We're almost in range.
Moderator: Vympel
-
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm
The only possible reason I could think is that maybe at the time Han couldn't control his quad guns from the cockpit, so he was getting closer to use the blasters on the mandibles? I dunno...how did he blast Vader?
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
- The Silence and I
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: 2002-11-09 09:04pm
- Location: Bleh!
As I recall he was in the gun turret when he blasted Vader, I remember him wearing a head set.
"Do not worry, I have prepared something for just such an emergency."
"You're prepared for a giant monster made entirely of nulls stomping around Mainframe?!"
"That is correct!"
"How do you plan for that?"
"Uh... lucky guess?"
"You're prepared for a giant monster made entirely of nulls stomping around Mainframe?!"
"That is correct!"
"How do you plan for that?"
"Uh... lucky guess?"
- Connor MacLeod
- Sith Apprentice
- Posts: 14065
- Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
- Contact:
some official sources (SWTJ, EGV&V) indicated that controlling the Falcon's guns from the cockpit was possible, but with reduced accuracy.
According to "Tyrant's test" the falcon's guns were "mostly" manually controlled (there wasn't much computer assistance I think) - but the radio drama makes mention of going for a "sensor gun lock" on the TIE it pursued.
According to "Tyrant's test" the falcon's guns were "mostly" manually controlled (there wasn't much computer assistance I think) - but the radio drama makes mention of going for a "sensor gun lock" on the TIE it pursued.
-
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm
(Shrugs.) Eh, nothing can really make much sense given the ridiculously low range, except perhaps that zoom magnification explanation. If that's the case, then the TIE Fighter could have been much further away than what we saw from the cockpit. Only problem being that you see outside shots of the TIE Fighter really close right before you see that cockpit shot.
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Re: We're almost in range.
How do you even know he has those cannons or concussion missiles at the time? He can't even afford to pay Jabba the money he owes him on pain of death, for fuck's sake. How's he going to be able to afford military ordnance for his ship?IRG CommandoJoe wrote:I was just watching my ANH DVD. I watched the scene where the Millenium Falcon was following the TIE Fighter leading them to the Death Star. Then there was a part where Han said, "we're almost in range." The shot was from the cockpit's POV, and you see the TIE Fighter right in front of the ship. Almost in range for what? A tractor beam? What the hell is Han talking about? Clearly the laser cannons or concussion missiles could have handled it from that range. So what else could he possibly be referring to?
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Nope. He was in the cockpit. There are headsets in the cockpit as well. You can see them hanging next to Han and Chewie, and Chewie even wears one in a production photo. By TESB, Han got rid of them.The Silence and I wrote:As I recall he was in the gun turret when he blasted Vader, I remember him wearing a head set.
Re: We're almost in range.
I think that he means the same laser cannons that they use later to blast several TIEs out of the sky when leaving the Death Star. Also, I don't know how Solo did get them, but the OT ICS shows concussion missiles (blue ovoids, IIRC) in the Millenium Falcon during the trip to Alderaan and, thus, pre-refit by Rebel technicians.Darth Wong wrote:How do you even know he has those cannons or concussion missiles at the time? He can't even afford to pay Jabba the money he owes him on pain of death, for fuck's sake. How's he going to be able to afford military ordnance for his ship?
Well, it seems clear from a visual standpoint that the Falcon got some kind of upgrades in between ANH and ROTJ, seeing as Lando was blasting several fighters at a similar distance in the matter of seconds.
Then there´s the case of hitting Vader´s escorts during the trench run. This would have been somewhat easier, as they were not moving away from the Falcon as it approached the Death Star, but sideways. (Like in a shooting gallery. )
Then there´s the case of hitting Vader´s escorts during the trench run. This would have been somewhat easier, as they were not moving away from the Falcon as it approached the Death Star, but sideways. (Like in a shooting gallery. )
So, the Empire routinely assumes all YT-1300 freighters, who are actively chasing them and acting in a semi-hostile manner are unarmed and unshielded?Cal Wright wrote:The TIE zoomed right past the Falcon which had just came out of lightspeed. Needless to say they were all stunned that Alderaan wasn't there. The TIE was getting thier attention and was obviously baiting them in for the DSs' tractor beam, which they were caught in. Why didn't Han shoot sooner? Because, there's no point in showing your hand, especially if your a fucking gambler, early. Since he was CATCHING the TIE, he was just biding time. Why wasted energy and shots only to allow your prey to know you have teeth that can easily tear you to shreds?
Let him land on any Lyran world to taste firsthand the wrath of peace loving people thwarted by the myopic greed of a few miserly old farts- Katrina Steiner
Re: We're almost in range.
