Holy Mushrooms, Jesus!

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

Darth Wong wrote:
verilon wrote:Maybe yes, I did say that in anger pr haste, but that does not detract that everyone else kept pulling it too far.
The "pissing in the holy water" joke was not as mean-spirited as you made it out to be, and I think people tend to react negatively when someone is perceived as being anal about such things.
I realize that it wasn't mean-spirited, but the fact that some kept going with the fact that I was offended by it was mean-spirited.
I don't. I simply say that when it's gone too far, it's gone too far. And it has, indeed, gone too far. When people begin to get offended, don't you think that it's gone too far.
No. You can't censor yourself because you're afraid of offending people. A lot of people are offended when you come out and say that you're gay; does this mean that you've "gone too far" by saying it? Of course not.
Do I shove it in theior faces even though they're offended. Of course not.
Okay, I give you the fascist one....sorta...the Catholic system is more feudalist than anything. I'd like you to show me one statement where he "gay-bashes."
The Catholic Church's official policy on gays in the clergy is not enough of a statement for you?
Haven't we already disproven that policy several times?
Catholic != Protestant. What religion isn't intolerant? I'd like you to show me a sexist comment from HIS mouth (no sthird-hand sources).
"Christ called as his Apostles only men. He did this in a totally free and sovereign way."- John Paul II. JP2 wants us to believe that Jesus likes men better (of course, that might mean that Jesus was gay, but I don't think that's what JP2 was trying to say).
He didn't say that He thought men were better, though, just that his Apostles were men.
What Christian group (aside form Unitarian) isn't Christian-supremacist.
None, which is why I oppose that element of Christianity wherever I find it. At no point did I say this was unique to Catholicism; you seem to be under the mistaken impression that I have a problem with Catholics but not Protestants.
It seemed that way in context, yes, because you said that you singled out Catholicism. But I knoe you have a thing against every religion.
You're picking apart my arguement like you know what I mean,. like you know the implications. And I would like to formally ask you to tone down the language. I hereby apologize for mine.
A statement has implications on its own, regardless of what its author may have in his head. If he doesn't want those implications identified, he should be more careful with his wording.
You've got me there.
As for the language, you are the one who made this personal, remember?
As for the language, I was also the better person and apologized for it.
I was talking about the Catholic church, not you. But you turned this into a personal attack, ranting that you'd "lost respect" for me because I was saying such horrible things (and when I show that these statements are reasonable and unbigoted, you retort that people might find them offensive anyway, as if I should care).
You are telling me that I have some sort of Wall of Ignorance--which I do. But you as well have one (you have to admit that--we all do). But you are telling me that I am unwilling to bend to see your point--which I am not. I see your point clearly. But I am also a recent non-Catholic. What religion I am doesn't matter because you will take it down just as readily. But I am not atheist. You go around "Evangelizing" just as much as any Christian does, trying to "convert" "them" to atheism. I digress.

And sometimes, you should care. I dunno what it is, but as much as I can't stand my family, I have this weird "need" to defend them. That hurt for you to associate the Pope with the KKK....he is dignified, at the very least. And I think any good leader should deserve SOME respect form everyone, even if they be the leader of a "cult," as I am sure you think of it as. He has been Pope longer than most of us have been alive, and many people look up to him for different reasons. Sometimes quotes are even taken from him for the smallest reasons. *shrug* but you don't care, it's just my opinion. It doesn't matter to you. No one's does, except yours and your families.
I don't know what your problem is, but you obviously have some kind of emotional reaction here which is clouding your better judgement, and you would be better off sleeping on this than continuing to act like a jack-ass.
Yes, I would be better sleeping on it, and yes, an emotional reaction has overcome my judgement. But in my position (which you will obviously not step into), whose wouldn't?
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

Darth Wong wrote:
verilon wrote:Okay, that half hour was good for me to get away form this damned comp. But won't regret saying anything. I don't regret much, even if it's used agianst me later. But you know what? It is my right to get offended at a joke.
And it's our right to tell you to lighten the fuck up.
It is also MY right to take something like that personally. Even if it be wrong on my part (which it was), it is still my right.
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

Stravo wrote:Shit I check in on this thread like an hour ago and now I see Verilon getting PISSED off and debating everyone including Wong. Verilon, calm down and take a breath. I know where you're coming from but you're not wining any arguments just saying that you're offended and that Catholics are being exclusively bashed. Just relax and ignore those threads.
No one can win arguments where opinions are involved. FOr the most part, anyways.

