Jedi Knight: Should we invite him here?

Post by **fgalkin** » 2002-11-13 06:29pm

Jedi Knight is the stupidest being in the JREF forums. An example of his cretinism is in my sig. More can be found in the extreme stupidity thread.

Now, here's the question: should we invite him here and collectively assault him? Or should we save our sanity and leave him be?

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Post by **Coyote** » 2002-11-13 06:42pm

I actually haven't voted yet. I don't know. I doubt anything productive would be accomplished; he's really just interested in hollering accusations at atheists for being evil. As much as an atheist or agnostic will accuse him of being mindless, he'll just reflect that all right back about atheism. Even Lord Wong wouldn't be able to get anything resembling interaction, since JK just won't play ball.

If we could get him actually discussing and debating, he'd be a tough one. But in the end I think he'd just get tired of it all, declare 'victory' and leave the board, telling everyone else he met what a bunch of 'atheist kooks' exist here.

--Course, could be good for recruitment.

I might be able to get ahold of him, if you want. I was hoping to get him talking to me, since he seemed to be interesting.

Post by **fgalkin** » 2002-11-13 06:48pm

Well, it should be fun.

And these boards will know yet another troll, but this one more stupid than all the rest combined.

He would leave pearls of wisdom for our collection.

And imagine if we get him to be involved in a SW debate.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Post by **Kuja** » 2002-11-13 07:01pm

NO! We've had enough trolls to bang our heads against recently NO MORE.

Post by **haas mark** » 2002-11-13 07:02pm

PLEASE no more!!!!! We have enough about this with CATW ALONE!

Wicked Pilot · Post by **Wicked Pilot** » 2002-11-13 07:02pm

He's nothing more than a spammer. He'll just come on here and start a thread like "Why do athiest hate God?" or "Prove F=Gm1m2/r^2".

He's like a monkey that slings shit all over the place. He may be fun to laugh at from afar, but you wouldn't want him in your living room.

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2002-11-13 07:41pm

I say one of us challenges him to a debate, instead of inviting him over here.

Post by **fgalkin** » 2002-11-13 07:59pm

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:I say one of us challenges him to a debate, instead of inviting him over here.

He will say he doesn't debate with communist newbies.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Post by **Kuja** » 2002-11-13 08:03pm

Still an emphatic NO.

Post by **haas mark** » 2002-11-13 08:05pm

There something we don't understand about 'no'?

data_link · Post by **data_link** » 2002-11-13 09:11pm

Invite him here. Though he will be a difficult opponent, never let it be said that SD.net has ever shrank from our holy task of driving out the forces of stupidity. Besides, while his inability to comprehend basic physics is astounding, the actual strength of his IWoI is a mere .3 RSA, so we should be able to handle him.

Post by **weemadando** » 2002-11-13 09:45pm

I say no, for the time being. Feel free to go and fight him, but we have to finish CW.org first.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2002-11-13 09:55pm

He is not interested in debate. He argues like a small child, by simply saying "I'm right and you're wrong!" in a hundred different ways.

All he would do is lower the S/N ratio. He has accomplished the remarkable feat of being an idiot even by fundie standards.

Joe · Post by **Joe** » 2002-11-13 09:57pm

Aw, come on, invite him, it was so much fun to read jodathalas's whiny posts that I wouldn't mind having another person like him here.

SAMAS · Post by **SAMAS** » 2002-11-14 08:40am

Well, in case of a debate(or heaven believe, we invite him), here's a pic that should come in use should you decide to group-stomp him:

http://samas.freehosting.net/Concession.jpg

EmperorMing · Post by **EmperorMing** » 2002-11-14 09:08am

I say no. This board does have *some*

standards...

Kosh_The_Vorlon · Post by **Kosh_The_Vorlon** » 2002-11-14 09:45am

EmperorMing wrote:I say no. This board does have *some* standards...

It does?? Where??

::looks under the sofa::

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2002-11-14 04:20pm

fgalkin wrote:
Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:I say one of us challenges him to a debate, instead of inviting him over here.
He will say he doesn't debate with communist newbies.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

If he sys that, tell him he's being a coward for not debating. But then, he'll be immature, stick his head in his ass again, and cower behind his wall of ignorance.

Post by **Coyote** » 2002-11-14 06:09pm

It's beginning to look like a big fat "Negatory" on the Jedi Knight question. I kinda agree; he doesn't really debate. It's admirable to say that we never back down from a challenge, but a "challenge" is rational and constructive. This would not be-- it would be a food fight and little more.

I feel like I am not exaggerating when I say that any one of us would rather spend a week in a pup tent with CreationistAllTheWay than 24 hours in a give-and-take with JK through the computer. It can be that frustrating. And his lapdog-shadow Franko is about the same.

data_link · Post by **data_link** » 2002-11-14 06:15pm

Coyote wrote:It's beginning to look like a big fat "Negatory" on the Jedi Knight question. I kinda agree; he doesn't really debate. It's admirable to say that we never back down from a challenge, but a "challenge" is rational and constructive. This would not be-- it would be a food fight and little more.

I feel like I am not exaggerating when I say that any one of us would rather spend a week in a pup tent with CreationistAllTheWay than 24 hours in a give-and-take with JK through the computer. It can be that frustrating. And his lapdog-shadow Franko is about the same.

I don't know - a week in a tent with CATW - I think the tent would smell pretty bad at the end of it. You know how rotting flesh is.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2002-11-14 06:22pm

Darth Wong wrote:He has accomplished the remarkable feat of being an idiot even by fundie standards.

Is it possible to have a negative IQ score?

data_link · Post by **data_link** » 2002-11-14 06:27pm

Darth Servo wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:He has accomplished the remarkable feat of being an idiot even by fundie standards.
Is it possible to have a negative IQ score?

His IQ is the square root of a negative number.

Post by **fgalkin** » 2002-11-14 07:08pm

Coyote wrote:It's beginning to look like a big fat "Negatory" on the Jedi Knight question. I kinda agree; he doesn't really debate. It's admirable to say that we never back down from a challenge, but a "challenge" is rational and constructive. This would not be-- it would be a food fight and little more.

I feel like I am not exaggerating when I say that any one of us would rather spend a week in a pup tent with CreationistAllTheWay than 24 hours in a give-and-take with JK through the computer. It can be that frustrating. And his lapdog-shadow Franko is about the same.

Well, I've spent a grand total of 12 hours debating that moron, and I have noticed that I am slowly becoming insane. And I always thought that I had a particularly high stupidity tolerance level.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

Hotfoot · Post by **Hotfoot** » 2002-11-14 08:17pm

fgalkin wrote:Well, I've spent a grand total of 12 hours debating that moron, and I have noticed that I am slowly becoming insane. And I always thought that I had a particularly high stupidity tolerance level.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin

I warned you, didn't I?

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Jedi Knight: Should we invite him here?

Should we invite JK here?

Jedi Knight: Should we invite him here?