Those could have been put in during ROTJ. THe OT:ICS doesn't just cover ANH.Murazor wrote:Also, I don't know how Solo did get them, but the OT ICS shows concussion missiles (blue ovoids, IIRC) in the Millenium Falcon during the trip to Alderaan and, thus, pre-refit by Rebel technicians.
There's several changes to the Falcon between ANH and TESB. Han upgraded his ship instead of paying off Jabba! He installed two more forward landing gear, two control yokes in the cockpit, changed the "biofilters" in the corridors, and installed a new, faster navicomputer.VT-16 wrote:Well, it seems clear from a visual standpoint that the Falcon got some kind of upgrades in between ANH and ROTJ, seeing as Lando was blasting several fighters at a similar distance in the matter of seconds.
For ROTJ, the Falcon also has two forward blaster cannons that fire from the same opening as the concussion missiles.
- The Silence and I
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: 2002-11-09 09:04pm
- Location: Bleh!
I would find that unlikely; while escaping they worked fine with no maintainence between.observer_20000 wrote:Perhaps the weapons were having some sort of malfunction at the time? It may seem a bit unlikely, but keep in mind that this is Millennium Falcon that always seems to have some sort of problem at the most inconvenient time possible.
I stand corrected. Do we know if Chewie was gunning? If not then this does not make things better, as it gives high accuracy to the guns while controlled from the cockpit.Nope. He was in the cockpit. There are headsets in the cockpit as well. You can see them hanging next to Han and Chewie, and Chewie even wears one in a production photo. By TESB, Han got rid of them.
"Do not worry, I have prepared something for just such an emergency."
"You're prepared for a giant monster made entirely of nulls stomping around Mainframe?!"
"That is correct!"
"How do you plan for that?"
"Uh... lucky guess?"
"You're prepared for a giant monster made entirely of nulls stomping around Mainframe?!"
"That is correct!"
"How do you plan for that?"
"Uh... lucky guess?"
Keep in mind everyone, the Falcon's guns weren't manned. Maybe any other laser-type weapons the Falcon has were short-range.
I know the Falcon has Concussion Missiles, but at the time on ANH she may not have been carrying any for whatever reason.
I know the Falcon has Concussion Missiles, but at the time on ANH she may not have been carrying any for whatever reason.
-A.L.
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence...Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'press on' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race." - Calvin Coolidge
"If you're falling off a cliff you may as well try to fly, you've got nothing to lose." - John Sheridan (Babylon 5)
"Sometimes you got to roll the hard six." - William Adama (Battlestar Galactica)
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence...Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'press on' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race." - Calvin Coolidge
"If you're falling off a cliff you may as well try to fly, you've got nothing to lose." - John Sheridan (Babylon 5)
"Sometimes you got to roll the hard six." - William Adama (Battlestar Galactica)
- The Silence and I
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: 2002-11-09 09:04pm
- Location: Bleh!
Yes, but if Chewie was not gunning when the Falcon saved Luke's rear end from Vader in ANH then accurate ranged targetting is very possible from the cockpit.
If Chewie was gunning then the point stands. I kind of hope he was, Han still should have taken the shot, but if the cockpit was that suitable a weapons control center then the scene just becomes sad (well, more sad).
In addition, AFAIK all the Falcon had in ANH was the turrets, maybe missiles, and maybe the repeating blaster, which cannot take on a fighter anyway.
If Chewie was gunning then the point stands. I kind of hope he was, Han still should have taken the shot, but if the cockpit was that suitable a weapons control center then the scene just becomes sad (well, more sad).
In addition, AFAIK all the Falcon had in ANH was the turrets, maybe missiles, and maybe the repeating blaster, which cannot take on a fighter anyway.
"Do not worry, I have prepared something for just such an emergency."
"You're prepared for a giant monster made entirely of nulls stomping around Mainframe?!"
"That is correct!"
"How do you plan for that?"
"Uh... lucky guess?"
"You're prepared for a giant monster made entirely of nulls stomping around Mainframe?!"
"That is correct!"
"How do you plan for that?"
"Uh... lucky guess?"
- The Silence and I
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1658
- Joined: 2002-11-09 09:04pm
- Location: Bleh!
I just watched the scenes in question, and Chewie is in the cockpit with Han. So the turret was controlled accurately from the cockpit.
