Multiple Habitable Worlds in A Single Star System
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
Multiple Habitable Worlds in A Single Star System
Is it realistic to have star systems with more than one planet bearing advanced life? So far I don't see why it would be. If Mars had come out of the oven a little differently our solar system might be one of them. Do you think it would be realistic or unrealistic to have star systems with multiple habitable worlds?
- Zed Snardbody
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2449
- Joined: 2002-07-11 11:41pm
If they are moons above a gas giant, yes.
Zor
Zor
HAIL ZOR! WE'LL BLOW UP THE OCEAN!
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
- Shroom Man 777
- FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
- Posts: 21222
- Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
- Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
- Contact:
Venus, if it turned out a bit differently a few bajillion years ago, would've been habitable. Minus the acid rain, volcanoes and other deathstuff, it's exactly just like earth exactly.
"DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
There's no reason why there couldn't be more than one habitable planet in the same system. Dozens of them, like some people say is the case for Firefly and Battlestar Galactica, no. Not without wholesale engineering of the entire system.
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
Sure, it's possible.
The maximum number depends on the size of the star the planets are orbiting.
For example, our own Solar System could have had 3 around the Sun (Venus, Earth, Mars), had Venus and Mars turned out a little different
A star with the size and temperature to have a large inhabitable zone around it could have any number of planets orbiting it. The closer to the sun they got, that thinner the atmosphere would have to been, and the furhter out, the thicker (to control heat trapping and so forth)
Also, in our own solar system, if Jupiter was heavier (I don't know how much heavier), it's 4 Gaileian moons are all big enough to have developed life. (I personally think the one that's frozen over, Europa is it, probably does have life on it, or did at one time)
So, it is possible.
How LIKELY it is, is another story.
The maximum number depends on the size of the star the planets are orbiting.
For example, our own Solar System could have had 3 around the Sun (Venus, Earth, Mars), had Venus and Mars turned out a little different
A star with the size and temperature to have a large inhabitable zone around it could have any number of planets orbiting it. The closer to the sun they got, that thinner the atmosphere would have to been, and the furhter out, the thicker (to control heat trapping and so forth)
Also, in our own solar system, if Jupiter was heavier (I don't know how much heavier), it's 4 Gaileian moons are all big enough to have developed life. (I personally think the one that's frozen over, Europa is it, probably does have life on it, or did at one time)
So, it is possible.
How LIKELY it is, is another story.
Both Venus and Mars is in the habitable zone. However, some scientists have started to question this rather narrow view. There could be other processes that could lead to emergence of life even in relatively remote areas of a star system.xcr wrote:One could be earth like, I think- Is Mars not within the zone in which it is possible for a world to be habbitable?
- RedImperator
- Roosevelt Republican
- Posts: 16465
- Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
- Location: Delaware
- Contact:
That doesn't translate to human-habitable, though.Mange the Swede wrote:Both Venus and Mars is in the habitable zone. However, some scientists have started to question this rather narrow view. There could be other processes that could lead to emergence of life even in relatively remote areas of a star system.xcr wrote:One could be earth like, I think- Is Mars not within the zone in which it is possible for a world to be habbitable?
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
X-Ray Blues
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
Re: Multiple Habitable Worlds in A Single Star System
If you go by our solar system, you can get up to three habitable planets, depending on how the mass distribution falls out. Some solar systems will give you four or five, but that's pushing it. This assumes habitable means "large terrestrial planet like Earth." If by habitable, you mean any ball of rock capable of supporting complex life, then the total doubles, since the large moons of gas giants can have water oceans under their icy crusts.Junghalli wrote:Is it realistic to have star systems with more than one planet bearing advanced life? So far I don't see why it would be. If Mars had come out of the oven a little differently our solar system might be one of them. Do you think it would be realistic or unrealistic to have star systems with multiple habitable worlds?
If you include stars that have evolved off the main sequence, they have habitable zones extending from the orbit of Jupiter to past the orbit of Saturn (or, later on, past the orbit of Saturn and to the orbit of Uranus.) There, any large ice and rock moon will count as a habitable world, and you can have around ten or more.
