Killing in Anger

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Alexus
Padawan Learner
Posts: 245
Joined: 2005-03-02 12:07pm
Location: Yes

Killing in Anger

Post by Alexus »

The darkside is more powerful than the light.

Whenever Jedi kill Sith/Dark Jedi, they kill in anger.

Luke beats Vader in anger, Obi-Wan beats Maul in anger.

I rest my case.
User avatar
Elheru Aran
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13073
Joined: 2004-03-04 01:15am
Location: Georgia

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Elheru Aran »

Alexus wrote:The darkside is more powerful than the light.

Whenever Jedi kill Sith/Dark Jedi, they kill in anger.

Luke beats Vader in anger, Obi-Wan beats Maul in anger.

I rest my case.
*coughs* Excuse me? Dooku vs Yoda.... Yoda was winning. And he certainly wasn't angry. I doubt Obi-wan will be angry-- sad, if anything-- when he fights Anakin in Ep 3.
It's a strange world. Let's keep it that way.
User avatar
Alexus
Padawan Learner
Posts: 245
Joined: 2005-03-02 12:07pm
Location: Yes

Post by Alexus »

Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Well I think that in terms of absolute power the Dark side is more powerfull the Lightside, but the Light side can turn this power against it's user (so the greater power can be more dangerous to you then the Enemy ("much to learn you stilll have").

Also it that Revan didn't kill Darth Malak in anger (a possible KOTOR light side ending)
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Xenophobe3691
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4334
Joined: 2002-07-24 08:55am
Location: University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Contact:

Post by Xenophobe3691 »

Alexus wrote:Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.
No True Scotsman fallacy.
Dark Heresy: Dance Macabre - Imperial Psyker Magnus Arterra

BoTM
Proud Decepticon

Post 666 Made on Fri Jul 04, 2003 @ 12:48 pm
Post 1337 made on Fri Aug 22, 2003 @ 9:18 am
Post 1492 Made on Fri Aug 29, 2003 @ 5:16 pm

Hail Xeno: Lord of Calculus -- Ace Pace
Image
User avatar
Dorsk 81
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2592
Joined: 2003-03-04 08:10pm
Location: England
Contact:

Post by Dorsk 81 »

Obi Wan didn't beat Maul in anger. He was pushed back into the minning shaft because he attacked in anger, he killed Maul because he calmed himself and used the Light side to leap from the pit, call Qui Gons saber to him and cut Maul in half.
"I would, for instance, fellate a smurf before I pick death." Dylan Moran
"Only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." Albert Einstein
EBC's Devonian Deviant | GALE's Supplementary Bi Brit | BoTM's Raw Recruit | GDC's Horny Delphinidae | I'm with RMA | CoIB
User avatar
Alexus
Padawan Learner
Posts: 245
Joined: 2005-03-02 12:07pm
Location: Yes

Post by Alexus »

Oopsie.

I promised myself never to see that movie again, so I'm a bit hazy on details.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Alexus wrote:Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.
so, that's hardly suppricing as inexperienced fighter will always use brute force method when fighting a more skilled opponent (as they don't have skill to win with any other method (why do you think a swordmaster can be defeated by a total novice (master tend to be old where novices tend be young)).
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Post by Lord Revan »

Alexus wrote:Oopsie.

I promised myself never to see that movie again, so I'm a bit hazy on details.
Like it's said the TPM fight is at descirbing the good and bad point of Brute force method (it wear an opponent down(Maul vs. Jinn), but has less control and against a very skilled opponent suicidal (Maul vs. Kenobi or Dooku vs A. Skywalker)
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Meest
Jedi Master
Posts: 1429
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:04am
Location: Toronto

Post by Meest »

If a Kung-Fu guys beats a Karate guy, does that make Kung-fu stronger? If someone with no training beats the Kung-fu guy after does that make him better than the Karate guy? Just have to judge it on individual power, maybe Palpatine is the strongest because he just is.
User avatar
VT-16
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4662
Joined: 2004-05-13 10:01am
Location: Norway

Post by VT-16 »

Alexus wrote:Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.
Obi-Wan did not cross to the Dark Side to win. When he nearly did, he almost got himself killed. Only when he calmed down and focused did he win over Darth Maul. Luke managed to hold on to himself in the end as well, not striking his father down when he was defeated.
User avatar
Praxis
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6012
Joined: 2002-12-22 04:02pm
Contact:

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Praxis »

Alexus wrote:The darkside is more powerful than the light.