While watching the 'almost in range' scene I noticed Ben could tell the fighter was out of range simply by looking out the window: "You may as well let it go, it's too far out of range" or words to that effect, to which Han said "Not for long!" So what gives? Was the fighter simply to far away to hit with the kind of weapons typically carried by frieghter/fighter sized vessels? Do weapons with those yields (or something inherent to those class of weapon) break down after only a few hundred meters? It is not like the fighter was maneuvering (it was not) so pure range is all that we know is involved. The only one jamming is the Falcon, and I have never heard of star wars jamming blinding both sides (besides, the fighter was RIGHT THERE).
That scene is bugging me now.
While watching the 'almost in range' scene I noticed Ben could tell the fighter was out of range simply by looking out the window: "You may as well let it go, it's too far out of range" or words to that effect, to which Han said "Not for long!" So what gives? Was the fighter simply to far away to hit with the kind of weapons typically carried by frieghter/fighter sized vessels? Do weapons with those yields (or something inherent to those class of weapon) break down after only a few hundred meters? It is not like the fighter was maneuvering (it was not) so pure range is all that we know is involved. The only one jamming is the Falcon, and I have never heard of star wars jamming blinding both sides (besides, the fighter was RIGHT THERE).
That scene is bugging me now.
"Do not worry, I have prepared something for just such an emergency."
"You're prepared for a giant monster made entirely of nulls stomping around Mainframe?!"
"That is correct!"
"How do you plan for that?"
"Uh... lucky guess?"
"You're prepared for a giant monster made entirely of nulls stomping around Mainframe?!"
"That is correct!"
"How do you plan for that?"
"Uh... lucky guess?"
Nope. The Falcon was much farther away when it hit Vader's wingman.The Silence and I wrote:Was the fighter simply to far away to hit with the kind of weapons typically carried by frieghter/fighter sized vessels?
Nope, for the same reason as above.Do weapons with those yields (or something inherent to those class of weapon) break down after only a few hundred meters?
From the radio drama, its clear Han was going to shoot. As I said before, he may have wanted it vaporized instead of blown apart, so there would be no trace of it that could lead back to his ship. No black box, nothing.It is not like the fighter was maneuvering (it was not) so pure range is all that we know is involved. The only one jamming is the Falcon, and I have never heard of star wars jamming blinding both sides (besides, the fighter was RIGHT THERE).
-
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm
Is it even possible to vaporize a TIE Fighter with laser cannons? AFAIK, you can only make it explode or blast it into pieces. I've never seen it vaporize before, at least not from laser cannons.
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
Sure. Compare the TIE explosion in the trench to the ones where the Falcon fights off 4 ties after they escape the Death Star.IRG CommandoJoe wrote:Is it even possible to vaporize a TIE Fighter with laser cannons? AFAIK, you can only make it explode or blast it into pieces. I've never seen it vaporize before, at least not from laser cannons.
Wait a minute... If Han didn't take the MF through the shield wouldn't that mean the lasers penetrated the DS's shields?Lord Poe wrote:BTW, here's my old page resurrected from the dead:
http://filmgate.h4h.com/louis/falconrange.html
-
- Sith Devotee
- Posts: 3481
- Joined: 2002-07-09 12:51pm
If exploding the TIE Fighters into large balls of dust is considered to be vaporizing them, then yes you are right, they were vaporized when escaping the Death Star. But I noticed that they vaporized them at greater ranges than the TIE Fighter was at when it was leading them towards the Death Star. And those vaporizations were only done by one quad cannon. Han was at a closer range, had two quad cannons to control, and the TIE Fighter was flying straight and wasn't even greatly accelerating. If he fired, he definitely would have vaporized the TIE Fighter. So ensuring that he would vaporize it can't be the reason why he wanted to get even closer than what he was.
Who's the more foolish, the fool or the fool who follows him? -Obi-Wan Kenobi
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
"In the unlikely event that someone comes here, hates everything we stand for, and then donates a big chunk of money anyway, I will thank him for his stupidity." -Darth Wong, Lord of the Sith
Proud member of the Brotherhood of the Monkey.
No...you can see debris from the TIEs that were shot down by the Falcon during the DS escape. The vape I'm talking about is Vader's wingman.IRG CommandoJoe wrote:If exploding the TIE Fighters into large balls of dust is considered to be vaporizing them, then yes you are right, they were vaporized when escaping the Death Star.
As I pointed out in the webpage, he may have been using the concealed blaster cannon, which seems easier to control from the cockpit.Han was at a closer range, had two quad cannons to control, and the TIE Fighter was flying straight and wasn't even greatly accelerating. If he fired, he definitely would have vaporized the TIE Fighter. So ensuring that he would vaporize it can't be the reason why he wanted to get even closer than what he was.