SW still has such primitive tech?

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

Darwin wrote:And 3P0 has to interact with humans on a regular basis. The smooth movement of battledroids could be considered 'creepy'. People who deal with droids a lot want droids to look and act like droids. There's a whole branch of psychology that deals with stuff like this.. how C3P0 is fine, but the droids in "I, Robot" were kind of freaky, because they looked more human, close enough to set off our wiggins about the bits that weren't.
Not to be so frank, but thinking like that's the stupid way around. It doesn't make any sense from an actual standpoint and looks more like random guessing.

No offence, it's just that nonsense like random guessing has always annoyed me in debates and discussions.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
Sriad
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3028
Joined: 2002-12-02 09:59pm
Location: Colorado

Post by Sriad »

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:
Darwin wrote:And 3P0 has to interact with humans on a regular basis. The smooth movement of battledroids could be considered 'creepy'. People who deal with droids a lot want droids to look and act like droids. There's a whole branch of psychology that deals with stuff like this.. how C3P0 is fine, but the droids in "I, Robot" were kind of freaky, because they looked more human, close enough to set off our wiggins about the bits that weren't.
Not to be so frank, but thinking like that's the stupid way around. It doesn't make any sense from an actual standpoint and looks more like random guessing.

No offence, it's just that nonsense like random guessing has always annoyed me in debates and discussions.
No, he's right. Google up "uncanny valley." This is almost certainly an instance where explaination follows on screen evidence instead of leading to it, but it makes complete sense. IRL C-3P0 moves around funny because they had to fit Anthony Daniels into a robot suit, but going by the SD.net philosophy there's an in universe reason why he's moved that way for decades without being fixed.

Keeping androids designed for diplomatic interactions harmless looking is a far better explaination than "no one ever got around to fixing it."
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

Sorry, its just the approach that strikes me as making shit up and dartboard guessing rather than actually thinking.

EDIT: Either that or thinking too hard.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

Did you know that screen tests of the new CGI Yoda revealed that they should make him less realistic? People actually preferred a slightly less realistic Yoda, because they didn't want his movements to look too human. He had to look slightly puppetlike.

Translate this kind of preference to Star Wars and you can imagine that (especially in a universe where some people dislike droids) they would make a point of not letting droids move in an overly human-like fashion.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

I thought it was more along that they occasionally deviated from the more accurate physical renderings of Yoda's clothes to make it look better ("Hollywood physics"), such making his robes billow out as he descended rather than more accurately shooting straight up.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
avoidingthepo
Youngling
Posts: 50
Joined: 2005-02-16 12:37pm
Location: jersey shore
Contact:

Post by avoidingthepo »

but if they didnt want robots to be too human-like why not make them shaped like an r2 or r5 unit?


i think its just because he was thrown together from scrap, has been neglected since he stopped being anakin's, and has sand in his joints.
=NUB=

Deceived by the devils decisions, forced into a slave
Death before dishonour for those men who were brave
Shot and sent to their grave, can't awaken, it's too late
Everything's been taken, I'm shaken, family, history, the making
User avatar
NRS Guardian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 531
Joined: 2004-09-11 09:11pm
Location: Colorado

Post by NRS Guardian »

unbeataBULL wrote:
Actually, infantry are used to take and hold any sort of ground, not just cities, in fact that is the primary purpose of any military ground force, that hasn't changed in at least 6,000 years. Also, horses and mules are still being used today by the U.S. army, because: they can go where trucks can't, are cheap, and you don't have to worry about gas or vehicle maintenance or oil. While on the subject of military advancement your basic grunt 3,000 years ago and the grunt of today still carry pretty much the same weight of gear, though not neccessarily the same gear.
um, don't they use tanks to take and hold ground? infantry can be bombed from the air and from the ground with out effective retaliation. infantry always needs the support of some kind of anti-aircraft mechanism, i.e. laser targetting, sonar, etc.
a rocket launcher alone won't have that kind of equipment.

tanks have the advantage of greater mobility, greater protection, and greater firepower. aircraft have extreme speed and great fire power.