Also, Wong: Did you read the whole post before picking it apart, or did you pick it apart bit by bit? I know I sometimes do the latter, but try to do the former. Just a question on your debating tactics. ;)
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
verilon wrote:Okay, that half hour was good for me to get away form this damned comp. But won't regret saying anything. I don't regret much, even if it's used agianst me later. But you know what? It is my right to get offended at a joke.
And it's our right to tell you to lighten the fuck up.
Can I take that advice too? I seriously need to lighten up at times...
You're so lightened up I don't think my cynical nature could stand you anymore lightened up.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

verilon wrote:You are telling me that I have some sort of Wall of Ignorance--which I do. But you as well have one (you have to admit that--we all do).
This, and the rest of the ensuing paragraph, falls into the category of "Golden Mean" fallacies.

Walls of Ignorance, logical fallacies, evangelizing, etc. are specifically defined to mean certain things. You don't just assume that someone has a wall of ignorance if he doesn't shift his position; does a mathematician have a wall of ignorance if he refuses to admit the possibility that pi might be 3.0? Is a scientist "evangelizing" when he points out that the Bible is scientifically absurd? Or is he simply stating a fact?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

There's a newbie of the month?
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

Darth Wong wrote:
verilon wrote:You are telling me that I have some sort of Wall of Ignorance--which I do. But you as well have one (you have to admit that--we all do).
This, and the rest of the ensuing paragraph, falls into the category of "Golden Mean" fallacies.

Walls of Ignorance, logical fallacies, evangelizing, etc. are specifically defined to mean certain things. You don't just assume that someone has a wall of ignorance if he doesn't shift his position; does a mathematician have a wall of ignorance if he refuses to admit the possibility that pi might be 3.0? Is a scientist "evangelizing" when he points out that the Bible is scientifically absurd? Or is he simply stating a fact?
Possibly both. I can't say for sure. And look two paragraphs down, if you don't mind.

And two posts down, too.
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

verilon wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Walls of Ignorance, logical fallacies, evangelizing, etc. are specifically defined to mean certain things. You don't just assume that someone has a wall of ignorance if he doesn't shift his position; does a mathematician have a wall of ignorance if he refuses to admit the possibility that pi might be 3.0? Is a scientist "evangelizing" when he points out that the Bible is scientifically absurd? Or is he simply stating a fact?
Possibly both. I can't say for sure.
I can. It is not "evangelizing" to state a fact, nor is it a "wall of ignorance" to take a stand on a subject where you have made a logical argument from objective facts and your opponent has not. You are subscribing to the worst excesses of subjectivism, where any kind of certainty is automatically perceived as inherently unreasonable.
And look two paragraphs down, if you don't mind.

And two posts down, too.
I saw them. I didn't see any particular reason to respond; are you implying that there is something wrong with not replying to a post in its entirety? If you bury a grossly irrational point within a post and then later say something like "OK, maybe I'm just stating opinions", why should I not point out that it's a grossly irrational point? You are working hard to accuse me of being unreasonable, but you back away whenever I challenge you on it.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

Darth Wong wrote:
verilon wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:Walls of Ignorance, logical fallacies, evangelizing, etc. are specifically defined to mean certain things. You don't just assume that someone has a wall of ignorance if he doesn't shift his position; does a mathematician have a wall of ignorance if he refuses to admit the possibility that pi might be 3.0? Is a scientist "evangelizing" when he points out that the Bible is scientifically absurd? Or is he simply stating a fact?
Possibly both. I can't say for sure.
I can. It is not "evangelizing" to state a fact, nor is it a "wall of ignorance" to take a stand on a subject where you have made a logical argument from objective facts and your opponent has not. You are subscribing to the worst excesses of subjectivism, where any kind of certainty is automatically perceived as inherently unreasonable.
Layman's terms, please....just because I'm arguoing with you doesn't mean that I am going ot understand everything that comes out of your mouth.
And look two paragraphs down, if you don't mind.

And two posts down, too.
I saw them. I didn't see any particular reason to respond; are you implying that there is something wrong with not replying to a post in its entirety? If you bury a grossly irrational point within a post and then later say something like "OK, maybe I'm just stating opinions", why should I not point out that it's a grossly irrational point? You are working hard to accuse me of being unreasonable, but you back away whenever I challenge you on it.
Well, I am NOT trying to defend the Church...just my background.

Also, I was just curious as to how you debate. I fthat isn't a reasonable question, I dunno what is.
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

verilon wrote:Layman's terms, please....just because I'm arguoing with you doesn't mean that I am going ot understand everything that comes out of your mouth.
OK, to put it simply: you seem to believe that certainty is bad. When you see someone who is certain of his position, you seem to conclude that he is being dogmatic.

