a Clone wars question

Lord Revan · Post by **Lord Revan** » 2005-03-10 08:33pm

This talk about the PT being inconsistent with the EU made me think this. So pre-PT information about the Clone wars consistent with itself, is what you should expect after one(or two) civilwars (e.g. full of half truths and misinformation).

Darksider · Post by **Darksider** » 2005-03-10 08:37pm

Um. Exactly what was your question?

Lord Revan · Post by **Lord Revan** » 2005-03-10 08:40pm

Darksider wrote:Um. Exactly what was your question?

Is the pre-PT Information consistent and GL just ignored it or is inconsistent and there's no to depict the CW with out being inconsistent with least some information told about it?

Darksider · Post by **Darksider** » 2005-03-10 08:44pm

If OT EU is inconsistant with the PT movies, and cannot be rationalized, I'm pretty sure it gets thrown out.

I'm not sure what happens when PT and OT EU contradict one another.

Lord Revan · Post by **Lord Revan** » 2005-03-10 08:47pm

Darksider wrote:If OT EU is inconsistant with the PT movies, and cannot be rationalized, I'm pretty sure it gets thrown out.

I'm not sure what happens when PT and OT EU contradict one another.

so that not, the point. The point is did GL piss on pre-PT EU about the CW when he the PT or is pre-PT EU in itself inconsistent enough to rationalize the PT.

Stark · Post by **Stark** » 2005-03-10 10:51pm

What he's asking is about the consistency of PT-era EU. If I might rephrase his question, is the PT-EU consistent? If it is impossible to form a consistent idea of the PT era from EU sources, could this not be explained by the massive galactic upheavals that took place during this period? In this case, discarding PT-EU is desirable, since it represents a distorted, edited or propagandised representation of this period.

Connor MacLeod · Post by **Connor MacLeod** » 2005-03-11 01:25am

Lord Revan wrote:This talk about the PT being inconsistent with the EU made me think this. So pre-PT information about the Clone wars consistent with itself, is what you should expect after one(or two) civilwars (e.g. full of half truths and misinformation).

The PT aren't all that consistent with the OT either.

Lord Revan · Post by **Lord Revan** » 2005-03-11 10:00am

Connor MacLeod wrote:The PT aren't all that consistent with the OT either.

examples please.

Kurgan · Post by **Kurgan** » 2005-03-11 12:20pm

So begins another "contradictions, what contradictions??" debate.

Good luck guys...

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2005-03-11 12:24pm

Well, as long as you stay out of the discussion, they should be fine.

Kurgan · Post by **Kurgan** » 2005-03-11 02:53pm

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:Well, as long as you stay out of the discussion, they should be fine.

And not another word from you.

Gorefiend · Post by **Gorefiend** » 2005-03-12 04:08am

the only thing I ever spotted was that the clone wars took place a lot more recent then the zahn novels (and other older sources) said, but them and I can live with that one, since all the more recent sources get the timing right and zahn even wrote a short story series why the thrawn era clones are different then the clone war ones.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

a Clone wars question

a Clone wars question

Re: a Clone wars question

Re: a Clone wars question