IMHO, WWII was the end of the infantry era. once bombing and tanks became common, infantry were just needed to secure the area.

of course the whole war of 'Nam was about securing areas, so that didn't help much :roll:

and you have to admit that they don't commonly use pack animals in the military (which was my point). how often do you see a guy on horse-back in the battle field?
Actually, tanks need the support of infantry more than infantry need the support of tanks, especially when an infantry man can just dig in or hide and the tank can't get him or use improvised explosives to destroy the tank ala sticky bombs, IEDs, and the Molotov cocktail, or the good old fasshioned grenade down the hatch. Aircraft may be able to kill infantry out in the open or bust a bunker but they can never take and hold ground or defeat infantry all on their own, as can be seen in WWII, Kosovo, Afganhistan, Iraq 1 and 2, and Vietnam.
"It is not necessary to hope in order to persevere."
-William of Nassau, Prince of Orange

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.10
User avatar
NRS Guardian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 531
Joined: 2004-09-11 09:11pm
Location: Colorado

Post by NRS Guardian »

avoidingthepo wrote:but if they didnt want robots to be too human-like why not make them shaped like an r2 or r5 unit?


i think its just because he was thrown together from scrap, has been neglected since he stopped being anakin's, and has sand in his joints.
3po isn't a mechanic he's an interpreter and diplomatic aid, he's probably supposed to be anthropomorphic enough to be relatively unobtrusive and to help facilitate interaction with humans but not so human-like so as to be creepy. Also, in ANH he's on a princess's diplomatic vessel sand-free in the service of the head of Alderaan's government, yet he still walks stiffly. What about the stiff movements of the protocol droid in TPM? Are we to believe that all protocol droids are built of scrap and have sand in their joints even when we see them on the ships of important people?
"It is not necessary to hope in order to persevere."
-William of Nassau, Prince of Orange

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.10
User avatar
Darwin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1177
Joined: 2002-07-08 04:31pm

Post by Darwin »

NRS Guardian wrote:
avoidingthepo wrote:but if they didnt want robots to be too human-like why not make them shaped like an r2 or r5 unit?


i think its just because he was thrown together from scrap, has been neglected since he stopped being anakin's, and has sand in his joints.
3po isn't a mechanic he's an interpreter and diplomatic aid, he's probably supposed to be anthropomorphic enough to be relatively unobtrusive and to help facilitate interaction with humans but not so human-like so as to be creepy. Also, in ANH he's on a princess's diplomatic vessel sand-free in the service of the head of Alderaan's government, yet he still walks stiffly. What about the stiff movements of the protocol droid in TPM? Are we to believe that all protocol droids are built of scrap and have sand in their joints even when we see them on the ships of important people?
Right, as a protocol droid/servant, C-3PO needs to be humanoid in shape, because he has to interact with devices and objects designed for humanoids on a daily basis, as well as being harmless and amicable to deal with directly. If he didn't need to be humanoid, they wouldn't build him that way.
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23306
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Post by LadyTevar »

Time for my two cents on the 3P0 arguement:

What exactly were the battle droids built for? Battle. In battle you need to be manueverable and fast.

What are diplomatic droids built for? Translating languages, serving as waitstaff, and for the most part being servile and nearly invisible. A diplomatic droid would be in places they would never allow battle droids or other weapons. The protocol droid's awkwardness prevents it from combat manuvers, and might orginially have been deliberate design just for that reason.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

Man, I was going to say almost the exact same thing, Tevar.

Except that rather than being purposefully designed to have a docile gait, I think that 3PO and similarly modeled protocol droids walk the way they do simply because it's good enough to work well.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
Durandal
Bile-Driven Hate Machine
Posts: 17927
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:26pm
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Contact:

Post by Durandal »

Darth Wong wrote:Did you know that screen tests of the new CGI Yoda revealed that they should make him less realistic? People actually preferred a slightly less realistic Yoda, because they didn't want his movements to look too human. He had to look slightly puppetlike.

Translate this kind of preference to Star Wars and you can imagine that (especially in a universe where some people dislike droids) they would make a point of not letting droids move in an overly human-like fashion.
What's also interesting is that, according to some tests, the more realistic a CG rendering gets, the less people are willing to believe it is real. They will notice and pay attention to small flaws in, say, a rendering of a character from the Final Fantasy movie, but will be willing to accept an in-game model of a human from, say, Halo or Unreal Tournament as a real person, even though there are far fewer polygons in the model, less accurate lighting and much less detail in the textures.
Damien Sorresso

"Ever see what them computa bitchez do to numbas? It ain't natural. Numbas ain't supposed to be code, they supposed to quantify shit."
- The Onion
User avatar
avoidingthepo
Youngling
Posts: 50
Joined: 2005-02-16 12:37pm
Location: jersey shore
Contact:

Post by avoidingthepo »

i guess they serve their purpose well enough, why make them more fluid when they have capabilities enough to perform their fundtion well
=NUB=

Deceived by the devils decisions, forced into a slave
Death before dishonour for those men who were brave
Shot and sent to their grave, can't awaken, it's too late
Everything's been taken, I'm shaken, family, history, the making
MickeyMo
Redshirt
Posts: 27
Joined: 2005-02-06 01:08am

Post by MickeyMo »

I agree that puppet yoda could not do what Ep2 demanded of him. AS per Lucas saying so. So they replaced the venerable master with a CGI Yoda. Thats fine.