Whenever Jedi kill Sith/Dark Jedi, they kill in anger.

Luke beats Vader in anger, Obi-Wan beats Maul in anger.

I rest my case.
Actually, the most powerful Jedi is one who has the self control of a light side Jedi but slips into the power of the dark side.

Consider.

Maul had anger already. He kills Qui-gon. Obi-wan gets angry, and kills him.

Darth Vader has anger already. Luke gets angry and whoops him.

A light side Jedi temporarily going dark is usually the most powerful.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Lord Revan »

Praxis wrote:Maul had anger already. He kills Qui-gon. Obi-wan gets angry, and kills him.
well Kenobi got his ass kicked hard because he angry (he defeated Maul only after he had cooled down).
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Praxis
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6012
Joined: 2002-12-22 04:02pm
Contact:

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Praxis »

Lord Revan wrote:
Praxis wrote:Maul had anger already. He kills Qui-gon. Obi-wan gets angry, and kills him.
well Kenobi got his ass kicked hard because he angry (he defeated Maul only after he had cooled down).
He cut half of Maul's saber off. Thats better than Qui-gon did. Maul was getting WHOOPED, he just knocked Obi-wan off with a cheap force trick.
User avatar
Lone_Prodigy
Padawan Learner
Posts: 360
Joined: 2005-02-09 06:50pm
Location: Sunny California

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Lone_Prodigy »

Praxis wrote:
Lord Revan wrote:
Praxis wrote:Maul had anger already. He kills Qui-gon. Obi-wan gets angry, and kills him.
well Kenobi got his ass kicked hard because he angry (he defeated Maul only after he had cooled down).
He cut half of Maul's saber off. Thats better than Qui-gon did. Maul was getting WHOOPED, he just knocked Obi-wan off with a cheap force trick.
The double lightsaber was far more suited to fighting two opponents than one. And by the way, if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick". Instead, he let his emotions run free and he almost died for his mistake.
Why wonder why? The answer is simple: obviously, someone somewhere decided that he or she needed Baby Jesus up the ass.
-The Illustrious Darth Wong, on Jesus Dildos

Well actually, I am intellectually superior to you. In fact, the average person is intellectually superior to you.
-Mike to "Assassin X"
User avatar
Steven Snyder
Jedi Master
Posts: 1375
Joined: 2002-07-17 04:32pm
Location: The Kingdom of the Burning Sun

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Steven Snyder »

Lone_Prodigy wrote: The double lightsaber was far more suited to fighting two opponents than one.
And you base this on what? Or is this just your personal speculation?
And by the way, if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick".
What the fuck is a 'cheap force trick'? The only place in combat where 'cheap tricks' are found is in the mind of the loser as they blame the victor for their own failings. If we dub all effective, yet easy to implement and hard to defend against tactics "cheap" then I suppose that defines just about all of modern warfare.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by NecronLord »

Lone_Prodigy wrote:if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick".
RotS spoiler This looks unlikely. Count Dooku can send the older obi-wan flying when he seems quite calm. I don't know if there is a defence.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Crown
NARF
Posts: 10615
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:45am
Location: In Transit ...

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Crown »

Steven Snyder wrote:
Lone_Prodigy wrote:And by the way, if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick".
What the fuck is a 'cheap force trick'?
If you read his post you'll notice the ' "quotation marks" ', showing that he (Lone Prodigy) has the same reaction to the phrase; 'cheap force trick', as you. :wink:
Image
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by NecronLord »

Steven Snyder wrote:And you base this on what? Or is this just your personal speculation?
The double sabre has inferior reach to a normal sabre, but a trained user can parry two other sabres at once with it. Further, when attacking just one jedi, Maul only used a single blade.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12238
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Lord Revan »

NecronLord wrote:RotS spoiler This looks unlikely. Count Dooku can send the older obi-wan flying when he seems quite calm. I don't know if there is a defence.
there's a defence, but ti's success depends on power and skill defender compared to the power and skill of attacker (so Dooku was probaly more powerfull and/or skillfull then Obi-wan) and wont work if your not in controll of yourself
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Steven Snyder
Jedi Master
Posts: 1375
Joined: 2002-07-17 04:32pm
Location: The Kingdom of the Burning Sun

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Steven Snyder »

Crown wrote: If you read his post you'll notice the ' "quotation marks" ', showing that he (Lone Prodigy) has the same reaction to the phrase; 'cheap force trick', as you. :wink:
Found it.
Mea Culpa.
User avatar
Steven Snyder
Jedi Master
Posts: 1375
Joined: 2002-07-17 04:32pm
Location: The Kingdom of the Burning Sun

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Steven Snyder »

NecronLord wrote:The double sabre has inferior reach to a normal sabre, but a trained user can parry two other sabres at once with it. Further, when attacking just one jedi, Maul only used a single blade.
I always took the action of igniting the second blade as..."There is something I am not telling you, I am not left handed"

I conceed that the double-lightsaber does have inferior reach when both blades are ignited. But by the same token Maul seemed to do quite well with it againt Qui-Gon, despite that.
User avatar
Dorsk 81
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2592
Joined: 2003-03-04 08:10pm
Location: England
Contact:

Re: Killing in Anger

Post by Dorsk 81 »

NecronLord wrote:
Lone_Prodigy wrote:if Obi-wan had shown some self-control he could've stopped Maul from doing that "cheap force trick".
RotS spoiler This looks unlikely. Count Dooku can send the older obi-wan flying when he seems quite calm. I don't know if there is a defence.
According to SW.com, Maul used Obi-Wan's touching of the dark side as a conduit for a Force attack; using the Force, Maul pushed Obi-Wan into a deep mining pit.

Most likely because Maul isn't as strong in the Force as Dooku, he needed to use Obi as a "conduit", but because of Dookus power, he doesn't need his target to touch the Dark side. Maybe.
"I would, for instance, fellate a smurf before I pick death." Dylan Moran
"Only two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." Albert Einstein
EBC's Devonian Deviant | GALE's Supplementary Bi Brit | BoTM's Raw Recruit | GDC's Horny Delphinidae | I'm with RMA | CoIB
User avatar
Death from the Sea
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3376
Joined: 2002-10-30 05:32pm
Location: TEXAS
Contact:

Post by Death from the Sea »

Lord Revan wrote:
Alexus wrote:Sorry. But inexperienced Jedi killed in anger.
so, that's hardly suppricing as inexperienced fighter will always use brute force method when fighting a more skilled opponent (as they don't have skill to win with any other method (why do you think a swordmaster can be defeated by a total novice (master tend to be old where novices tend)).
plus, don't forget that the darkside is an easier path, so it would figure that an inexperienced lightside Jedi would be more likely to take the easy way to beat a superior opponent.
"War.... it's faaaaaantastic!" <--- Hot Shots:Part Duex
"Psychos don't explode when sunlight hits them, I don't care how fucking crazy they are!"~ Seth from Dusk Till Dawn
|BotM|Justice League's Lethal Protector
User avatar
ali-sama
Jedi Knight
Posts: 638
Joined: 2002-09-20 04:44pm
Location: Laguna Hills

Post by ali-sama »

Anger is a tool. If you let anger rule you then you go down the path to the dark side. If you use anger the way it should be. A tool. then you win.
"In eternal damnation we sow the seeds of man, so we may delight in their pain and sorrow, basking them in our infinite love.."
Charles reed March 21, 2230
Post Reply