This is a subjectivist mindset (that there is no "correct" answer or objective reality, hence certainty is dogma).
Also, I was just curious as to how you debate. I fthat isn't a reasonable question, I dunno what is.
I debate by looking through the post once, in search of its central point. When I identify it, I tend to pick that point out and criticize it. If it is surrounded by a lot of window dressing, I tend to ignore the window dressing.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Einhander Sn0m4n
Insane Railgunner
Posts: 18630
Joined: 2002-10-01 05:51am
Location: Louisiana... or Dagobah. You know, where Yoda lives.

Post by Einhander Sn0m4n »

Darth Wong wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:Can I take that advice too? I seriously need to lighten up at times...
You? I don't think I've ever felt that you needed to lighten up. You're cool; that's why you were the newbie of the month!
Danka My Lord! I was just checkin....
Image Image
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Vympel wrote:There's a newbie of the month?
I had no idea, either.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

Darth Wong wrote:
verilon wrote:Layman's terms, please....just because I'm arguoing with you doesn't mean that I am going ot understand everything that comes out of your mouth.
OK, to put it simply: you seem to believe that certainty is bad. When you see someone who is certain of his position, you seem to conclude that he is being dogmatic.

This is a subjectivist mindset (that there is no "correct" answer or objective reality, hence certainty is dogma).
You seem to think I'm still Catholic. :? *shrug*
Also, I was just curious as to how you debate. I fthat isn't a reasonable question, I dunno what is.
I debate by looking through the post once, in search of its central point. When I identify it, I tend to pick that point out and criticize it. If it is surrounded by a lot of window dressing, I tend to ignore the window dressing.
Thank you.
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
Drewcifer
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1515
Joined: 2002-11-05 07:13pm
Location: drawn in by groovitation

Post by Drewcifer »

Although the idea of eating mushrooms and drinking urine as sacrament sounds odd at first, there is a fine tradition of hallucinogens in religion.

Common hallucinogens used by Shamans around the world

The Council on Spritual Practices: the Entheogen Project
Entheogen Project

en·theo·gen (god within; god- or spirit-facilitating) a psychoactive sacramental; a plant or chemical substance taken to occasion primary religious experience. Example: peyote cactus as used in the Native American Church.

The purpose of the Entheogen Project is to systematically gather knowledge about the immediate and long-term effects of entheogen use and to explore how public policy might accommodate responsible spiritual practices incorporating entheogens.
And specifically on topic:
Mushrooms and snails in ancient liturgy of early Christians
The presence of mosaic illustrations in the basilica of Aquileia representing mushrooms with psychotropic properties indicates that some religious rites of early Christianity, which were probably linked to mysterial cults meant to be kept secret, were related to the ingestion of hallucinogenic substances facilitating mystic ecstasy. It still remains to be seen, however, whether these ecstatic techniques were a common heritage of all early Christian churches or whether they were known and practiced only within some heretic groups of Christians. Roman authorities repeatedly accused early Christians of practicing sorcery by using hallucinogenic substances...
(Edit: added quote for last link)
Last edited by Drewcifer on 2002-11-16 04:20am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Post by Darth Wong »

verilon wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:OK, to put it simply: you seem to believe that certainty is bad. When you see someone who is certain of his position, you seem to conclude that he is being dogmatic.

This is a subjectivist mindset (that there is no "correct" answer or objective reality, hence certainty is dogma).
You seem to think I'm still Catholic. :? *shrug*
No, I don't. But I have observed in some of your other threads relating to mysticism etc. that you have exhibited this mindset.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

Darth Wong wrote:
verilon wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:OK, to put it simply: you seem to believe that certainty is bad. When you see someone who is certain of his position, you seem to conclude that he is being dogmatic.

This is a subjectivist mindset (that there is no "correct" answer or objective reality, hence certainty is dogma).
You seem to think I'm still Catholic. :? *shrug*
No, I don't. But I have observed in some of your other threads relating to mysticism etc. that you have exhibited this mindset.
Maybe so. But I don't view certainty as bad. In fact, certainty is a good thing. Bu there has to be uncertainty, or else my mind would explode. As far as that being creationism, whatever, certainty would be nice.
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
Slartibartfast
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6730
Joined: 2002-09-10 05:35pm
Location: Where The Sea Meets The Sky
Contact:

Post by Slartibartfast »