I like 3PO more than I like the "universal translator". I am not a big fan of "magic buttons",, inc translations.
User avatar
wolveraptor
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4042
Joined: 2004-12-18 06:09pm

Post by wolveraptor »

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Man, I was going to say almost the exact same thing, Tevar.

Except that rather than being purposefully designed to have a docile gait, I think that 3PO and similarly modeled protocol droids walk the way they do simply because it's good enough to work well.
so they willingly designed a droid that would be clumsy, slow, and generally inadequate for locamotion? when they can easily mass-produce droids that move smoothly and ably?

if you're using the cost:application argument here, it doesn't seem to cut it (sorry if i misinterpreted what you were saying). it doesn't cost them much to make droids that move well, as the Trade Fed shows. imho, the arguement that it affects people psychologically is a more satisfactory explanation.

my question is, why not put a human torso on wheels, if you don't want it to look human? aren't they sacrificing speed a bit too much?
"If one needed proof that a guitar was more than wood and string, that a song was more than notes and words, and that a man could be more than a name and a few faded pictures, then Robert Johnson’s recordings were all one could ask for."

- Herb Bowie, Reason to Rock
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

Cost and application was more of a general answer for the whole technology issue, not just this silly aside about how a bunch of droids made by different companies many decades apart walk.

I don't buy the phychological arguement simply because I cannot see the movements of the TF battledroids as being in the least unnerving, let alone actually scary. Battledroids need to be very flexible and mobile because they regularly function in combat situations, while protocol droids do not.

C-3PO is hardly clumsy, he can maintain his balance and can move from place to place just fine, even being able to book it pretty fast if need to. It's simply all that was needed, so that's all that was put into the design.

My stance of reasoning might not be very creative at times, but I think it more than often is much more realistic and less random.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
wolveraptor
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4042
Joined: 2004-12-18 06:09pm

Post by wolveraptor »

don't buy the phychological arguement simply because I cannot see the movements of the TF battledroids as being in the least unnerving, let alone actually scary.
well, the fact that you are watching a PG-rated movie and that they are obviously CG sort've takes away from the terror :)
C-3PO is hardly clumsy, he can maintain his balance and can move from place to place just fine, even being able to book it pretty fast if need to. It's simply all that was needed, so that's all that was put into the design.
it seems to me that a human walking briskly (you know, the imperious walk of the leader) could easily outpace 3PO. he seemed to be designed more for a stationary job. now that might be what's needed most of the time, but what about the other applicable uses for protocol droids that could be tapped into if they could just fucking move faster. they could brief you before meetings, and act as a general secretary (waking you in the morning, helping you keep a schedule), as well as being able to follow you from place to place with ease.

like i said earlier, the psychology problem & the mobility problem could be solved by a torso set upon wheels.
"If one needed proof that a guitar was more than wood and string, that a song was more than notes and words, and that a man could be more than a name and a few faded pictures, then Robert Johnson’s recordings were all one could ask for."

- Herb Bowie, Reason to Rock
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

unbeataBULL wrote:well, the fact that you are watching a PG-rated movie and that they are obviously CG sort've takes away from the terror :)
No, it's because they're not scary in their standard nature whatsoever. I wouldn't be scared of battledroids because of how they walk, but because they might KILL me.

As for your second reply, that's again assuming that there actually is a psychological barrier.
unbeataBULL wrote:now that might be what's needed most of the time, but what about the other applicable uses for protocol droids that could be tapped into if they could just fucking move faster. they could brief you before meetings, and act as a general secretary (waking you in the morning, helping you keep a schedule), as well as being able to follow you from place to place with ease.
But he already can do that with ease. 3PO is simply not this immobile thing that you exaggerate him out to be.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
Lone_Prodigy
Padawan Learner
Posts: 360
Joined: 2005-02-09 06:50pm
Location: Sunny California

Post by Lone_Prodigy »

When I was a kid, I thought that C-3PO was funny. When I saw commercials for I, Robot I was unnerved. Why?

C-3PO looks and acts completely harmless.
I, Robot droids sprint, make facial expressions, and other such things exactly like people- which is creepy.

