Could a mod delete the above post?
Connor MacLeod wrote:It shouldn't matter much quantitatively since we're still talking in terms of either force, energy, or both (telepathic attacks aren't really quantifiable anyhow, except in terms of say how many people can be mind clouded, mind controled, mind blasted at any given instant.)
I was mainly thinking about it because 40K telepathic attacks tend to have a lot of feedback (when Ravenor and Kinsky were duelling telepathically in
Ravenor, they were tearing up chunks of the enviroment).
The momentum of such a round is somewhere between that of an MBT cannon and a battleship cannon, and materials science has allowed us to (a certain extent) protect against that (IIRC for example, the armor on Iowa-class battleships tended to be as thick as 30-40 cm in key places, so that might not be as good an indicator (certainly it would not seem to exceed the "order of magnitude" range I mentioned.)
Density figures (either stated or derived from known vechile dimensions and masses) might provide another hint at their "materials science"
True. I'll see what I can find there.
I seem to recall something about huundreds of gigatons worth of torpedoes or something being commonly cited.
Yep. Anti-space hulk torpedoes, 122 5GT submunitions per warhead. However their power relative to the standard torpedoes isn't stated AFAIK.
That said, there is some sort of WH40K site I have browsed from time to time that has various (presumably official) info.. and it includes stuff on capital ships and had a few examples of quantifible damage - creating craters "hundreds of meters deep", destroying cities, or reducing mountain ranges to rubble.. or some such..
Sounds about right.
Execution Hour has shots from several ships digging out craters hundreds of meters deep, and
Ghostmaker refers to the frigate
Navarre as being capable of incinerating cities. IIRC there's a mention of turning cities into "vast plains of radioactive glass" somewhere, and man-portable ordinance has produced blasts easily visible in high orbit (
Lone Wolves).
I also vaguely remember comparisons of energy outputs to stars on same site - although I'm not sure if that was hyperbole or not.
I'd put it in the same league as Hekate describing
Imperius Dictatio as capable of destroying planets, ie. overstatement.
Offhand guess.. maybe mid to high megajoule/gigajoule at least based on incineration.. terajoule probably. This is definitely some sort of projectile incendairy device (little evidence of a blast wave.. momentum of a terajoule-range energy burst would be dangerous to a person, and direct-fire weapons generally aren't as "extensive" in damage wise to completely melt a structure, unless we're talking a wide-beam effect.)
Meltas are flamethrowers, of a sort, however they seem to be closer to energy weapons than flamers. They can BTW be set to wide-beam (
Eye of Terror).
hypothetically assuming a structure oh, 20 meters square, ,and maybe 5 meters tall.. assuming the space is about 90% air (ie empty) and a composition of iron... about 2 terajoules to melt totally.
okay.
First And Only, page 126 wrote:The older man smiled at Gaunt. He began to say something.
The wall behind him exploded in a firestorm of light and vaporising bricks. Two fierce blue beams of las fire punched into the room and sliced the man into three distinct sections before he could move.
Necropolis, page 222 wrote:Tarrian was dead, his rib-cage blasted open like a burned-out ship's hull.
That's from a hellgun round. Slightly more powerful than a standard las, but not by orders of magnitude.
Necropolis, page 228 wrote:Trygg made a sound like a scalded cat and fell, severed at the waist.
Necropolis, page 139 wrote:Trooper Fanck dropped, his chest gone.
That last one might have been a boltround, not lasfire, since Corbec mentioned that his platoon was being hit with las and bolts.
"I do not say the French cannot come. I only say they cannot come by sea." - Admiral Lord St. Vincent, Royal Navy, during the Napoleonic Wars
"Show me a general who has made no mistakes and you speak of a general who has seldom waged war." - Marshal Turenne, 1641