What do you rate Trek Weapons at?

SWvST: the subject of the main site.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

What do you rate Trek Weapons at?

Post by Ender »

I put together a list of all the weapons in Trek that I could find, and want to know what you rate them at. Afterall, we have the Warsie stuff up top, but no trekkie stuff.

Species 8472 Superweapon
Species 8472 Beam Cannon
Borg Cutting Laser
Borg Plasma Torpedo
Borg Disruptor
Tri-Cobalt Torpedo
Croniton Torpedo
Phaser Array, type 12
Phaser Array, type 11+
Phaser Array, type 11
Phaser Array, type 10
Phaser Array, type 9
Phaser Array, type 8
Phaser Array, type 7
Phaser Array, type 6
Phaser Array, type 5
Quantum Torpedo
Photon Torpedo, type 6
Photon Torpedo, type 5 (standard torpedo)
Heavy Disruptor Cannon
Disruptor Cannon
Romulan Plasma Torpedo
Cardassian Spiral Wave Disruptor
Breen Energy Drain Weapon
Microtorpedo
Phase Cannon
Phased Polaron Cannon
Transphasic Torpedo
Cardassian Dreadnaught
Subspace Torpedo
Graviton Torpedo

I'll post my list later
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

I'm kinda shocked that this got no replies. THe ones on the main site are feddie weapons only, plus I know not everyone here agrees with them.

Here's mine.

Borg Plasma Torpedo
200 Megatons

Phaser Array, type 12
24 terrawatts (40 MT due to NDF)

Phaser Array, type 11+
16.2 terrawatts (27 MT due to NDF)

Phaser Array, type 11
12 terrawatts (20 MT due to NDF)

Phaser Array, type 10
6 terrawatts (10 MT due to NDF)

Phaser Array, type 9
2 terrawatts (5 MT due to NDF)

Phaser Array, type 8
1.5 terrawatts (2.5 MT due to NDF)

Phaser Array, type 7
750 gigawatts (1.25 MT due to NDF)

Phaser Array, type 6
375 gigawatts (625 KT due to NDF)

Phaser Array, type 5
187.5 megawatts (312.5 KT due to NDF)

Quantum Torpedo
150 Megatons

Photon Torpedo, type 6
55.5 Megatons

Photon Torpedo, type 5 (standard torpedo)
50 Megatons

Heavy Disruptor Cannon
Comparable to a type 12 at least

Disruptor Cannon
Comparable to a type 10 at least

Romulan Plasma Torpedo
1 Gigaton

Cardassian Spiral Wave Disruptor
Comparable to a type 10

Microtorpedo
10 Megatons

Phase Cannon
500 Gigajoules

Phased Polaron Cannon
Comparable to a type 10 on the larger ships

All the rest I have no clue about
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Cpt_Frank
Official SD.Net Evil Warsie Asshole
Posts: 3652
Joined: 2002-07-03 03:05am
Location: the black void
Contact:

Post by Cpt_Frank »

Hmm transphasic torpedoes....
I'd say they're no more than a standard pho-to, possibly even weaker because they have to carry this transphasic thingy which allows them to match frequenceies to penetrate the shields or something like that...
I'd give him 50 megatons.
HOWEVER the weapons are omnidirectional so that means 50% can possibly be effective.
effective yield:
Borg plasma torp:
100 mt
Quantum torp
64 mt
Photon torp type vi
40 mt
Photon torp type v
32 mt

my estimates.
Image
Supermod
User avatar
Exonerate
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4454
Joined: 2002-10-29 07:19pm
Location: DC Metro Area

Post by Exonerate »

Ender wrote:I'm kinda shocked that this got no replies. THe ones on the main site are feddie weapons only, plus I know not everyone here agrees with them.

Here's mine.


Microtorpedo
10 Megatons

All the rest I have no clue about
Might as well use a big nuke... :roll:

BoTM, MM, HAB, JL
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

FYI the Mark-6 torpedo is rated at 8 times more powerful then the Mark-5 torpedo. I find it highly unlikely that it would turn out to be less then 20% stronger as the two listed opinions.

Mark5: 25 Isoton (ST unit, not real unit) "DS9 TM"
Q-Torp: 50 Isoton "DS9 TM"
Mark 6: 200 Isoton "VGR Scorpion"
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Cpt_Frank wrote:Hmm transphasic torpedoes....
I'd say they're no more than a standard pho-to, possibly even weaker because they have to carry this transphasic thingy which allows them to match frequenceies to penetrate the shields or something like that...
I'd give him 50 megatons.
The Mark-5 is less then 10 years younger then the Mark-6 yet there is an 8 fold increase in firepower. The Transphasic torpedo is 15 years more advanced then the Mark-6 torpedo, an increase in firepower is extremely likely and its even possible it uses advanced Quantum Torpedo systems for the explossive power.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Alyeska wrote:FYI the Mark-6 torpedo is rated at 8 times more powerful then the Mark-5 torpedo. I find it highly unlikely that it would turn out to be less then 20% stronger as the two listed opinions.

Mark5: 25 Isoton (ST unit, not real unit) "DS9 TM"
Q-Torp: 50 Isoton "DS9 TM"
Mark 6: 200 Isoton "VGR Scorpion"
I thought TNG: Genesis said there was only an 11% increase, hence my numbers
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Exonerate wrote:
Ender wrote:I'm kinda shocked that this got no replies. THe ones on the main site are feddie weapons only, plus I know not everyone here agrees with them.