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
If Mars and Venus had been interchanged, then you'd have three habitable planets today. Far Venus would've been massive enough to hang onto a thick, pleasant atmosphere, and near Mars's low mass would've meant it would've had a harder time holding onto an atmosphere capable of producing a runaway greenhouse effect. Of course, for this to happen, you would've needed Jupiter to orbit a bit further out, which would've either meant that, instead of having the four gas giants we have now, we'd have a giant with Jupiter and Saturn's mass combined and Uranus and Neptune, a Jupiter with a less-massive Saturn, and a Uranus and Neptune, a Jupiter, a giant with Saturn and Uranus' combined mass, and a Neptune, or a Jupiter and another gas giant with Saturn, Uranus' and Neptune's mass combined, orbiting at around the orbit of Uranus.Shroom Man 777 wrote:Venus, if it turned out a bit differently a few bajillion years ago, would've been habitable. Minus the acid rain, volcanoes and other deathstuff, it's exactly just like earth exactly.
This sort of solar system is perfectly possible, given what we know of the mechanics of solar system formation.
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
- Broomstick
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
- Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest
If you have double planets - say, if Earth's moon had been larger and more Earth-like, with an atmosphere and so forth - you could have two planets in one habitable zone. So... if venus-earth-mars orbits are "habitable", then by putting a double-planet system in each orbit you'd have six habitable worlds.
Probably not at all likely... but possible.
Probably not at all likely... but possible.
I think that may not entirely be the case. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the leading planet would be slowed down constantly by the trailing planet's gravity, while the trailing planet will be constantly sped up. Both planets should have the eccentricity of their orbits increased, but the trailer will have its semi-major axis increased, while the lead planet should have its semi-major axis decreased. Only one planet would have its orbit "decay".Destructionator XIII wrote:If they wern't perfectly opposite, their gravitional interaction would also mess things up, pulling each other off stable orbits, meaning again that both planets will decay into the star.
It hurts to think of what might happen in the long term, as periods and eccentricities change since the frequency and intensity of perterbations change. This is why n-body problems are not our friends.
- fgalkin
- Carvin' Marvin
- Posts: 14557
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
- Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
- Contact:
You've seen Gor? I pity you.xcr wrote:I remember a rather poor sci-fi movie in which there is another planet essentially the same as earth, in the same orbit exactly, on the other side on the sun, but I assume that is so close to impossible as to be a pointless consideration...
And NOTHING about Lange's folly makes even the slightest sense (take the fact that Gor has a lighter gravity, but its inhabittants are somehow stronger than their Earth counterparts), so I fail to see why we must be discussing it.
Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
Well, There are the Trojan asteroids, which move in the same orbit as Jupiter (one group moves ahead of the planet the other behind the planet). And I think there might be some smaller Jovian or Saturnian moons that share orbits but I can't remember for sure offhand.Destructionator XIII wrote:If I'm not mistaken, having a second planet in the same orbit would cause both orbits to destabilize. The gravity between the two planets would add to the star's gravity, causing both them to decay into the star. If they wern't perfectly opposite, their gravitional interaction would also mess things up, pulling each other off stable orbits, meaning again that both planets will decay into the star.xcr wrote:I remember a rather poor sci-fi movie in which there is another planet essentially the same as earth, in the same orbit exactly, on the other side on the sun, but I assume that is so close to impossible as to be a pointless consideration...
The Trojans are at Jupiter's L4 and L5 points where the gravity of Jupiter and the Sun balance out. Their own collective mass is too negligible to significantly perturb Jupiter, though.Junghalli wrote: Well, There are the Trojan asteroids, which move in the same orbit as Jupiter (one group moves ahead of the planet the other behind the planet).
I know Metis and Adrastea satisfy this condition, but their masses are far too small to drastically perturb each other.And I think there might be some smaller Jovian or Saturnian moons that share orbits but I can't remember for sure offhand.
You can search NSSDC for such moons.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/
Hmm...NSSDC has a makeover.
No, absolutely not (I'm sorry if I was a bit vague). It could for example be very tiny biospheres.RedImperator wrote:That doesn't translate to human-habitable, though.Mange the Swede wrote:Both Venus and Mars is in the habitable zone. However, some scientists have started to question this rather narrow view. There could be other processes that could lead to emergence of life even in relatively remote areas of a star system.xcr wrote:One could be earth like, I think- Is Mars not within the zone in which it is possible for a world to be habbitable?
Unsuprisingly, the Wikipedia has an article on just this topic. The situation you describe (L3) would be a solution to the three body problem, but it's an unstable one and would quickly fall apart given pertubations from the other planets.xcr wrote:I remember a rather poor sci-fi movie in which there is another planet essentially the same as earth, in the same orbit exactly, on the other side on the sun, but I assume that is so close to impossible as to be a pointless consideration...
SDN Rangers: Gunnery Officer
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
They may have claymores and Dragons, but we have Bolos and Ogres.
Space.com had an interesting article on the subject:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0 ... _like.html
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/0 ... _like.html
- Broomstick
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 28812
- Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
- Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest