The Only Imperial Magazine You'll Ever Need

Alexus · Post by **Alexus** » 2005-03-20 10:23am

Rate it!

It's a bit cheap, but hey.

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2005-03-21 07:11am

I'm lookin' at the AT-AT's in that pic...look at the one in the verrrrrry back..towards the left...it's angled as if it walked out from that mountain there...how in the hell did it get in that position? is that where it dropped? I couldn't have gotten OVER that mountain..no way...unless...it did...I know! It must've recalibrated it's phase variance photon emitter arrays, making it LOOK as if it is there but it's actually an image of the one closest to the camera! HA! Man I'm smurt!

Robert Walper · Post by **Robert Walper** » 2005-03-21 09:51am

Chardok wrote:I'm lookin' at the AT-AT's in that pic...look at the one in the verrrrrry back..towards the left...it's angled as if it walked out from that mountain there...how in the hell did it get in that position? is that where it dropped? I couldn't have gotten OVER that mountain..no way...unless...it did...I know! It must've recalibrated it's phase variance photon emitter arrays, making it LOOK as if it is there but it's actually an image of the one closest to the camera! HA! Man I'm smurt!

You'd dare to actually risk the wrath of stardestroyer.net by infecting Star Wars with the technobabble of Star Trek?

Is this bravery, or the act of a fool?

Chardok · Post by **Chardok** » 2005-03-21 09:57am

Robert Walper wrote:You'd dare to actually risk the wrath of stardestroyer.net by infecting Star Wars with the technobabble of Star Trek?

Is this bravery, or the act of a fool?

Who is the more foolish? the fool or the fool who asks the fool if he is a fool?

Robert Walper · Post by **Robert Walper** » 2005-03-21 09:58am

Chardok wrote:
Robert Walper wrote:You'd dare to actually risk the wrath of stardestroyer.net by infecting Star Wars with the technobabble of Star Trek?

Is this bravery, or the act of a fool?
Who is the more foolish? the fool or the fool who asks the fool if he is a fool?

You're not fooling anyone.

RedImperator · Post by **RedImperator** » 2005-03-21 01:49pm

Knock it off with the spam.

Post by **Kuja** » 2005-03-21 11:07pm

Coolness.

Post by **Gandalf** » 2005-03-21 11:16pm

That's pretty cool.

Zed Snardbody · Post by **Zed Snardbody** » 2005-03-22 12:52am

RedImperator wrote:Knock it off with the spam.

Don't you mean stop this foolishness?

Post by **Dalton** » 2005-03-22 02:13am

Zed Snardbody wrote:
RedImperator wrote:Knock it off with the spam.
Don't you mean stop this foolishness?

Yes, yes he did, and so did I.

In regards to the OP, I like the idea but not a big fan of the execution as it is.

kheegster · Post by **kheegster** » 2005-03-22 04:21pm

Dalton wrote:
Zed Snardbody wrote:
RedImperator wrote:Knock it off with the spam.
Don't you mean stop this foolishness?
Yes, yes he did, and so did I.

In regards to the OP, I like the idea but not a big fan of the execution as it is.

Well, if he deliberatedly tried to make thing look retarded, he wouldn't have done better.

Sriad · Post by **Sriad** » 2005-03-22 05:42pm

kheegan wrote:Well, if he deliberatedly tried to make thing look retarded, he wouldn't have done better.

Agreed, but some more constructive criticism:

-Bad typefaces. The thin lines make it harder to read headlines. Compare to some real Time covers to find a better one.

-One photo should take the majority of the cover (as in, more than 50% of total surface area, not one that's sort of larger). Most news-magazine covers have only one large image, and minor listings of other contents.

-Generally, compare to professionally made magazines for improvement.