheads being so rare and natural blondes so common (well, in Denmark at least

), then why would any natural redhead bleach her hair like that?

Perhaps Nicole Kidman has a very strange sense of humour. Nothing wrong with that, either.

salm · Post by **salm** » 2005-01-13 09:49am

kidman is gruesome. check out her eyes in the pictures in which she´s smiling. cover her mouth with your finger. the eyes don´t look like she´s smiling. the eyes look like they want to rip you off.
she´s got the eyes of a politician.

Queeb Salaron · Post by **Queeb Salaron** » 2005-01-13 10:04am

salm wrote:kidman is gruesome. check out her eyes in the pictures in which she´s smiling. cover her mouth with your finger. the eyes don´t look like she´s smiling. the eyes look like they want to rip you off.
she´s got the eyes of a politician.

Oh my God... it's a skinny female Dick Cheney!!

Crown · Post by **Crown** » 2005-01-13 10:33am

I counter all of this Nicole bashing with an image from the chanel comercial;

Stunnig!

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2005-01-13 11:14am

She wouldn't be that pretty in that Chanel commercial if an army of make-up artist hadn't dolled her up beyond recognition.

Crown · Post by **Crown** » 2005-01-13 11:17am

Peregrin Toker wrote:She wouldn't be that pretty in that Chanel commercial if an army of make-up artist hadn't dolled her up beyond recognition.

HAhhahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha!

In a thread about movie stars I found that statement to be highly ironic!

Peregrin Toker · Post by **Peregrin Toker** » 2005-01-13 11:22am

Crown wrote:
Peregrin Toker wrote:She wouldn't be that pretty in that Chanel commercial if an army of make-up artist hadn't dolled her up beyond recognition.

HAhhahahahhahahahahahhahahahaha!

In a thread about movie stars I found that statement to be highly ironic!

Yeah, that probably applies to most of the people mentioned here... however, here, we have pictures of her in full make-up where she still looks hideous in spite of it. That implies that something is wrong.

Anyway, is there anywhere that commercial is up for download?

Crown · Post by **Crown** » 2005-01-13 11:50am

Peregrin Toker wrote:Yeah, that probably applies to most of the people mentioned here... however, here, we have pictures of her in full make-up where she still looks hideous in spite of it. That implies that something is wrong.

Anyway, is there anywhere that commercial is up for download?

Sure, this is the one I know about; 43MB *right click save as. It's 2mins long, the pic quality is good, but the sound quality isn't too crash hot.

Z-Ha-Dum · Post by **Z-Ha-Dum** » 2005-01-13 12:47pm

Catherine Bell is still my favorite TV actress. My other favorites are Cate Blanchett, Amanda Tapping and Hunter Tylo.

Stormbringer · Post by **Stormbringer** » 2005-01-13 02:46pm

Peregrin Toker wrote:Can't you see the way plastic surgery has wrecked her totally? Chain smoking probably hasn't helped either...

<Snip>

She's certainly not the most beautiful actress around - Uma Thurman and Amanda Tapping are both roughly the same age as Ms. Kidman and much prettier.

My god, she's got a bad picture or two. Personally, aside from that first one she doesn't look bad, just normal for a woman her age. As for the last one, have some jackass jam a camera in your face and we'll see how well you photograph. I still think she's a fine looking woman.

And Amanada Tapping? She's another forgettable generic blonde. I suppose she's wankable for the Gate-boys but she's nothing special.

Uma Thurman, she's striking but I wouldn't call her beautiful.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2005-01-13 03:54pm

I can't believe I forgot Mary Tyler Moore, from her Dick Van Dyke Show days. I'd fuck her silly. She doesn't even look too bad now, considering her age. No longer fuckable, but she's in her 70s, so that's not a surprise.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2005-01-13 04:53pm

To elfdart: so you're one of those Internet geeks who dismissively puts down the appearance of women because they don't look exactly the same 10 to 15 years later, eh? Grow up. I'm sick of posing jackoffs on the Internet who have these incredibly lofty standards for womens' appearances. Everyone who deviates even slightly from your standard is immediately classified as a walking disaster

Stormbringer · Post by **Stormbringer** » 2005-01-13 05:24pm

Darth Wong wrote:To elfdart: so you're one of those Internet geeks who dismissively puts down the appearance of women because they don't look exactly the same 10 to 15 years later, eh? Grow up. I'm sick of posing jackoffs on the Internet who have these incredibly lofty standards for womens' appearances. Everyone who deviates even slightly from your standard is immediately classified as a walking disaster

Psst, don't you mean Peregrin Toker?