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
verilon wrote:Okay, that half hour was good for me to get away form this damned comp. But won't regret saying anything. I don't regret much, even if it's used agianst me later. But you know what? It is my right to get offended at a joke.
And it's our right to tell you to lighten the fuck up.
Can I take that advice too? I seriously need to lighten up at times...
You? Since you started posting I think you're too f***ing lightened up :lol:
Image
User avatar
Yogi
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2163
Joined: 2002-08-22 03:53pm
Location: Los Angeles
Contact:

Post by Yogi »

Every single Catholic in the world should be killed in as brutal way as possible. There, happy now?
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

Yogi wrote:Every single Catholic in the world should be killed in as brutal way as possible. There, happy now?
There goes most of my family....ntm a certain fanfic writer...
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
Raptor 597
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3338
Joined: 2002-08-01 03:54pm
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana

Post by Raptor 597 »

Yogi wrote:Every single Catholic in the world should be killed in as brutal way as possible. There, happy now?
I have much pity on Catholics I was one, I'd rather kill the other Fundies first.
Formerly the artist known as Captain Lennox

"To myself I am only a child playing on the beach, while vast oceans of truth lie undiscovered before me." - Sir Isaac Newton
User avatar
ArmorPierce
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 5904
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:54pm
Location: Born and raised in Brooklyn, unfornately presently in Jersey

Post by ArmorPierce »

Yeah kill all the damn fundies and not just Catholic fundies, they're the ones that are annoyingly stupid and most of us has the grudge against.
Brotherhood of the Monkey @( !.! )@
To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift. ~Steve Prefontaine
Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht frist and lsat ltteer are in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey lteter by it slef but the wrod as a wlohe.
data_link
Jedi Master
Posts: 1195
Joined: 2002-11-01 11:55pm
Location: Gone to cry in his milk

Post by data_link »

Captain Lennox wrote:I have much pity on Catholics I was one, I'd rather kill the other Fundies first.
So... you want to kill Protestant fundies, Muslim fundies, Mormon fundies, Jewish fundies, but not the fundies who have done more collective damage than any one of these others? What kind of warped logic are you using to justify that?
data_link has resigned from the board after proving himself to be a relentless strawman-using asshole in this thread and being too much of a pussy to deal with the inevitable flames. Buh-bye.
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

data_link wrote:
Captain Lennox wrote:I have much pity on Catholics I was one, I'd rather kill the other Fundies first.
So... you want to kill Protestant fundies, Muslim fundies, Mormon fundies, Jewish fundies, but not the fundies who have done more collective damage than any one of these others? What kind of warped logic are you using to justify that?
He said the other ones FIRST. Not that he wouldn't kill them. ;)
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
User avatar
The Dark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7378
Joined: 2002-10-31 10:28pm
Location: Promoting ornithological awareness

Post by The Dark »

verilon wrote:
data_link wrote:
Captain Lennox wrote:I have much pity on Catholics I was one, I'd rather kill the other Fundies first.
So... you want to kill Protestant fundies, Muslim fundies, Mormon fundies, Jewish fundies, but not the fundies who have done more collective damage than any one of these others? What kind of warped logic are you using to justify that?
He said the other ones FIRST. Not that he wouldn't kill them. ;)
Not to mention that not all Catholics are fundies. My father's side of the family is Catholic, yet they're not fundies. They are somewhat conservative, but they're also all in their fifties to seventies. Compared to most of the other "elderly" people I know, they are moderate to liberal. Catholic and fundie are not synonyms, they merely tend to occur in concert rather often.
Stanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
BattleTech for SilCore
User avatar
haas mark
Official SD.Net Insomniac
Posts: 16533
Joined: 2002-09-11 04:29pm
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Contact:

Post by haas mark »

The Dark wrote:
verilon wrote:
data_link wrote: So... you want to kill Protestant fundies, Muslim fundies, Mormon fundies, Jewish fundies, but not the fundies who have done more collective damage than any one of these others? What kind of warped logic are you using to justify that?
He said the other ones FIRST. Not that he wouldn't kill them. ;)
Not to mention that not all Catholics are fundies. My father's side of the family is Catholic, yet they're not fundies. They are somewhat conservative, but they're also all in their fifties to seventies. Compared to most of the other "elderly" people I know, they are moderate to liberal. Catholic and fundie are not synonyms, they merely tend to occur in concert rather often.
Exactly. My family is a lot the same way, except they range in 40s-60s.
Robert-Conway.com | lunar sun | TotalEnigma.net

Hot Pants à la Zaia | BotM Lord Monkey Mod OOK!
SDNC | WG | GDC | ACPATHNTDWATGODW | GALE | ISARMA | CotK: [mew]

Formerly verilon

R.I.P. Eddie Guerrero, 09 October 1967 - 13 November 2005


Image
Post Reply