Here's mine.


Microtorpedo
10 Megatons

All the rest I have no clue about
Might as well use a big nuke... :roll:
Doubt you could build a six inch long 10 megaton nuke.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

Exonerate wrote:
Ender wrote:I'm kinda shocked that this got no replies. THe ones on the main site are feddie weapons only, plus I know not everyone here agrees with them.

Here's mine.


Microtorpedo
10 Megatons

All the rest I have no clue about
Might as well use a big nuke... :roll:
You have no comprehension of just how big a multimegaton nuke is IRL, do you?
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

Exonerate wrote:
Ender wrote:I'm kinda shocked that this got no replies. THe ones on the main site are feddie weapons only, plus I know not everyone here agrees with them.

Here's mine.


Microtorpedo
10 Megatons

All the rest I have no clue about
Might as well use a big nuke... :roll:
Guys, he clearly rolled his eyes. I think he was being sarcastic.

Just to set the record straight, though, our nuclear weapons do not approach that yield.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Anarchist Bunny
Foul, Cruel, and Bad-Tempered Rodent
Posts: 5458
Joined: 2002-07-12 02:08am
Contact:

Post by Anarchist Bunny »

Alyeska wrote:
Cpt_Frank wrote:Hmm transphasic torpedoes....
I'd say they're no more than a standard pho-to, possibly even weaker because they have to carry this transphasic thingy which allows them to match frequenceies to penetrate the shields or something like that...
I'd give him 50 megatons.
The Mark-5 is less then 10 years younger then the Mark-6 yet there is an 8 fold increase in firepower. The Transphasic torpedo is 15 years more advanced then the Mark-6 torpedo, an increase in firepower is extremely likely and its even possible it uses advanced Quantum Torpedo systems for the explossive power.
Yes but the Transphasic Torp was designed on Voyager on their way home. I don't believe that a torp designed on a spaceship would have the same rate of advancement as research stations.
//This Line Blank as of 7/15/07\\
Ornithology Subdirector: SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences
Wiilite
Image
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Post by Ender »

Master of Ossus wrote:Just to set the record straight, though, our nuclear weapons do not approach that yield.
Tsar Nova test cracked in at 50 MT according to my Aug. copy of Popular Science.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Darth PhysBod
Youngling
Posts: 129
Joined: 2002-08-09 06:23am
Location: U.K

Post by Darth PhysBod »

I dont think the basic torpedo is in the MT range.

I you go by TNG Genesis (the live fire test of the new torpedos), well they barely shattered (i.e broke into several slow moving pieces) a pair of asteroids; one ~13mx8m, the other 15mx14m (scaling from torpedo's at impact).

Thats implies a rather insignificant yield (and they were 11% increased explosive yield over their previous torpedos).
User avatar
Grand Admiral Thrawn
Ruthless Imperial Tyrant
Posts: 5755
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:11pm
Location: Canada

Post by Grand Admiral Thrawn »

highest nuke-50 megatons. ONE. Multiple smaller nukes are better.
"You know, I was God once."
"Yes, I saw. You were doing well, until everyone died."
Bender and God, Futurama
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

Ender wrote:
Master of Ossus wrote:Just to set the record straight, though, our nuclear weapons do not approach that yield.
Tsar Nova test cracked in at 50 MT according to my Aug. copy of Popular Science.
Such a bomb would be hugely impractical in any military use.

The majority of the U.S. nuclear arsenal is less than one megaton.
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

anarchistbunny wrote:
Alyeska wrote:
Cpt_Frank wrote:Hmm transphasic torpedoes....
I'd say they're no more than a standard pho-to, possibly even weaker because they have to carry this transphasic thingy which allows them to match frequenceies to penetrate the shields or something like that...
I'd give him 50 megatons.
The Mark-5 is less then 10 years younger then the Mark-6 yet there is an 8 fold increase in firepower. The Transphasic torpedo is 15 years more advanced then the Mark-6 torpedo, an increase in firepower is extremely likely and its even possible it uses advanced Quantum Torpedo systems for the explossive power.
Yes but the Transphasic Torp was designed on Voyager on their way home. I don't believe that a torp designed on a spaceship would have the same rate of advancement as research stations.
I haven't seen the episode but IIRC Janeway from the future brought the technology to the "present" Voyager.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Uraniun235 wrote:
Ender wrote:
Master of Ossus wrote:Just to set the record straight, though, our nuclear weapons do not approach that yield.
Tsar Nova test cracked in at 50 MT according to my Aug. copy of Popular Science.
Such a bomb would be hugely impractical in any military use.

The majority of the U.S. nuclear arsenal is less than one megaton.
Tsar Bomba was a supposedly approx. 100 MT weapon who's outer uranium jacket was replaced with lead to control the yield. I believe the Servenaya test yielded around 50 MTs or around that. It was never intended for military use: the only bomber that could carry it would only perhaps reach the only practical American target, Chicago, in 8 hours, which is needless to say, too long in a nuclear war. If dropped in Europe, the lethal fallout would be so prodigious it'd likely blow over Warsaw Pact nations.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
Post Reply