Let me scale up the example a bit. Let's say you see walking down the street, perfectly normally, a TF Battle Droid with a human head attached. Just walking along, smiling, saying hello, reading a newspaper. 9 out of 10 people would rate that as creepy.
Why wonder why? The answer is simple: obviously, someone somewhere decided that he or she needed Baby Jesus up the ass.
-The Illustrious Darth Wong, on Jesus Dildos

Well actually, I am intellectually superior to you. In fact, the average person is intellectually superior to you.
-Mike to "Assassin X"
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

Yeah, you exaggerated the example to the point where it doesn't at all resemble the original idea. Of course a human head on a spindley droid body is going to be creepy.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
wolveraptor
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4042
Joined: 2004-12-18 06:09pm

Post by wolveraptor »

did you see the way 3PO walks in ANH? he's just shuffling along. anyone could out pace him.

ever notice how everyone in the movies is always walking at an extremely slow, leisurely pace when they're talking to him.

in fact, Episode II speciffically highlighted his slow speed. remember when a battle-droid head was transplanted onto his own? the battledroid did comment on how he was moving so slow.

on that note, isn't it a bit of a stretch that 3PO could be somehow transplanted onto a totally different droid's head? i mean, the protocol droid line is completely separate from the Trade Fed battle droid line. even if they were made from the same droid-parts (presumably bought from some intergalactic corporation that has economic relations with 2 different warring factions), 3PO was home-made by Anakin, and i don't know how he would've made 3PO in the same way corporations make protocol droids with out the specialized equipment.
"If one needed proof that a guitar was more than wood and string, that a song was more than notes and words, and that a man could be more than a name and a few faded pictures, then Robert Johnson’s recordings were all one could ask for."

- Herb Bowie, Reason to Rock
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16375
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Post by Batman »

unbeataBULL wrote:did you see the way 3PO walks in ANH? he's just shuffling along. anyone could out pace him.
ever notice how everyone in the movies is always walking at an extremely slow, leisurely pace when they're talking to him.
in fact, Episode II speciffically highlighted his slow speed. remember when a battle-droid head was transplanted onto his own? the battledroid did comment on how he was moving so slow.
Err-this indicates that his slow speed is detrimental to him fullfilling his function how, exactly?
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

unbeataBULL wrote:did you see the way 3PO walks in ANH? he's just shuffling along. anyone could out pace him.

ever notice how everyone in the movies is always walking at an extremely slow, leisurely pace when they're talking to him.

in fact, Episode II speciffically highlighted his slow speed. remember when a battle-droid head was transplanted onto his own? the battledroid did comment on how he was moving so slow.
3PO can almost run, as shown in the escape from Echo Base in ESB and other cases where he has been able to move rather quickly.

Also, the battle droid head specifically said "My legs aren't moving, I must require maitainance," not that he was going too slow. That's evident of either a compatability issue or a connection problem.

You really don't have much of a point anymore.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
wolveraptor
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4042
Joined: 2004-12-18 06:09pm

Post by wolveraptor »

Batman wrote:
unbeataBULL wrote:did you see the way 3PO walks in ANH? he's just shuffling along. anyone could out pace him.
ever notice how everyone in the movies is always walking at an extremely slow, leisurely pace when they're talking to him.
in fact, Episode II speciffically highlighted his slow speed. remember when a battle-droid head was transplanted onto his own? the battledroid did comment on how he was moving so slow.
Err-this indicates that his slow speed is detrimental to him fullfilling his function how, exactly?
it indicates that he's slow, not that he's too slow for his purposes. i would argue that if he were faster, he could fulfill more duties, and become more of a secretary/protocol droid, thus increasing efficiency. it isn't expensive to make a droid walk smoothly, and it is even less difficult to make a droid on wheels. so why wasn't he built on wheels? that's what i don't understand.
"If one needed proof that a guitar was more than wood and string, that a song was more than notes and words, and that a man could be more than a name and a few faded pictures, then Robert Johnson’s recordings were all one could ask for."

- Herb Bowie, Reason to Rock
User avatar
NRS Guardian
Jedi Knight
Posts: 531
Joined: 2004-09-11 09:11pm
Location: Colorado

Post by NRS Guardian »

unbeataBULL wrote: it indicates that he's slow, not that he's too slow for his purposes. i would argue that if he were faster, he could fulfill more duties, and become more of a secretary/protocol droid, thus increasing efficiency. it isn't expensive to make a droid walk smoothly, and it is even less difficult to make a droid on wheels. so why wasn't he built on wheels? that's what i don't understand.
The short answer: stairs. The slightly longer answer is he's designed to help out people in diplomacy and translation, so he needs to go where people go, most if not all places are designed and built so that people who walk on two legs can get around. So he essentially needs two legs to get around.
"It is not necessary to hope in order to persevere."
-William of Nassau, Prince of Orange

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 2.10
Post Reply