Arnie Libel Case Continues.

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Keevan_Colton
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10355
Joined: 2002-12-30 08:57pm
Location: In the Land of Logic and Reason, two doors down from Lilliput and across the road from Atlantis...
Contact:

Arnie Libel Case Continues.

Post by Keevan_Colton »

An attempt to halt a libel action brought against Arnold Schwarzenegger by a TV presenter who alleges she was groped by him has failed.

Anna Richardson is suing the now California governor and two of his aides claiming they tried to ruin her reputation by dismissing her claims.

The actor's spokesman Sean Walsh argued for its dismissal, saying she had no chance of winning in a British court.

But the judge in the case said there was no way of knowing the outcome.

As Mr Schwarzenegger was campaigning to become governor in October 2003, Ms Richardson alleged he had touched her breast while she interviewed him during a movie promotion.

Tarnished reputation

She alleged that following her revelation, his spokespeople - Mr Walsh and Sheryl Main - libelled her in a Los Angeles Times article that also appeared on the internet.

Her libel action contended that Mr Schwarzenegger's staff had said she encouraged his behaviour. She said that tarnished her reputation as a professional interviewer.

Mr Walsh has previously made unsuccessful attempts to get the case thrown out, arguing that British courts had no jurisdiction.

His latest argument centred on the likelihood of the action failing.

But Lord Justice Swinton Thomas, sitting in the Court of Appeal, said there were no grounds to halt the case because it was not possible to predict whether it would fail.

Mr Schwarzenegger has previously apologised for behaviour that "offended people" following allegations from six woman who accused him of sexual harassment.
BBC
Arnold Schwarzenegger faces a highly embarrassing libel battle in the British courts over an alleged sex attack.

The Hollywood tough guy turned California governor could have his colourful private life subjected to intense scrutiny and faces potential legal costs in excess of £1million.

He could also have to pay hefty damages.

British TV presenter Anna Richardson, 32, is suing the 57-year-old Terminator star for libel after he claimed she falsely accused him of groping her in order to damage his political ambitions.

The case stems from an incident in December 2000 when she was interviewing him for an ITV entertainment programme in the Dorchester hotel in London.

Miss Richardson claimed he pulled her on to his knee and asked if her breasts were real, then circled her left nipple with his finger before telling her: "Yes, they are real."

At the time a spokesman for Schwarzenegger's film The Sixth Day laughed off the incident, saying: "Arnie is a big flirt, as is Anna. Most presenters know how to handle him and understand he's just flirting."

The allegation resurfaced when Schwarzenegger was running for office as governor of California and came days after he admitted taking a training course about steering clear of sexual harassment claims.

Spanking

His campaign was almost derailed by allegations that he had groped and molested 16 women. The claims ranged from grabbing a woman's breast in a gym in 1975 to spanking a woman in a Los Angeles sound studio 15 years later.

Miss Richardson's claim was refuted by Schwarzenegger's political campaign manager Sean Walsh in an article published in the Los Angeles Times in October 2003.

Mr Walsh claimed she had fabricated the allegation to hurt Schwarzenegger's election campaign.

The article was also published internationally on the Internet.

Miss Richardson, who had been working for the LWT show Big Screen, was furious and filed a libel suit against Schwarzenegger, Mr Walsh and the actor's publicist Sheryl Main at the High Court in London.

Vicar's daughter

Miss Richardson, a vicar's daughter, claims she has been libelled and that her reputation as a professional interviewer has been damaged.

If Schwarzenegger loses he could be ordered to pay damages to Miss Richardson running into hundreds of thousands of pounds.

Legal experts say no trial is likely before the end of the year - if the matter is not settled out of court first.

Opening skirmishes in the legal battle have seen Mr Walsh repeatedly try, and fail, to block the action.

Last year, he asked the High Court to halt the case in the English courts, claiming that - as the article was published in the US and Schwarzenegger and his team are all American - there was no case to answer in this country. The application was dismissed.

Yesterday, Richard Spearman, QC, for the defendants, asked for permission to appeal against the decision.

But the Court of Appeal said that as Miss Richardson is a British citizen and the alleged libel was published on the Internet, any libel trial should take place here.
Daily Mail
"Prodesse Non Nocere."
"It's all about popularity really, if your invisible friend that tells you to invade places is called Napoleon, you're a loony, if he's called Jesus then you're the president."
"I'd drive more people insane, but I'd have to double back and pick them up first..."
"All it takes for bullshit to thrive is for rational men to do nothing." - Kevin Farrell, B.A. Journalism.
BOTM - EBC - Horseman - G&C - Vampire
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10692
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Post by Elfdart »

I wonder if this will go to court before the Gropenfuhrer runs for re-election. I wish the US would adopt something similar to Britain's libel laws, where the burden of proof is on the party making the assertion to prove it.
User avatar
Lord Zentei
Space Elf Psyker
Posts: 8742
Joined: 2004-11-22 02:49am
Location: Ulthwé Craftworld, plotting the downfall of the Imperium.

Post by Lord Zentei »

Elfdart wrote:I wonder if this will go to court before the Gropenfuhrer runs for re-election. I wish the US would adopt something similar to Britain's libel laws, where the burden of proof is on the party making the assertion to prove it.
Indeed. Requiring someone to prove a negative in order to protect his/her reputation is pretty retarded.
CotK <mew> | HAB | JL | MM | TTC | Cybertron

TAX THE CHURCHES! - Lord Zentei TTC Supreme Grand Prophet

And the LORD said, Let there be Bosons! Yea and let there be Bosoms too!
I'd rather be the great great grandson of a demon ninja than some jackass who grew potatos. -- Covenant
Dead cows don't fart. -- CJvR
...and I like strudel! :mrgreen: -- Asuka
User avatar
frigidmagi
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2962
Joined: 2004-04-14 07:05pm
Location: A Nice Dry Place

Post by frigidmagi »

It won't be changed anytime soon because the powers that be find it a great weapon against people they can't beat any other way.
Image
Post Reply