Elfdart · Post by **Elfdart** » 2005-01-13 09:20pm

Darth Wong wrote:To elfdart: so you're one of those Internet geeks who dismissively puts down the appearance of women because they don't look exactly the same 10 to 15 years later, eh? Grow up. I'm sick of posing jackoffs on the Internet who have these incredibly lofty standards for womens' appearances. Everyone who deviates even slightly from your standard is immediately classified as a walking disaster

Try reading what I wrote before flaming me in such a moronic manner. I said that even after losing weight, she still looked good. As I wrote before, I don't think it's aging. Monica Bellucci is several years older, for example. But Connelly did lose a lot of weight to the point where she was looking unhealthy and quite a few people thought she got a breast reduction operation. Her own publicist admitted she had lost a lot of weight and insisted she was putting some back on. So it's not just my opinion, but also the opinion of the interviewer for Vanity Fair. So I guess they're just "Internet geeks" and "posing jackoffs". You putz.

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2005-01-13 10:32pm

Well my top two are an odd pairing that many here probably haven't heard of. Topping the list is, and remains Josie Maran while number two has been, and will only be knocked off by Portman, Larisa Oleynik. Something about that little smile with her nose half crinkled up just defines cute.

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2005-01-13 10:34pm

Monica Bellucci. Mama mia!

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2005-01-13 11:18pm

Darth Wong wrote:To elfdart: so you're one of those Internet geeks who dismissively puts down the appearance of women because they don't look exactly the same 10 to 15 years later, eh? Grow up. I'm sick of posing jackoffs on the Internet who have these incredibly lofty standards for womens' appearances. Everyone who deviates even slightly from your standard is immediately classified as a walking disaster

Um, Mike, if you're referring to the Nicole Kidman discussion, that Peregrin Toker. If you're referring to Jennifer Connelly, I said virtually the exact same thing about her. She didn't just look thin, she seriously looked like she'd developed an eating disorder or was on cocaine. There's a difference between "she's thinner than I prefer; I liked her better before she lost the weight", which is where she is now that's she's gained some of it back, and "she looks like she has an intestinal parisite", which is where she was.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2005-01-13 11:21pm

Elfdart wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:To elfdart: so you're one of those Internet geeks who dismissively puts down the appearance of women because they don't look exactly the same 10 to 15 years later, eh? Grow up. I'm sick of posing jackoffs on the Internet who have these incredibly lofty standards for womens' appearances. Everyone who deviates even slightly from your standard is immediately classified as a walking disaster
Try reading what I wrote before flaming me in such a moronic manner. I said that even after losing weight, she still looked good. As I wrote before, I don't think it's aging. Monica Bellucci is several years older, for example. But Connelly did lose a lot of weight to the point where she was looking unhealthy and quite a few people thought she got a breast reduction operation. Her own publicist admitted she had lost a lot of weight and insisted she was putting some back on. So it's not just my opinion, but also the opinion of the interviewer for Vanity Fair. So I guess they're just "Internet geeks" and "posing jackoffs". You putz.

Oh wow, so people in the most superficial business in the world said she lost weight, and this validates your claim that you're not being over-critical? Puh-lease. Don't be a fucking idiot. Have you ever seen what people with real eating disorders look like?

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2005-01-13 11:21pm

Stormbringer wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:To elfdart: so you're one of those Internet geeks who dismissively puts down the appearance of women because they don't look exactly the same 10 to 15 years later, eh? Grow up. I'm sick of posing jackoffs on the Internet who have these incredibly lofty standards for womens' appearances. Everyone who deviates even slightly from your standard is immediately classified as a walking disaster
Psst, don't you mean Peregrin Toker?

Yes, but Elfdart is doing the same thing.

Post by **Vympel** » 2005-01-13 11:26pm

Nicole Kidman has had some pretty obvious plastic surgery. Compare her to how she looked in say, BMX Bandits (hahahahahahah!) to how she looks now. I think she looked her absolute best in Batman Forever. She still looks pretty now, but I prefer redheads.

Why's it called plastic surgery anyway?

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2005-01-13 11:31pm

Darth Wong wrote:Oh wow, so people in the most superficial business in the world said she lost weight, and this validates your claim that you're not being over-critical?

His critisism was fairly moderate. Not over the top, unlike you at the moment.

Puh-lease. Don't be a fucking idiot. Have you ever seen what people with real eating disorders look like?

Did he say she was comparable to a person with a real eating disorder? Even if he did, I'm sure it wasn't serious.

BoredShirtless · Post by **BoredShirtless** » 2005-01-13 11:34pm

Vympel wrote: Why's it called plastic surgery anyway?

Because in the olden days, they used plastic for titty implants.